IBS 内提骨凿与Summers 骨凿行上颌窦内提升效果比较的实验研究

doi:10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2018.09.004

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的： 建立上颌窦内提升的山羊动物实验模型,比较IBS内提骨凿与Summers骨凿进行山羊上颌窦内提升的效果。方法： 大量预实验对山羊上颌窦解剖分析,结合山羊CBCT对上颌窦提升位点探讨,建立上颌窦内提升的山羊动物实验模型。对18只本地山羊36个上颌窦左右随机分为实验组与对照组,实验组运用IBS内提骨凿,对照组运用Summers骨凿,18只山羊依据上颌窦提升高度为5,8,10mm随机分为3组,每组6只羊头,统计每组实验组与对照组的穿孔数并记录穿孔时上颌窦提升的高度。结果： 建立了以山羊上颌第一磨牙腭侧6-8mm的位点进行上颌窦内提升的动物实验模型。每组实验组6个上颌窦穿孔数分别为0、1、3;对照组6个上颌窦穿孔数分别为1、5、6。实验组与对照组行上颌窦内提升高度为5mm时两者安全性无明显差异[( 5.00± 0.00)mm vs (4.92± 0.20)mm,P> 0.05],实验组与对照组行上颌窦内提升高度为8mm时两者差异显著[(7.83± 0.41)mm vs( 6.58± 1.32)mm,P< 0.05],实验组与对照组行上颌窦内提升高度为10mm时两者安全性差异显著[(9.17± 1.57)mm vs(6.08± 0.97)mm,P< 0.05]。结论： 山羊上颌第一磨牙腭侧6-8mm的位点进行上颌窦内提升效果显著,当提升高度小于5mm,两者提升效果无明显差异,提升高度大于5mm,两骨凿相较而言,IBS内提骨凿较Summers骨凿有更好的提升效果及安全性。

关键词: IBS内提骨凿, Summers骨凿, 上颌窦提升高度, 山羊动物实验模型

Abstract: Objective: To establish an experimental model of goat animal in the maxillary sinus and compare the effect of IBS osteotome and Summers osteotome on the maxillary sinus lift in goats. Methods: A large number of pre-experimental anatomical analysis of goat maxillary sinus, combined with goat CBCT to ex-plore the maxillary sinus lifting site, established an experimental model of goat animal lifted in the maxil-lary sinus. The 18 local goats with 36 maxillary sinus were divided into experimental group and control group. The experimental group used IBS osteotome. The control group used Summers osteotome. The 18 goats were randomly divided into 5, 8, 10mm according to the maxillary sinus lifting height. Three groups, each with 6 sheep heads, counted the number of perforations in each experimental group and control group and recorded the height of maxillary sinus lift during perforation. Results: An animal model was es-tablished for the maxillary sinus elevation in the 6-8mm lobe of the maxillary first molar of the goat. The number of perforation of the maxillary sinus was 0, 1, and 3 in each experimental group, and the number of perforation in the maxillary sinus was 1, 5, and 6, respectively. There was no significant difference in safety between the experimental group and the control group when the height was 5 mm in the maxillary sinus[(5.00±0.00) mm vs(4.92±0.20)mm, P>0.05]. The experimental group and the control group were in the maxillary sinus. When the height was 8mm, the difference was significant[(7.83±0.41)mm vs (6.58± 1.32)mm, P<0.05]. There was significant difference in safety between the experimental group and the con-trol group when the maxillary sinus height was 10mm. (9.17±1.57)mm vs(6.08±0.97) mm, P<0.05]. Conclusion: The maxillary sinus elevation of the maxillary first molar is significantly improved in the maxil-lary sinus. When the lifting height is less than 5mm, there is no significant difference between the two lift-ing effects. The lifting height is greater than 5mm. IBS osteotome has better improvement than Summers osteotome.

Key words: IBS internal osteotome, Summers osteotome, maxillary sinus elevation height, goat ani-mal experiment model

中图分类号:

782.1

温红霞,等范亚伟. IBS 内提骨凿与Summers 骨凿行上颌窦内提升效果比较的实验研究[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2018, 23(3): 114-118. DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2018.09.004

WEN Hongxia, FAN Yawei. Experimental study on comparison of lifting effect between maxillary sinus in IBS and Summers osteotome[J].Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2018, 23(3): 114-118.DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2018.09.004.

参考文献

[1] Reich KM, Huber CD, Lippnig WR, et al.Atrophy of the residual alveolar ridge following tooth loss in an historical population[J]. Oral Diseases, 2011, 17(1): 33-44
[2] Trombelli Leonardo, Minenna Pasquale, Franceschet-ti Giovanni, Minenna Luigi, Farina Roberto. Transcrestal sinus floor elevation with a minimally invasive technique[J]. Journal of Periodontology, 2010, 81(1): 58-66
[3] Woo I, Le B T.Maxillary sinus floor elevation: review of anatomy and two techniques[J]. Implant Dentistry, 2004, 13(1): 28-32
[4] Naveen Mohan, Joshua Wolf, Harry Dym.Maxilary sinus augmentation[J]. Dental Clinics of North America, 2015, 59(2): 375-388
[5] Kim Young-Sung, Kim Su-Hwan, Kim Kyoung- Hwa, et al.Rabbit maxillary sinus augmentation model with si-multaneous implant placement: differential responses to the graft materials[J]. Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science, 2013, 42(6): 204-211
[6] Wada K, Niimi A, Watanabe K, Sawai T, Ueda M.Maxillary sinus floor augmentation in rabbits: a comparative his-tologic-histomorphometric study between rhBMP-2 and autoge-nous bone[J]. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, 2001, 21(3): 252-263
[7] 陈松龄, 黄代营, 周苗, 等. 冲顶式上颌窦提升植骨牙种植动物模型的建立[J]. 中山大学学报(医学科学版), 2004 (06): 549-553
[8] Pearce A I, RichardsR G, Milz S, et al. Animal mod-els for implant biomaterial research in bone: A review[J]. Europe-an Cells and Materials(ECM),2007, 13 : 1-10
[9] 樊佳东,李岩峰,刘乐,等. 新型剥离器与伞形剥离器行羊上颌窦黏膜剥离对比实[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志,2016,34(5) : 506-510
[10] Stelzle F, Benner KU.An animal model for sinus floor elevation with great elevation heights. Macroscopic,micro-scopic, radiologi-cal and micro-CT analysis: Ex vivo[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res,2010,21(12): 1370-1378
[11] Summers RB.The osteotome technique. Part 3. Less invasie methods in elevation of the sinus floor[J]. Compend Con n Educdent, 1994, 15 : 698-708
[12] 周磊. 上颌窦底提升术的研究进展.国际口腔医学杂志,2011,38(1): 1-6
[13] Tahira Devji.Evidence about the type of graft materi-al on long-term implant treatment outcomes after maxillary sinus floor augmentation is not sufficient for making clinical decisions[J]. The Journal of the American Dental Association, 2017, 148(9):134-134
[14] 陈安勇,周尚敏,杨小东, 等. CAS-KIT 联合上颌窦冲顶在上颌窦底内提升中的临床研究[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志,2017,22(2): 60-63
[15] 高巍,李良玉,张峰. 经牙槽嵴顶入路两种微创上颌窦提升方法的应用及3~5年临床观察[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2016, 6,32(6): 643-647
[16] 楚德国. 新型穿牙槽嵴顶上颌窦底提升骨凿临床应用研究[J]. 现代口腔医学杂志,2016,30(3): 151-155