帐篷技术用于牙槽嵴增量的Meta分析

doi:10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2023.10.010

中国口腔种植学杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (5): 351-357.DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2023.10.010

帐篷技术用于牙槽嵴增量的Meta分析

龚佳明^1,2, 赵瑞敏^1,2, 郎鑫³, 余占海³, 袁振飞¹

¹温州医科大学附属衢州医院（衢州市人民医院）口腔科 324000;
²解放军联勤保障部队第940医院口腔科,兰州 730050;
³兰州大学口腔医学院/口腔医院 730000

收稿日期:2023-01-09 出版日期:2023-10-30 发布日期:2023-11-07
通讯作者: 袁振飞,Email：zhenfeiyuan@sina.com,电话：0570-8895120
作者简介:龚佳明,硕士、医师,研究方向：口腔种植学及循证医学;袁振飞,主任医师,研究方向：口腔种植修复及颌面外科
基金资助:
浙江省自然科学基金（LY15H140007）;浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目（2018KY878）

Meta-analysis of tenting technique for alveolar ridge augmentation

Gong Jiaming^1,2, Zhao Ruimin^1,2, Lang Xin³, Yu Zhanhai³, Yuan Zhenfei¹

¹Department of Stomatology, Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (Quzhou People’s Hospital), Quzhou 324000, China;
²Department of Stomatology, The 940th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of People’s Liberation Army, Lanzhou 730050, China;
³School & Hospital of Stomatology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China

Received:2023-01-09 Online:2023-10-30 Published:2023-11-07
Contact: Yuan Zhenfei, Email: zhenfeiyuan@sina.com, Tel: 0086-570-8895120
Supported by:
Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LY15H140007); Zhejiang Medicine and Health Science and Technology Plan Project (2018KY878)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的通过Meta 分析方法系统评估牙槽嵴缺损时使用帐篷技术进行骨增量的有效性。方法电子检索2002年4月1日至2022年10月10日PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Cochrane Library、CNKI、万方、SinoMed数据库有关牙槽嵴增量使用帐篷技术和常规骨增量技术的对照研究。结果共纳入9篇研究,其中7篇研究有关水平骨增量,2篇研究有关垂直骨增量。Meta 分析结果显示,帐篷技术与引导骨再生在水平骨增量[MD=0.89,95%CI（-0.07,1.85）,P=0.07]和术后并发症[RR=3.90,95%CI（0.85,17.96）,P=0.08]上表现相似。帐篷技术与引导骨再生和Onlay植骨相比有更少的骨吸收[MD=-3.98,95%CI（-6.32,-1.65）,P=0.0008],较Onlay植骨可获得更多的垂直骨增量[MD=1.09,95%CI（0.38,1.81）,P=0.003],但在种植体植入率上表现相似。结论有限证据表明,在牙槽嵴增量中帐篷技术可获得与引导骨再生或Onlay植骨类似或略佳的骨增量效果且骨吸收率更低,可作为扩增牙槽嵴轮廓的替代方案。

关键词: 帐篷技术, 牙槽嵴增量, 骨移植, 种植体, Meta分析

Abstract: Objective To systematically evaluate the efficacy of applying the tent technique (TT) in alveolar ridge augmentation. Methods The PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, and SinoMed databases were electronically searched from April 1, 2002 to October 10, 2022 to identify clinical trials that employed TT in alveolar ridge augmentation. Results A total of 9 studies were included, of which 7 referred to horizontal ridge augmentation and 2 referred to vertical ridge augmentation. Meta-analysis indicated that TT had similar performance in horizontal ridge augmentation [MD=0.89, 95% CI (-0.07, 1.85), P=0.07] and postoperative complications compared with guided bone regeneration (GBR) [RR=3.90, 95% CI (0.85, 17.96), P=0.08]. Furthermore, TT had significantly less bone resorption than GBR and Onlay graft [MD=-3.98, 95% CI (-6.32, -1.65), P=0.0008], which could obtain more vertical ridge augmentation than the latter [MD=1.09, 95% CI (0.38, 1.81), P=0.003]. In terms of implant placement rate, their performance was as expected. Conclusion TT, as an alternative technique for alveolar ridge augmentation, achieves similar or better bone incremental performance than GBR or Onlay graft.

Key words: Tenting technique, Alveolar ridge augmentation, Bone graft, Dental implant, Meta-analysis

龚佳明,赵瑞敏,郎鑫,等. 帐篷技术用于牙槽嵴增量的Meta分析[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(5): 351-357. DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2023.10.010

Gong Jiaming, Zhao Ruimin, Lang Xin, Yu Zhanhai, Yuan Zhenfei. Meta-analysis of tenting technique for alveolar ridge augmentation[J].Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2023, 28(5): 351-357.DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2023.10.010.

