帐篷钉技术在前牙美学区连续缺失种植修复中的临床分析

doi:10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2025.08.004

中国口腔种植学杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (4): 349-355.DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2025.08.004

帐篷钉技术在前牙美学区连续缺失种植修复中的临床分析

张传锴², 张佳园^1,2, 崔凌云¹, 叶亦涵², 林海燕², 陈庆生^1,2

¹杭州口腔医院城西分院 310000;
²杭州医学院存济口腔医学院 311399

收稿日期:2024-10-15 出版日期:2025-08-30 发布日期:2025-08-29
通讯作者: 陈庆生,Email：zjhzcqs@163.com,电话：0571-87224800;林海燕,Email：lhaiyanlily@163.com,电话：0571-88868818
作者简介:张传锴,硕士研究生在读、执业医师,研究方向：口腔种植材料、种植体周炎与免疫细胞稳态关系。
陈庆生,主任医师、杭州医学院存济口腔医学院兼职教授,研究方向：骨增量材料、钛网优化、骨劈开应用。
林海燕,教授、主任医师、硕士研究生导师,研究方向：新型生物骨、数字化口腔种植及种植体周炎。
基金资助:
浙江省2023年度“领雁”研发攻关计划（2023C03070）

Clinical analysis of screw tenting technology in implant restoration of multiple missing teeth in the anterior esthetic zone

Zhang Chuankai², Zhang Jiayuan^1,2, Cui Lingyun¹, Ye Yihan², Lin Haiyan², Chen Qingsheng^1,2

¹Hangzhou Stomatological Hospital, Chengxi Branch, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang, China;
²Savaid Stomatology School of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou 311399, Zhejiang, China

Received:2024-10-15 Online:2025-08-30 Published:2025-08-29
Contact: Chen Qingsheng, Email: zjhzcqs@163.com, Tel:0086-571-87224800; Lin Haiyan, Email: lhaiyanlily@163.com, Tel: 0086-571-88868818
Supported by:
The Zhejiang Province 2023 Annual "Leading Geese" R&D Program (2023C03070)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨帐篷钉技术在前牙美学区连续缺失种植修复中的临床应用效果。方法选取2019年12月至2023年12月于杭州口腔医院城西分院种植中心接受治疗的86例前牙美学区连续缺失种植患者,根据骨增量术式及种植时机的不同分为试验组（帐篷钉技术+延期种植）和对照组（常规引导骨再生+即刻种植）,每组43例。收集患者骨增量前、骨增量后6个月和12个月、种植体植入后及最终修复后1~12个月的锥形束计算机体层成像（CBCT）影像资料。对比2组种植体留存率;基于CBCT影像,测量2组患者骨增量后6个月和12个月时牙槽嵴顶处的牙槽骨宽度;并参考红色美学评分（PES）,评估患者修复即刻、最终修复后6个月和12个月种植修复体的美学状况,比较2组差异。结果对照组种植体留存率为98.21%,试验组为100.00%。试验组在骨增量后6个月和12个月时牙槽嵴顶处的牙槽骨宽度分别为（7.69±0.42）mm和（7.22±0.40）mm,均高于对照组的（6.53±0.39）mm和（6.20±0.43）mm（P=0.001）。试验组在最终修复后6个月和12个月时的PES分别为（10.72±1.42）分和（9.95±1.34）分,均高于对照组的（7.52±1.20）分和（7.01±1.15）分（P=0.001）。结论帐篷钉技术在前牙美学区连续缺失种植修复中能有效保障种植体的留存率,其效果与引导骨再生相当。在前牙美学区连续缺失种植修复病例中,帐篷钉技术可实现更佳的骨增量效果和美学修复效果。

