骨质类型对中老年患者种植修复长期稳定性的影响研究

doi:10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2021.12.007

中国口腔种植学杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (6): 376-381.DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2021.12.007

骨质类型对中老年患者种植修复长期稳定性的影响研究

曹晓军^1,2, 王丽杰^1,2, 王童^1,3, 李家鹤^1,3, 周文娟¹, 柳忠豪^1,3

¹滨州医学院附属烟台口腔医院种植科 264000;
²大连医科大学116044;
³滨州医学院口腔学院,山东烟台 264000

收稿日期:2021-06-09 发布日期:2022-01-07
通讯作者: 柳忠豪,Email: dentlzh@163.com,电话：0535-6220066;周文娟,Email: zhouwenjuan1004@163.com,电话：0535-6215913
作者简介:曹晓军,医师、硕士学位,研究方向：口腔种植学;柳忠豪,主任医师、博士、教授、博士生导师,院长,研究方向：各类牙缺失的综合种植治疗及相关研究;周文娟,副主任医师、副教授、博士、硕士生导师,研究方向：口腔种植及牙周病的诊疗及相关研究

Study on the influence of alveolar bone density on the long-term stability of dental implants in middle-aged and elderly patients

Cao Xiaojun^1,2, Wang Lijie^1,2, Wang Tong^1,3, Li Jiahe^1,3, Zhou Wenjuan¹, Liu Zhonghao^1,3

¹Department of Implant Dentistry, Yantai Stomatological Hospital Affiliated to Binzhou Medical University, Yantai 264000, Shandong, China;
²Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116044, Liaoning, China; 3School of Stomatology, Binzhou Medical University, Binzhou 264000, Shandong, China

Received:2021-06-09 Published:2022-01-07
Contact: Liu Zhonghao, Email: dentlzh@163.com, Tel: 0086-535-6220066; Zhou Wenjuan, Email: zhouwenjuan1004@163.com, Tel: 0086-535-6215913

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的研究不同骨质类型对中老年患者种植修复长期稳定的影响。方法回顾性分析烟台市口腔医院种植科就诊,行后牙单冠种植修复的47例中老年（50~70岁）患者,功能性负荷5年后,通过平行投照根尖放射线片,测量比较不同骨质条件下种植体周边缘骨吸收、骨密度及骨小梁的变化情况。结果种植修复体功能性负荷5年后,II-III类骨质组的种植体边缘骨吸收为近中（0.08±0.12）mm,远中（0.03±0.12）mm;IV类骨质组近中（0.01±0.12）mm,远中（-0.03±0.21）mm,差异无统计学显著性（P>0.05）;II-III类骨质组和IV类骨质组的种植体周骨密度和骨小梁分形维数均无显著差异（P>0.05）。结论不同骨质类型对中老年患者种植体周骨吸收、骨密度及骨小梁结构无显著影响。

关键词: 骨质疏松, 牙种植, 边缘骨吸收, 骨密度

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the influence of alveolar bone density on the long-term stability of dental implants in middle-aged and elderly patients. Methods A retrospective study of 47 middle-aged and elderly (50~70 years old) patients who underwent posterior single-crown implant restoration in Yantai Stomatological Hospital was performed after 5 years of functional loading. The apical radiographs were used to measure and compare the changes of peri-implant marginal bone loss, bone density, and trabecular bone structure. Results The mesial and distal marginal bone loss in the type II-III bone group was（0.08±0.12）mm and（0.03±0.12）mm respectively, while（0.01±0.12）mm and（-0.03±0.21）mm in the type IV bone group. No statistical difference was found between the two groups（P>0.05）. Conclusion Alveolar bone density has no influence on marginal bone loss, bone density, and trabecular bone structure in the group of middle-aged and elderly patients.

Key words: Osteoporosis, Dental implant, Marginal bone loss, Bone density

曹晓军,王丽杰,王童,等. 骨质类型对中老年患者种植修复长期稳定性的影响研究[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2021, 26(6): 376-381. DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2021.12.007

Cao Xiaojun, Wang Lijie, Wang Tong, Li Jiahe, Zhou Wenjuan, Liu Zhonghao. Study on the influence of alveolar bone density on the long-term stability of dental implants in middle-aged and elderly patients[J].Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2021, 26(6): 376-381.DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2021.12.007.

