锥形骨水平内六角连接种植体短期临床效果和影像学结果：一项回顾性研究

doi:10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2019.06.008

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的： 评估锥形骨水平内六角连接种植体的短期临床与影像学效果。方法： 选取在本院进行锥形骨水平内六角连接种植体(MIS SEVEN)修复并完成复诊的23例患者共68枚种植体,通过临床检查和X线片检查,评估种植体存留率和边缘骨吸收量。结果： 68枚种植体获得100%的存留率。修复后平均12.2个月复诊,近、远中边缘骨水平改变量分别为(0.02± 0.57)mm和(0.14± 0.57)mm。结论： 该锥形骨水平内六角连接种植体可以获得高的种植体存留率,种植体边缘骨水平相对稳定,短期临床应用效果可靠。

关键词: 锥形骨水平, 内六角连接, 边缘骨吸收, 存留率

Abstract: Objective： To retrospectively evaluate the short-term clinical and radiologic outcomes of a conical bone-level implant with internal hexagonal connection. Methods： A total of 68 conical bone-level im- plants(MIS SEVEN) with internal hexagonal connections inserted into 23 patients were included. Patients were followed up. The survival rate and the marginal bone loss were evaluated by clinical and radiologic examinations. Results： The implant survival rate is 100% within 68 implants. The medial and distal mar- ginal bone loss were(0.02±0.57) mm and (0.14±0.57) mm, respectively, during the average 12.2mouths fol- low-up. Conclusions： High implant survival rate was achieved by this conical bone-level implants with internal hexagonal connections. Marginal bone level was relatively stable. Short-term clinical outcomes were reliable.

Key words: conical bone-level, internal hexagonal connection, marginal bone loss, survival rate

中图分类号:

782.1

刘欣,张晓聪,胡铭轩,等. 锥形骨水平内六角连接种植体短期临床效果和影像学结果：一项回顾性研究[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2019, 24(2): 77-81. DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2019.06.008

LIU Xin, ZHANG Xiaocong, HU Mingxuan, et al. Clinical and radiologic outcomes of conical bone-level implants with internal hexagonal connections:a short-term retrospective study[J].Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2019, 24(2): 77-81.DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2019.06.008.

参考文献

[1] Kolte AP, Kolte RA, Mishra PR.Dimensional influ- ence of interproximal areas on existence of interdental papillae. J Periodontol, 2014, 85(6) : 795-801
[2] Albrektsson T, Jansson T, Lekholm U.Osseointegrat- ed dental implants. Dent Clin North Am, 1986, 30(1) : 151-74
[3] Huang B, Meng H, Piao M, et al.Influence of place- ment depth on bone remodeling around tapered internal connec- tion implant: a clinical and radiographic study in dogs. J Peri- odontol, 2012, 83(9) : 1164-1171
[4] de Medeiros RA, Pellizzer EP, Vechiato Filho AJ, et al. Evaluation of marginal bone loss of dental implants with inter- nal or external connections and its association with other vari- ables: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent, 2016, 116(4) : 501-6
[5] Gjelvold B, Chrcanovic BR, Bagewitz IC, et al.Es- thetic and Patient-Centered Outcomes of Single Implants: A Ret- rospective Study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2017, 32(5) : 1065-1073
[6] Zarandi A, Novin M.Marginal bone loss around plat- form-switched and non-platform switched implants after two years of placement: a clinical trial. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects, 2017, 11(1) : 26-29
[7] Wu S, Wu X, Shrestha R, et al.Clinical and Radio- logic Outcomes of Submerged and Nonsubmerged Bone-Level Implants with Internal Hexagonal Connections in Immediate Im- plantation: A 5-Year Retrospective Study. J Prosthodont, 2018, 27(2) : 101-107
[8] Pozzi A, Agliardi E, Tallarico M, et al.Clinical and radiological outcomes of two implants with different prosthetic in- terfaces and neck configurations: randomized, controlled, splitmouth clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2014, 16(1) : 96-106
[9] Calvo-Guirado JL, Gómez-Moreno G, Aguilar-Salva- tierra A, et al. Marginal bone loss evaluation around immediate non-occlusal microthreaded implants placed in fresh extraction sockets in the maxilla: a 3-year study. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2015, 26(7) : 761-7
[10] Baumgarten H, Cocchetto R, Testori T, et al.A new implant design for crestal bone preservation: initial observations and case report. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent, 2005, 17(10) : 735-40
[11] Lazzara RJ, Porter SS.Platform switching: a new con- cept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2006, 26(1) : 9-17
[12] Strietzel FP, Neumann K, Hertel M.Impact of plat- form switching on marginal peri-implant bone-level changes. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2015, 26(3) : 342-58
[13] Hsu YT, Lin GH, Wang HL.Effects of platformswitching on peri-implant soft and hard tissue outcomes: a sys- tematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Im- plants, 2017, 32(1) : e9-e24
[14] Pozzi A, Agliardi E, Tallarico M, et al.Clinical and radiological outcomes of two implants with different prosthetic in-terfaces and neck configurations: randomized, controlled, splitmouth clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2014, 16(1) : 96-106
[15] Pozzi A, Mura P.Immediate Loading of Conical Con- nection Implants: Up-to-2-Year Retrospective Clinical and Ra- diologic Study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2016, 31(1) : 142-52
[16] Bratu EA, Tandlich M, Shapira L.A rough surface implant neck with microthreads reduces the amount of marginal bone loss: a prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2009, 20(8) : 827-32
[17] Penarrocha-Diago MA, Flichy-Fernández AJ, Alonso-González R, et al.Influence of implant neck design and implant-abutment connection type on peri-implant health. Ra- diological study. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2013, 24(11) : 1192-200
[18] Niu W, Wang P, Zhu S, et al.Marginal bone loss around dental implants with and without microthreads in the neck: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent, 2017, 117(1) : 34-40
[19] Lozano-Carrascal N, Salomó - Coll O, Gilabert- Cerdà M, et al.Effect of implant macro-design on primary stabil- ity: A prospective clinical study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 2016, 21(2) : e214-21