参考文献

[1] Gruber R.Osteoimmunology: inflammatory osteolysis and regeneration of the alveolar bone[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2019,46(Suppl 21):S52-S69. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13056.
[2] Tolstunov L, Hamrick J, Broumand V, et al.Bone augmentation techniques for horizontal and vertical alveolar ridge deficiency in oral implantology[J]. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am, 2019,31(2):163-191. DOI: 10.1016/j.coms.2019.01.005.
[3] Hameed MH, Gul M, Ghafoor R, et al.Vertical ridge gain with various bone augmentation techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Prosthodont, 2019,28(4):421-427. DOI: 10.1111/jopr.13028.
[4] Urban IA, Monje A.Guided bone regeneration in alveolar bone reconstruction[J]. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am, 2019,31(2):331-338. DOI: 10.1016/j.coms.2019.01.003.
[5] Louis PJ, Sittitavornwong S.Managing bone grafts for the mandible[J]. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am, 2019,31(2):317-330. DOI: 10.1016/j.coms.2018.12.008.
[6] Moy PK, Aghaloo T.Risk factors in bone augmentation procedures[J]. Periodontol 2000, 2019,81(1):76-90. DOI: 10.1111/prd.12285.
[7] Garcia J, Dodge A, Luepke P, et al.Effect of membrane exposure on guided bone regeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2018,29(3):328-338. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13121.
[8] Esenlik E, DeMitchell-Rodriguez EM. Alveolar distraction[J]. Clin Plast Surg, 2021,48(3):419-429. DOI: 10.1016/j.cps.2021.02.004.
[9] Marx RE, Shellenberger T, Wimsatt J, et al. Severely resorbed mandible: predictable reconstruction with soft tissue matrix expansion (tent pole) grafts[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2002,60(8):878-888, discussion 888-889. DOI: 10.1053/joms.2002.33856.
[10] 赵永强, 蒋练. 帐篷式骨增量技术在口腔种植中的应用研究进展[J].口腔疾病防治,2020,28(12):811-816. DOI: 10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2020.12.011.
[11] Pourdanesh F, Esmaeelinejad M, Aghdashi F.Clinical outcomes of dental implants after use of tenting for bony augmentation: a systematic review[J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2017,55(10):999-1007. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2017.10.015.
[12] Daga D, Mehrotra D, Mohammad S, et al.Tentpole technique for bone regeneration in vertically deficient alveolar ridges: a review[J]. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res, 2015,5(2):92-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2015.03.001.
[13] Zhang Q, Zhang LL, Yang Y, et al.Improvement of implant placement after bone augmentation of severely resorbed maxillary sinuses with ‘tent-pole’ grafting technique in combination with rhBMP-2[J]. Chin J Dent Res, 2017,20(1):9-17. DOI: 10.3290/j.cjdr.a37737.
[14] Korpi JT, Kainulainen VT, Sándor GK, et al.Long-term follow-up of severely resorbed mandibles reconstructed using tent pole technique without platelet-rich plasma[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2012,70(11):2543-2548. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2012.07.027.
[15] Sverzut CE, Trivellato AE, Sverzut AT.Use of a titanium mesh “shelter” combined with the soft tissue matrix expansion (tent pole) grafting in the reconstruction of a severely resorbed edentulous mandible. Technical note[J]. Braz Dent J, 2015,26(2):193-197. DOI: 10.1590/0103-6440201301957.
[16] Gultekin BA, Bedeloglu E, Kose TE, et al.Comparison of bone resorption rates after intraoral block bone and guided bone regeneration augmentation for the reconstruction of horizontally deficient maxillary alveolar ridges[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2016,2016:4987437. DOI: 10.1155/2016/4987437.
[17] Morad G, Khojasteh A.Cortical tenting technique versus onlay layered technique for vertical augmentation of atrophic posterior mandibles: a split-mouth pilot study[J]. Implant Dent, 2013,22(6):566-571. DOI: 10.1097/01.id.0000433590.33926.af.
[18] Rocchietta I, Simion M, Hoffmann M, et al.Vertical bone augmentation with an autogenous block or particles in combination with guided bone regeneration: a clinical and histological preliminary study in humans[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2016,18(1):19-29. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12267.
[19] Deeb GR, Tran D, Carrico CK, et al.How effective is the tent screw pole technique compared to other forms of horizontal ridge augmentation?[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2017,75(10):2093-2098. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2017.05.037.
[20] 呙誉东, 周炼. 帐篷技术与GBR技术应用的CBCT对比研究[J].中国继续医学教育,2020,12(8):128-131. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9308.2020.08.050.
[21] César Neto JB, Cavalcanti MC, Sapata VM, et al.The positive effect of tenting screws for primary horizontal guided bone regeneration: a retrospective study based on cone-beam computed tomography data[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2020,31(9):846-855. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13630.
[22] 呙誉东, 周炼, 张东强. 帐篷螺丝技术在单颗上前牙水平向骨增量的临床应用[J].中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版),2020,14(1):41-46. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2020.01.009.
[23] 王金刚, 于婷婷. 帐篷螺丝技术与引导骨再生技术在上前牙单牙缺失患者行水平向骨增量中的应用效果比较[J].中国民康医学,2021,33(11):132-134. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0369.2021.11.054.
[24] Johar AO.Ridge augmentation with autogenous bone graft and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membrane using tenting screw: a randomized controlled clinical trial[J]. J Contemp Dent Pract, 2019,20(4):409-416.
[25] Yuan S, Mu Z, Huang Y, et al.Comparison of in-situ bone ring technique and tent-pole technique for horizontally deficient alveolar ridge in the anterior maxilla[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2020,22(2):167-176. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12887.
[26] Javed F, Khan FR.Insufficient evidence to claim superiority of bone-ring technique over tent-pole augmentation in cawood-howell’s class IV defects[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2020,22(5):654. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12929.
[27] Mir-Mari J, Wui H, Jung RE, et al.Influence of blinded wound closure on the volume stability of different GBR materials: an in vitro cone-beam computed tomographic examination[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2016,27(2):258-265. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12590.
[28] Yu H, Chen L, Zhu Y, et al.Bilamina cortical tenting grafting technique for three-dimensional reconstruction of severely atrophic alveolar ridges in anterior maxillae: a 6-year prospective study[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2016,44(7):868-875. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.04.018.
[29] Le B, Rohrer MD, Prasad HS.Screw “tent-pole” grafting technique for reconstruction of large vertical alveolar ridge defects using human mineralized allograft for implant site preparation[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2010,68(2):428-435. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.059.
[30] Elnayef B, Monje A, Gargallo-Albiol J, et al.Vertical ridge augmentation in the atrophic mandible: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2017,32(2):291-312. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.4861.
[31] Mordenfeld A, Johansson CB, Albrektsson T, et al.A randomized and controlled clinical trial of two different compositions of deproteinized bovine bone and autogenous bone used for lateral ridge augmentation[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2014,25(3):310-320. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12143.
[32] Sanz M, Vignoletti F.Key aspects on the use of bone substitutes for bone regeneration of edentulous ridges[J]. Dent Mater, 2015,31(6):640-647. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.03.005.
[33] Aloy-Prósper A, Carramolino-Cuéllar E, Peñarrocha-Oltra D, et al.Intraoral onlay block bone grafts versus cortical tenting technique on alveolar ridge augmentations: a systematic review[J]. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 2022,27(2):e181-e190. DOI: 10.4317/medoral.25169.
[34] Chasioti E, Chiang TF, Drew HJ.Maintaining space in localized ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration with tenting screw technology[J]. Quintessence Int, 2013,44(10):763-771. DOI: 10.3290/j.qi.a30178.