参考文献

[1] Silva G, Faot F, Possebon A, et al.Effect of macrogeometry and bone type on insertion torque, primary stability, surface topography damage and titanium release of dental implants during surgical insertion into artificial bone[J]. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2021,119:104515. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104515.
[2] Castellanos-Cosano L, Rodriguez-Perez A, Spinato S, et al.Descriptive retrospective study analyzing relevant factors related to dental implant failure[J]. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 2019,24(6):e726-726e738. DOI: 10.4317/medoral.23082.
[3] Storelli S, Caputo A, Palandrani G, et al.Use of narrow-diameter implants in completely edentulous patients as a prosthetic option: a systematic review of the literature[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2021,2021:5571793. DOI: 10.1155/2021/5571793.
[4] Liu X, Pang F, Li Y, et al.Effects of different positions and angles of implants in maxillary edentulous jaw on surrounding bone stress under dynamic loading: a three-dimensional finite element analysis[J]. Comput Math Methods Med, 2019,2019: 8074096. DOI: 10.1155/2019/8074096.
[5] Chaudhary M, Goel VK, Victorino GP, et al.Preoperative epigenetic preparation of patients is a current reality[J]. Surgery, 2019,166(2):147-149. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg. 2019.02.004.
[6] Lemos C, Verri FR, Noritomi PY, et al. Effect of bone quality and bone loss level around internal and external connection implants: a finite element analysis study[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2021,125(1):137.e1-137.e10. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.06.029.
[7] Wu AY, Hsu JT, Fuh LJ, et al.Biomechanical effect of implant design on four implants supporting mandibular full-arch fixed dentures: in vitro test and finite element analysis[J]. J Formos Med Assoc, 2020,119(10):1514-1523. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2019.12.001.
[8] Blanes RJ, Bernard JP, Blanes ZM, et al.A 10-year prospective study of ITI dental implants placed in the posterior region. I: clinical and radiographic results[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2007,18(6):699-706. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01306.x.
[9] Ibañez C, Catena A, Galindo-Moreno P, et al.Relationship between long-term marginal bone loss and bone quality, implant width, and surface[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2016,31(2):398-405. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.4245.
[10] Borges GA, Costa RC, Nagay BE, et al.Long-term outcomes of different loading protocols for implant-supported mandibular overdentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2021,125(5):732-745. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.04.017.
[11] 王媛媛, 孙瑞华. PASS软件实现临床试验中非劣效、等效和优效性检验的样本量估算[J].中华流行病学杂志,2016,37(05):741-744.
[12] Toghyani S, Nasseh I, Aoun G, et al.Effect of image resolution and compression on fractal analysis of the periapical bone[J]. Acta Inform Med, 2019,27(3):167-170. DOI: 10.5455/aim.2019.27.167-170.
[13] Kış HC, Güleryüz Gürbulak A.Evaluation of the peri-implant bone trabecular microstructure changes in short implants with fractal analysis[J]. Int J Implant Dent, 2020,6(1):13. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-020-00209-7.
[14] Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. On osseointegration in relation to implant surfaces[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2019,21 Suppl 1:4-7. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12742.
[15] Walsh WR, Pelletier MH, Bertollo N, et al.Bone ongrowth and mechanical fixation of implants in cortical and cancellous bone[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2020,15(1):177. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-020-01696-5.
[16] Zhang H, Shan J, Zhang P, et al.Trabeculae microstructure parameters serve as effective predictors for marginal bone loss of dental implant in the mandible[J]. Sci Rep, 2020,10(1):18437. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-75563-y.
[17] Rues S, Schmitter M, Kappel S, et al.Effect of bone quality and quantity on the primary stability of dental implants in a simulated bicortical placement[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2021,25(3):1265-1272. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-020-03432-z.
[18] Coşgunarslan A, Soydan Çabuk D, Canger EM.Effect of total edentulism on the internal bone structure of mandibular condyle: a preliminary study[J]. Oral Radiol, 2021,37(2):268-275. DOI: 10.1007/s11282-020-00444-z.
[19] Li Z, Gao S, Chen H, et al.Micromotion of implant-abutment interfaces (IAI) after loading: correlation of finite element analysis with in vitro performances[J]. Med Biol Eng Comput, 2019,57(5):1133-1144. DOI: 10.1007/s11517-018-1937-6.
[20] Albrektsson T, Becker W, Coli P, et al.Bone loss around oral and orthopedic implants: an immunologically based condition[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2019,21(4):786-795. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12793.
[21] Huang HL, Fuh LJ, Ko CC, et al.Biomechanical effects of a maxillary implant in the augmented sinus: a three-dimensional finite element analysis[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2009,24(3):455-462.
[22] Albrektsson T, Becker W, Coli P, et al.Bone loss around oral and orthopedic implants: an immunologically based condition[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2019,21(4):786-795. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12793.