关键词: 前牙美学区, 种植修复, 帐篷钉技术, 引导骨再生, 牙槽骨宽度, 美学状况

Abstract: Objective To use a retrospective clinical approach to analyze the clinical treatment effects of screw tenting technology in implant restoration of consecutively missing teeth in the anterior esthetic zone. Methods A total of 86 patients with consecutive anterior teeth esthetic area defects who were treated at the Implant Center of the West City Branch of Hangzhou Stomatology Hospital from December 2019 to December 2023 were included. They were divided into the experimental group (tenting screw technique + delayed implantation) and the control group (conventional guided bone regeneration technique + immediate implantation), with 43 cases in each group. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging data of patients were collected at the following time points: before bone augmentation, 6 months, and 12 months after bone augmentation, after implant placement, and 1 to 12 months after final restoration. The implant survival rate of the two groups was compared. Based on CBCT digital imaging data, the alveolar bone width at the alveolar ridge crest of the two groups of patients 6 months and 12 months after bone augmentation was measured respectively. Meanwhile, the esthetic status of the implant restorations immediately after restoration, 6 months after restoration, and 12 months after restoration was evaluated using the pink esthetic score, and the differences between the two groups were compared. Results The implant survival rate was 98.21% in the control group and 100.00% in the experimental group. The alveolar bone width at the alveolar ridge crest in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group at 6 months and 12 months after bone augmentation, with values of (7.69±0.42) mm and (7.22±0.40) mm in the experimental group, and (6.53±0.39) mm and (6.20±0.43) mm in the control group (P=0.001). The pink esthetic score (PES) of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group at 6 months and 12 months after the final restoration, with scores of (10.72±1.42) and (9.95±1.34) in the experimental group, and (7.52±1.20) and (7.01±1.15) in the control group (P=0.001). Conclusion The tenting screw technique can effectively ensure the survival rate of implants in the implant restoration of consecutive anterior teeth esthetic area defects. Its implantation effect is comparable to that of the guided bone regeneration (GBR) technique. In the implant restoration cases of consecutive anterior teeth esthetic area defects, the tenting screw technique can achieve better bone augmentation and restoration effects.

Key words: Anterior esthetic zone, Implant prosthesis, Screw tenting technology, Guided bone regeneration, Alveolar bone width, Esthetic conditions

张传锴,张佳园,崔凌云,等. 帐篷钉技术在前牙美学区连续缺失种植修复中的临床分析[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2025, 30(4): 349-355. DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2025.08.004

Zhang Chuankai, Zhang Jiayuan, Cui Lingyun, Ye Yihan, Lin Haiyan, Chen Qingsheng. Clinical analysis of screw tenting technology in implant restoration of multiple missing teeth in the anterior esthetic zone[J].Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2025, 30(4): 349-355.DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2025.08.004.

