中国口腔种植学杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (4): 232-235.DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2021.08.005

• 论著·临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

前牙即刻种植和延期种植修复的牙周组织健康程度及美学效果的回顾性分析

尹恒山, 郭琦, 刘焕磊   

  1. 河南省安阳市第六人民医院(口腔医院)口腔外科 455000
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-22 出版日期:2021-08-10 发布日期:2021-09-08
  • 通讯作者: 尹恒山,Email: 1563806971@qq.com,电话:0372-5020099
  • 作者简介:尹恒山 主治医师、硕士研究生,从事方向:口腔颌面外科和口腔种植

A retrospective analysis of periodontal tissue health and aesthetic effects of immediate and delayed implant restoration of anterior teeth

Yin Hengshan, Guo Qi, Liu Huanlei   

  1. Department of Oral Surgery, The Sixth People's Hospital of Henan Province Anyang City (Stomatological Hospital), Anyang 455000, China
  • Received:2021-03-22 Online:2021-08-10 Published:2021-09-08
  • Contact: Yin Hengshan, Email: 1563806971@qq.com, Tel: 0086-372-5020099

摘要: 目的 探讨前牙修复患者选用即刻种植和延期种植的价值美学效果差别。方法 对2019年4月~2020年2月间就诊的100例前牙修复患者进行回顾性研究,按治疗方法不同分为对照组(延期种植修复)和观察组(即刻种植修复),每组各50例。统计两组红色美学指数、并发症发生率和临床指标。结果 (1)红色美学指数:观察组3个月、6个月和12个月分别是(7.72±0.23)分、(7.91±0.26)分和(8.34±0.31)分,对照组3个月、6个月和12个月分别是(6.31±0.18)分、(6.42±0.26)分和(6.61±0.28)分,观察组红色美学指数高于同时期对照组(6.31±0.18、6.42±0.26和6.61±0.28),统计值t分别为34.1373、28.6538和29.2842,P值均<0.05。(2)并发症发生率:观察组与对照组分别是8.00%和10.00%相比无差异(x2=0.1221 P>0.05)。(3)临床指标(牙周袋深度、骨吸收量、附着高度、色泽、咀嚼功能):观察组优于对照组,P<0.05。结论 即刻种植在前牙修复中获得了理想临床效果,其患者接受程度较高修复后美学效果好,种植疗程缩短,更容易为患者所接受,可以推荐作为一种重要的治疗方案。

关键词: 即刻种植, 延期种植, 修复, 前牙, 牙周组织健康程度, 美学效果

Abstract: Objective To explore the effect of immediate implantation and delayed implantation for patients with anterior tooth restoration. Methods A retrospective study was carried out on 100 patients with anterior restorations (2019.04~2020.02). According to the treatment method, they were divided into the control group (n=50, delayed implant restoration) and the observation group (n=50, immediate implant restoration). The red aesthetic index, complication rate, and other clinical indicators were compared between groups. Results (1) The red aesthetic index in the observation group was (7.72±0.23) at 3 months post-restoration, (7.91±0.26) at 6 months post-restoration, and (8.34±0.31) at 12 months post-restoration respectively, which were higher than that in the control group. The statistical t values were 34.1373, 28.6538, and 29.2842 respectively with P<0.05 at each time point. (2) There was no difference in complication rate between the observation group (8.00%) and the control group (10.00%), statistical value = 0.1221, P>0.05. (3) Clinical indicators: The observation group is better than the control group, and the statistical value is P<0.05. Conclusion The immediate implantation in the restoration of anterior teeth shows an ideal result and is highly accepted by patients.

Key words: Immediate planting, Delayed implantation, Repair, Anterior teeth, Periodontal tissue health, Aesthetic effect