骨质类型对中老年患者种植修复长期稳定性的影响研究

Study on the influence of alveolar bone density on the long-term stability of dental implants in middle-aged and elderly patients

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	周延民, 秦秋月. 上颌窦三维成骨模式促进上颌窦内成骨的临床意义[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(2): 69-76.
[2]	罗桂生, 刘雨蒙, 王鹏来, 袁长永. 微量元素改性PEEK种植体的研究进展[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(2): 109-113.
[3]	周延民, 朱悦萌. 上颌窦三维成骨模式构建[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(1): 9-18.
[4]	张启航, 龚佳明, 苟萍, 余佳颖, 薄磊, 余占海. 种植体间距对种植体周骨吸收影响的Meta分析[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2022, 27(5): 304-311.
[5]	马玉霄, 周立波, 孟凡文, 杨德钊, 王兆运, 段峰. 使用四种植入方法在下颌后牙区植入精度的体外对比分析[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2022, 27(4): 229-237.
[6]	章睿元, 仲维剑, 马国武. 根片屏障技术在即刻种植中的研究进展[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2022, 27(4): 238-242.
[7]	龚佳明, 赵瑞敏, 王佳, 戴志明, 余占海, 殷丽华. 种植体周囊肿的系统性文献综述[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2022, 27(3): 181-187.
[8]	杨晶晶, 余正荣, 龚金梅, 胡常琦, 黄江琴, 魏洪武, 郭水根. 种植体根尖周病变1例及文献回顾[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2022, 27(2): 99-104.
[9]	刘峰, 董凯, 王美娟, 许胜, 周文娟, 柳忠豪. 一种经口外装置控制的静态引导系统在种植外科的临床应用研究[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2021, 26(5): 299-305.
[10]	刘成武, 刘远翔, 李志鹏, 刘泉, 武诗语, 吴夏怡, 陈泽涛, 黄宝鑫, 陈卓凡. 两种不同螺纹设计的牙种植体在犬颌骨中骨结合的对比研究[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2021, 26(4): 226-231.
[11]	杨艳, 周文娟. 角化黏膜宽度对种植体周组织健康的临床意义及研究进展[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2021, 26(4): 253-257.
[12]	石宇彤, 王翠, 胡文杰, 徐涛, 刘云松. 伴重度骨缺损的磨牙拔除后拔牙位点保存改善种植区软硬组织效果观察（附1例2.5年随访观察报告）[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2021, 26(3): 178-184.
[13]	韦宁, 徐涛, 胡文杰, 刘云松. 对伴上颌窦底骨缺损重度牙周病变磨牙实施微创拔牙及拔牙位点保存的初步探索（病例系列研究）[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2021, 26(2): 96-101.
[14]	冯澜, 顾新华. 即刻种植修复前骨密度影像学评估方法的研究进展[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2021, 26(2): 129-134.
[15]	王星星, 陈旭涛, 王蕾, 施少杰, 赵国强, 赵文爽, 宋应亮. 伴慢性上颌窦炎上颌窦底提升的临床研究[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2021, 26(1): 13-17.