参考文献

[1] 呙誉东, 周炼. 帐篷螺丝技术在上前牙区连续缺失种植修复中的疗效评价[J].口腔医学研究,2020,36(3):298-301. DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2020.03.025.
Guo YD, Zhou L.Evaluation of screw-tent technique for dental implants in the upper anterior region with continuous adjacent teeth missing[J]. J Oral Sci Res, 2020,36(3):298-301. DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2020.03.025.
[2] Araújo MG, Lindhe J.Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. an experimental study in the dog[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2005,32(2):212-218. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00642.x.
[3] 赵永强, 蒋练. 帐篷式骨增量技术在口腔种植中的应用研究进展[J].口腔疾病防治,2020,28(12):811-816. DOI: 10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2020.12.011.
Zhao YQ, Jiang L.Application of the tent bone augmentation technique in dental implants[J].J Prev Treat Stomatol Dis, 2020,28(12):811-816. DOI: 10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2020.12.011.
[4] 邹多宏, 刘昌奎, 薛洋, 等. 帐篷钉技术在牙槽骨修复与再生中的临床应用及操作规范[J].中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2021,19(1):1-5. DOI: 10.19438/j.cjoms.2021.01.001.
Zou DH, Liu CK, Xue Y, et al.Clinical application of tent-peg technique in the reparation and regeneration of alveolar bone-standard operational practice[J].Chin J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2021,19(1):1-5. DOI: 10.19438/j.cjoms.2021.01.001.
[5] Plonka AB, Urban IA, Wang HL.Decision tree for vertical ridge augmentation[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2018,38(2):269-275. DOI: 10.11607/prd.3280.
[6] Chasioti E, Chiang TF, Drew HJ.Maintaining space in localized ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration with tenting screw technology[J]. Quintessence Int, 2013,44(10):763-771. DOI: 10.3290/j.qi.a30178.
[7] 孙莉莉, 张瑜, 陈文芳, 等. 帐篷钉技术结合CGF膜修复重度牙槽嵴缺损1例[J].口腔医学研究,2024,40(2):178-180. DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2024.02.017.
Sun LL, Zhang Y, Chen WF, et al.Tent-pole technique combine with CGF for reconstruction of serious bone defects: a case report[J].J Oral Sci Res, 2024,40(2):178-180. DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2024.02.017.
[8] 张富贵, 宿玉成, 邱立新, 等. 牙槽骨缺损骨增量手术方案的专家共识[J].口腔疾病防治,2022,30(4):229-236.DOI: 10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2022.04.001.
Zhang FG, Su YC, Qiu LX, et al.Expert consensus on bone augmentation surgical protocols for alveolar bone defects[J]. J Prev Treat Stomatol Dis, 2022, 30(4): 229-236. DOI: 10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2022.04.001.
[9] Fürhauser R, Florescu D, Benesch T, et al.Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns: the pink esthetic score[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2005,16(6):639-644. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01193.x.
[10] 张邃, 何东宁. 上前牙美学区即刻种植的研究现状[J].口腔疾病防治, 2020,28(5):331-335. DOI: 10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2020.05.012.
Zhang S, He DN.Research status of immediate implantation in the anterior maxillary aesthetic zone[J]. J Prev Treat Stomatol Dis,2020,28(5): 331-335. DOI: 10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2020.05.012.
[11] César Neto JB, Cavalcanti MC, Sapata VM, et al.The positive effect of tenting screws for primary horizontal guided bone regeneration: a retrospective study based on cone-beam computed tomography data[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2020,31(9):846-855. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13630.
[12] 翟浚江, 吴芃, 张黎, 等. 种植体规格、手术方式与上前牙区种植体唇侧骨吸收量的相关性研究[J].四川大学学报(医学版), 2019,50(6):946-950. DOI: 10.13464/j.scuxbyxb.2019.06.030.
Zhai JJ, Wu P, Zhang L, et al.Correlation study of implant specifications and surgical approaches with buccal bone resorption of implants in the anterior maxilla[J]. J Sichuan Univ (Med Sci Ed),2019,50(6): 946-950. DOI: 10.13464/j.scuxbyxb.2019.06.030.
[13] 王仲达, 王屹博, 丁超, 等. 种植义齿修复不同牙弓形态上前牙缺失的三维有限元分析[J].中国组织工程研究, 2018,22(30):4818-4823. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.0982.
Wang ZD, Wang YB, Deng C, et al.Three-dimensional finite element analysis of implant denture for anterior tooth missing with different arch shapes[J].Chin J Tissue Eng Res, 2018,22(30):4818-4823. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.0982.
[14] 杨思嘉, 沈晓艇, 包雨晨, 等. 帐篷钉技术在牙槽嵴骨增量中的应用研究[J].口腔医学,2022,42(5):462-466. DOI: 10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2022.05.015.
Yang SJ, Shen XT, Bao YC, et al.Application of tenting screw technique in alveolar ridge augmentation[J].Stomatology, 2022,42(5):462-466. DOI: 10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2022.05.015.
[15] 宋天翔. 3D打印氧化锆帐篷钉有限元结构优化设计及性能研究[D]. 济南:山东大学,2023.
Song TX.Finite element structural optimization design and performance study of 3D-printed zirconia tent-pole screws[D]. Jinan: Shandong Univ, 2023.
[16] 朱昱树, 李欣伦, 杨乙苓, 等. 新型帐篷钉技术在骨增量术中的临床应用研究[J].实用医院临床杂志, 2023, 20(2):15-18.
Zhu YS, Li XL, Yang YL, et al.Clinical application of a novel tent-pole technique in bone augmentation surgery[J]. Pract J Clin Med,2023,20(2): 15-18.
[17] 孔德婧, 姜兆霞, 韩文利, 等. 帐篷钉技术在下颌后牙区骨增量的应用疗效分析[J].口腔医学研究,2023, 39(10):892-897. DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2023.10.008.
Kong DJ, Jiang ZX, Han WL, et al.Efficacy analysis of tent nail technique for bone augmentation in mandibular posterior region[J].J Oral Sci Res, 2023,39(10):892-897. DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2023.10.008.
[18] 张嘉义, 史剑杰. 帐篷技术在牙槽骨垂直骨增量中的应用[J].中国美容医学,2023,32(11):194-198. DOI: 10.15909/j.cnki.cn61-1347/r.005979.
Zhang JY, Shi JJ.Application of tent-pole technique in vertical alveolar bone augmentation[J]. Chin J Aesthet Med, 2023,32(11):194-198. DOI: 10.15909/j.cnki.cn61-1347/r.005979.
[19] Arnal HM, Angioni CD, Gaultier F, et al.Horizontal guided bone regeneration on knife-edge ridges: a retrospective case-control pilot study comparing two surgical techniques[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2022,24(2):211-221. DOI: 10.1111/cid.13073.
[20] 余洪强, 赵健, 王海霞. 膜引导骨再生技术在上前牙种植中应用临床效果[J].临床军医杂志,2019,47(7):757-758,760. DOI: 10.16680/j.1671-3826.2019.07.40.
Yu HQ, Zhao J, Wang HX.Clinical effect of guided bone regeneration technique in anterior maxillary implantation[J]. Clin J Med Offic, 2019,47(7): 757-758,760. DOI: 10.16680/j.1671-3826.2019.07.40.
[21] 容明灯, 张雪洋, 黄雁红, 等. 改良Onlay植骨术在增量上前牙区水平向严重骨缺损中的临床应用[J].广东医学,2018,39(10):1466-1470. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9448.2018.10.008.
Rong MD, Zhang XY, Huang YH, et al.The modified Onlay technique in broadening alveolar ridge of anterior maxillary region with severe bone defect[J].Guangdong Med J,2018,39(10):1466-1470. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9448.2018.10.008.
[22] 宋应亮, 赵文爽, 宋爽. 帐篷螺丝技术与常规GBR在水平骨增量的临床疗效对比[J].口腔医学,2021,41(2):103-109. DOI: 10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2021.02.002.
Song YL, Zhao WS, Song S.Comparison of clinical efficacy between tent screw technique and GBR technique for horizontal bone augment[J]. Stomatology,2021,42(2):103-109. DOI: 10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2021.02.002.
[23] Le B, Rohrer MD, Prasad HS.Screw "tent-pole" grafting technique for reconstruction of large vertical alveolar ridge defects using human mineralized allograft for implant site preparation[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2010,68(2):428-435. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.059.
[24] 吴靖, 赵正宜, 邹多宏, 等. 帐篷钉技术在牙槽骨重度缺损修复重建中的应用:30例临床病例回顾性分析与总结[J].上海交通大学学报(医学版),2022,42(6):768-777. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2022.06.011.
Wu J, Zhao ZY, Zou DH, et al.Application of a tent-pole screw technology in reconstruction of severe alveolar bone defect: a retrospective study of 30 patients[J].J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ (Med Sci),2022,42(6):768-777. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2022.06.011.
[25] Xiao T, Zhao Y, Luo E, et al."tent-pole" for reconstruction of large alveolar defects: a case report[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2016,74(1):55-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.08.007.

