种植体-基台界面至冠-基台粘接界面距离对边缘骨吸收影响：4-5 年回顾性研究

doi:10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2020.12.004

中国口腔种植学杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (4): 161-164.DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2020.12.004

种植体-基台界面至冠-基台粘接界面距离对边缘骨吸收影响：4-5 年回顾性研究

夏勋, 魏振宇, 胡常琦, 黄江琴, 龚金梅, 郭水根, 魏洪武

330000 南昌大学第四附属医院口腔科（夏勋,胡常琦,黄江琴,龚金梅,郭水根,魏洪武）; 南昌大学抚州医学院（魏振宇）。

出版日期:2020-12-10 发布日期:2021-09-01
通讯作者: 魏洪武
基金资助:
南昌市科技局社会发展领域计划（2013KJ2C034）

The effect of the distance from the implant-abutment interface to the porcelain-abutment bonded interface on marginal bone loss: a 4-5 year retrospective study

XIA Xun, WEI Zhenyu, HU Changqi, et al

Dept. of Stomatology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University

Online:2020-12-10 Published:2021-09-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的: 分析Bicon种植体种植体-基台界面（implant-abutment interface,IAI）至修复体-基台粘接界面（porcelain-abutment bonded interface,PAI）之间的距离对边缘骨吸收(MBL)的影响。方法: 选取2011 年6 月至2014年12月于本院种植的患者,通过影像学分析IAI至PAI的距离与MBL之间的相关性。结果: 在二维水平上,IAI至PAI的垂直距与MBL、点距与MBL之间显示出显著相关性（P<0.01）,相关程度为弱相关。水平距与MBL之间未显示显著相关性（P>0.05）。结论: 在不影响美学的条件下,适当增加IAI与PAI的距离,有利于骨组织的保存。

关键词: Bicon种植体, 粘接, 边缘骨吸收

Abstract: Objective: To analyze the effect of the distance from Bicon implant-abutment interface (IAI) to prosthesis-abutment bonded interface(PAI) on marginal bone loss(MBL). Methods: Select the patients who meet the criteria from June 2011 to December 2014, and analyze the correlation between the distance between IAI and PAI and MBL by imaging. Results: On the two-dimensional level, the vertical distance and distance between points from IAI to PAI showed a significant correlation with MBL(P<0.01), and the degree of correlation was weak. There was no significant correlation between horizontal distance and MBL (P>0.05). Conclusion: Without affecting aesthetics, properly increasing the distance between IAI and PAI is beneficial to the preservation of bone tissue.

Key words: Bicon implant, bond, marginal bone loss

中图分类号:

R782.12

夏勋,魏振宇,胡常琦,等. 种植体-基台界面至冠-基台粘接界面距离对边缘骨吸收影响：4-5 年回顾性研究[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2020, 25(4): 161-164. DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2020.12.004

XIA Xun, WEI Zhenyu, HU Changqi, et al. The effect of the distance from the implant-abutment interface to the porcelain-abutment bonded interface on marginal bone loss: a 4-5 year retrospective study[J].Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2020, 25(4): 161-164.DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2020.12.004.

参考文献

1 Dincer Bozkaya, Sinan Müftü. Mechanics of the tapered interference fit in dental implants[J]. Journal of Biomechanics, 2003, 36(11) : 1649-1658
2 Marco Tallarico, Luigi Canullo, Martina Caneva, et al. Microbial colonization at the implant-abutment interface and its possible influence on periimplantitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 2017, 61(3),233-241
3 Albrektsson T, Zarb G A, Worthington P, et al. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: A review and proposed criteria of success[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1986, 1(1) : 11-25
4 Blanes R J, Bernard J P, Blanes Z M, et al. A 10‐year prospective study of ITI dental implants placed in the posterior region. I: Clinical and radiographic results[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2007, 18(6):707-714
5 Julia-Gabriela, Wittneben, Tim, et al. Screw retained vs. cement retained implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis[J]. Periodontology 2000, 2017,73(1) :141-151
6 Lemos C A A, Eduardo D S B V, Almeida D A D F, et al. Evaluation of cement-retained versus screw-retained implant-supported restorations for marginal bone loss[J]. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2016, 115(4) :419-427
7 Kappel S, Eiffler C, Lorenzo-Bermejo, et al. Undetected residual cement on standard or individualized all eramic abutments with cemented zirconia single crowns-a prospective randomized pilot trial[J]. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2016, 27(9) : 1065-1071
8 Gladys S, Meerbeek B V, Lambrechts P, et al. Microleakage of adhesive restorative materials[J]. American Journal of Dentistry, 2001, 14(3) : 170-176
9 Chrcanovic B R, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Reasons for failures of oral implants[J]. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 2014, 41(6) : 443-476
10 Marcantonio C, Nicoli L G, Junior E M, et al. Prevalence and Possible Risk Factors of Peri-implantitis: A Concept Review[J]. Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, 2015, 16(9) : 750-757
11 Strietzel F P, Neumann K, Hertel M. Impact of platform switching on marginal peri-implant bone-level changes. A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2015, 26(3) : 342-358
12 Albrektsson T, Chrcanovic B, Ostman, P.-O, et al. Initial and long-term crestal bone responses to modern dental implants[J]. Periodontology, 2000, 2017, 73(1) : 41-50
13 Urdaneta R A, Daher S, Lery J, et al. Factors Associated with Crestal Bone Gain on Single-Tooth Locking-Taper Implants: The Effect of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2011, 26(5) : 1063-1078

[1]	张启航, 龚佳明, 苟萍, 余佳颖, 薄磊, 余占海. 种植体间距对种植体周骨吸收影响的Meta分析[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2022, 27(5): 304-311.
[2]	曹晓军, 王丽杰, 王童, 李家鹤, 周文娟, 柳忠豪. 骨质类型对中老年患者种植修复长期稳定性的影响研究[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2021, 26(6): 376-381.
[3]	杨艳, 周文娟. 角化黏膜宽度对种植体周组织健康的临床意义及研究进展[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2021, 26(4): 253-257.
[4]	王星星, 陈旭涛, 王蕾, 施少杰, 赵国强, 赵文爽, 宋应亮. 伴慢性上颌窦炎上颌窦底提升的临床研究[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2021, 26(1): 13-17.
[5]	陈萍, 姚贵良, 王夏衡. 康盛种植体短期临床效果和影像学结果的回顾性研究[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2020, 25(2): 55-59.
[6]	陈儒娜, 符镇南, 张佩芬, 黄锦洪, 朱壮华. 挤压种植术对上颌后牙区Ⅲ类骨种植远期疗效及边缘骨吸收量的影响[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2019, 24(2): 59-62.
[7]	刘欣, 张晓聪, 胡铭轩, 林植楠, 王兆红, 谭媛元, Daria Zubova, 陈卓凡. 锥形骨水平内六角连接种植体短期临床效果和影像学结果：一项回顾性研究[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2019, 24(2): 77-81.
[8]	黄江琴, 王轶, 岑雯, 郭水根, 张越, 魏洪武. 种植体植入深度对边缘骨水平影响的临床研究[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2019, 24(1): 14-18.
[9]	郭水根, 岑雯, 王轶, 孟展, 黄江琴, 张越, 魏洪武. Bicon 种植体在后牙即刻种植的临床应用研究[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2018, 23(2): 66-69.

种植体-基台界面至冠-基台粘接界面距离对边缘骨吸收影响：4-5 年回顾性研究

The effect of the distance from the implant-abutment interface to the porcelain-abutment bonded interface on marginal bone loss: a 4-5 year retrospective study

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 9

编辑推荐

Metrics