帐篷技术用于牙槽嵴增量的Meta分析

Meta-analysis of tenting technique for alveolar ridge augmentation

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	田聪, 周立伟, 李孟铨. Ⅲ、Ⅳ型成骨不全症患者种植治疗进展[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(5): 371-376.
[2]	骆泯润, 白雪莹, 祝雨茜, 吴涛, 周毅. 无牙颌金属种植导板精度分析的病例系列[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(4): 223-228.
[3]	赵瑞敏, 龚佳明, 李健学, 苏琳涵. 自体血小板浓缩物对上颌窦底提升的临床效果影响：基于随机对照试验的Meta分析[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(4): 270-278.
[4]	蔡国鑫. 骨结合种植体取出技术应用进展[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(4): 279-284.
[5]	王琦, 滕微微, 苏天月, 舒倩怡, 李翠英, 王心彧, 周立波. 口腔种植的体内实验中模拟人颌骨动物模型的选择[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(4): 285-289.
[6]	唐礼, 陈利益. 减少种植粘接固位全冠修复粘接剂残留的研究进展[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(4): 290-294.
[7]	徐淑兰, 李平. 机器人辅助口腔种植体植入术：机遇与挑战[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(3): 140-145.
[8]	皮雪敏, 陈德平, 任斌, 潘红, 宿玉成, 刘倩, 汪霞. 口腔种植机器人辅助美学区种植即刻修复的临床研究[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(3): 179-185.
[9]	宋颐函, 郑晓晓, 孙子惠, 张岩, 韩泽奎, 宿玉成, 王心彧. 均一与梯度孔隙率Gyroid结构力学性能研究及多孔种植体增材制造[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(3): 204-209.
[10]	罗桂生, 刘雨蒙, 王鹏来, 袁长永. 微量元素改性PEEK种植体的研究进展[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(2): 109-113.
[11]	中华口腔医学会口腔种植专业委员会. 上颌窦底提升骨增量材料的专家共识：骨代用品[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(1): 3-8.
[12]	刘月, 赵雅君, 刘金, 杜密, 兰晶. 种植体周微生物特点及其在疾病状态下的变化[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(1): 35-39.
[13]	皮雪敏, 刘倩, 陈德平, 任斌, 潘红, 宿玉成. 上颌窦底提升方案的决策原则（三）[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(1): 58-66.
[14]	顾腾, 王旭冉, 王鹏来. 聚醚醚酮改性应用于种植体的研究进展[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2022, 27(6): 371-375.
[15]	中华口腔医学会口腔种植专业委员会. 上颌窦底提升并发症的专家共识：种植体脱入上颌窦（第一版）[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2022, 27(5): 264-268.