帐篷钉技术在前牙美学区连续缺失种植修复中的临床分析

Clinical analysis of screw tenting technology in implant restoration of multiple missing teeth in the anterior esthetic zone

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	徐微, 刘健忠, 王予江. 二次骨劈开配合GBR治疗右下磨牙区水平骨量不足的种植修复1例[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2025, 30(4): 388-392.
[2]	吴轶群, 王凤, 陶宝鑫. 基于颧种植技术的无牙上颌新分类及即刻负荷解决方案[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2025, 30(3): 203-208.
[3]	李广大, 丁明超, 常欣, 经博雅, 王敬夫, 王维戚. 屏障膜在口腔引导骨再生中的研究进展[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2025, 30(3): 288-295.
[4]	胡修诚, 孙仕晨, 吴彬彬, 吴丹, 孙海鹏. 梯形全厚瓣与复合瓣在下颌后牙区引导骨再生中的应用对比[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2025, 30(2): 144-150.
[5]	王子扬, 马旭东. 成骨/破骨细胞轴对糖尿病骨代谢影响的研究进展[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2025, 30(2): 176-179.
[6]	宿玉成, 任斌. 3D打印个性化钛网支撑的引导骨再生术后钛网暴露的原因、预防与治疗[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2025, 30(1): 5-12.
[7]	王怀升, 韩泽奎, 臧旖欣, 宋振宇, 宋颐函, 孙子惠, 王心彧. 个性化钛网辅助修复大范围下颌牙槽骨缺损的静态力学分析[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2025, 30(1): 13-18.
[8]	李松航, 蔡潇潇. 数字化钛网与可吸收性胶原膜骨增量效果的对比——一项回顾性研究[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2025, 30(1): 19-26.
[9]	熊振杰, 魏永祥, 刘倩, 陈雅馨, 郭雪琪, 季若桐, 苏汉福, 邹耀堃, 王丽萍. 3D打印个性化钛网用于修复严重牙槽骨缺损的临床效果——一项回顾性病例系列研究[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2025, 30(1): 27-34.
[10]	高佳雨, 满毅. 数字化技术在侧壁开窗上颌窦底提升中的应用[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2024, 29(6): 537-542.
[11]	雷妍汐, 袁泉, 吕鸣樾. 立体摄影测量技术在全口种植修复印模制取中应用的文献回顾[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2024, 29(6): 590-595.
[12]	邱立新, 牛力璇. 下颌后牙区垂直骨量不足的解决方案[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2024, 29(5): 400-406.
[13]	张硕, 刘畅, 肖含瑜, 张伟峰, 邓焕泽, 张健. 生物可吸收性胶原膜的固定方式对上颌前牙区水平骨增量效果的影响[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2024, 29(5): 420-428.
[14]	杜奥博, 满毅. 美学区分阶段骨增量联合邻牙显微根尖手术的治疗策略：临床诊治流程及实践病例[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2024, 29(5): 440-444.
[15]	万鹏. 美学区应用不可吸收性屏障膜进行骨增量的5年临床观察[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2024, 29(5): 445-452.