不同颈圈对种植体边缘骨吸收影响的Meta分析

doi:10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2025.06.012

中国口腔种植学杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (3): 275-280.DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2025.06.012

不同颈圈对种植体边缘骨吸收影响的Meta分析

万克¹, 郝俊江², 宿瀚奇², 宿玉成^1,3,4

¹黑龙江省口腔生物医学材料及临床应用重点实验室佳木斯大学口腔医学工程实验中心佳木斯大学附属口腔医学院 154002;
²北京卡尔斯医疗器械有限公司 102600;
³北京瑞城口腔医院北京口腔种植培训中心（BITC） 100032;
⁴中国医学科学院北京协和医院口腔种植中心 100032

收稿日期:2024-07-16 出版日期:2025-06-30 发布日期:2025-06-27
通讯作者: 宿玉成,Email：yuchengsu@163.com,电话：010-66212299
作者简介:万克,硕士研究生在读,研究方向：口腔种植相关研究。
宿玉成,教授、主任医师、博士研究生导师,研究方向：口腔种植和口腔颌面外科

Influence of different implant collar designs on marginal bone resorption: a Meta-analysis

Wan Ke¹, Hao Junjiang², Su Hanqi², Su Yucheng^1,3,4

¹Key Laboratory of Oral Biomaterial Materials and Clinical Application, Heilongjiang Provincial, Experimental Center of Stomatology Engineering, Jiamusi University, Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Jiamusi University, Jiamusi 154002, Heilongjiang, China;
²Beijing CRS Medical Device Co., Ltd, Beijing 102600, China;
³Beijing Citident Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing Implant Training College (BITC), Beijing 100032, China;
⁴Dental Implant Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100032,China

Received:2024-07-16 Online:2025-06-30 Published:2025-06-27
Contact: Su Yucheng, Email: yuchengsu@163.com, Tel: 0086-10-66212299

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的系统评价种植体光滑颈圈与粗糙颈圈对种植体边缘骨吸收的影响。方法电子检索Embase、PubMed、知网、万方数据库并引文检索,检索时限为建库至2024年6月。由2名研究员独立筛选、审阅、评估相关文献,使用RevMan 5.4和Stata 15.0软件进行Meta分析。结果共纳入7篇文献,702颗种植体。Meta分析显示,粗糙颈圈组种植体边缘骨吸收明显小于光滑颈圈组[MD=0.34,95% CI（0.08,0.61）,P<0.05]。亚组分析显示,当种植体植入时间在12个月以内时,粗糙颈圈对种植体边缘骨保存的优势更加显著。结论基于现有证据表明,种植体粗糙颈圈相较于光滑颈圈更有利于种植体边缘骨的保存。

关键词: 光滑颈圈, 粗糙颈圈, 种植体, 边缘骨吸收, Meta分析

Abstract: Objective To systematically evaluate the effect of smooth and rough implant collars on marginal bone resorption. Methods A systematic search was conducted in Embase, PubMed, CNKI, and Wanfang databases from inception to June 2024. Two independent reviewers screened, analyzed, and assessed the relevant literature. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 and Stata 15.0. Results Seven studies, involving 702 implants, were included. The meta-analysis showed that marginal bone resorption in the rough collar group was significantly lower than in the smooth collar group [MD=0.34,95% CI (0.08,0.61),P<0.05]. Subgroup analysis showed that the advantage of the rough collar in preserving marginal bone was more significant when the implant placement duration was less than 12 months. Conclusion Based on the available data, the rough implant collar is more favorable for marginal bone preservation compared to the smooth collar.

Key words: Smooth collar, Rough collar, Dental implants, Marginal bone resorption, Meta-analysis

万克,郝俊江,宿瀚奇,等. 不同颈圈对种植体边缘骨吸收影响的Meta分析[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2025, 30(3): 275-280. DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2025.06.012

Wan Ke, Hao Junjiang, Su Hanqi, Su Yucheng. Influence of different implant collar designs on marginal bone resorption: a Meta-analysis[J].Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2025, 30(3): 275-280.DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2025.06.012.

参考文献

[1] Moraschini V, Poubel LA, Ferreira VF, et al.Evaluation of survival and success rates of dental implants reported in longitudinal studies with a follow-up period of at least 10 years: a systematic review[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2015, 44(3):377-388. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.10.023.
[2] Pjetursson BE, Thoma D, Jung R, et al.A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) after a mean observation period of at least 5 years[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2012, 23(Suppl 6):S22-S38. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02546.x.
[3] Göthberg C, Gröndahl K, Omar O, et al.Bone and soft tissue outcomes, risk factors, and complications of implant-supported prostheses: 5-years RCT with different abutment types and loading protocols[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2018, 20(3):313-321. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12587.
[4] 周炜, 宋应亮, 李德华, 等. 种植体骨结合稳定性测量及相关因素分析[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志, 2006, 22(6):803-806. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3733.2006.06.017.
Zhou W,Song YL, Li DH, et al.The stability of osseointegrated implants and the relative factors[J]. J Pract Stomatol,2006,22(6):803-806. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3733.2006.06.017.
[5] Baffone GM, Botticelli D, Pereira FP, et al.Influence of buccal bony crest width on marginal dimensions of peri-implant hard and soft tissues after implant installation. An experimental study in dogs[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res,2013,24(3):250-254. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02512.x.
[6] Bengazi F, Lang NP, Caroprese M, et al.Dimensional changes in soft tissues around dental implants following free gingival grafting: an experimental study in dogs[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2015, 26(2):176-182. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12280.
[7] 王蕾, 刘延山, 柏娜, 等. 平台转移技术对种植体周围组织影响的Meta分析[J]. 青岛大学学报(医学版), 2019, 55(2):206-210. DOI: 10.11712/jms201902019.
Wang L, Liu YS, Bai N, et al.Effect of platform switching on peri-implant tissue: a meta-analysis[J]. J Qingdao Univ (Med Sci) , 2019, 55(2):206-210. DOI: 10.11712/jms201902019.
[8] Pettersson P, Sennerby L.A 5-year retrospective study on replace select tapered dental implants[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2015, 17(2):286-295. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12105.
[9] Hsu YT, Chan HL, Rudek I, et al.Comparison of clinical and radiographic outcomes of platform-switched implants with a rough collar and platform-matched implants with a smooth collar: a 1-year randomized clinical trial[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2016, 31(2):382-390. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.4189.
[10] Oh TJ, Yoon J, Misch CE, et al.The causes of early implant bone loss: myth or science?[J]. J Periodontol, 2002, 73(3):322-333. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2002.73.3.322.
[11] 赖漪娆, 史俊宇, 赖红昌. 种植体光滑颈圈的临床应用[J]. 口腔医学, 2021, 41(8):746-750. DOI: 10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2021.08.015.
Lai LR, Shi JY, Lai HC.Clinical application of smooth-collared implant[J].Stomatology,2021, 41(8):746-750. DOI: 10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2021.08.015.
[12] Esposito M, Felice P, Barausse C, et al.Immediately loaded machined versus rough surface dental implants in edentulous jaws: one-year postloading results of a pilot randomised controlled trial[J]. Eur J Oral Implantol, 2015, 8(4):387-396.
[13] Rothamel D, Heinz M, Ferrari D, et al.Impact of machined versus structured implant shoulder designs on crestal bone level changes: a randomized, controlled, multicenter study[J]. Int J Implant Dent, 2022, 8(1):31. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-022-00432-4.
[14] Patil YB, Asopa SJ, Deepa, et al. Influence of implant neck design on crestal bone loss: a comparative study[J]. Niger J Surg, 2020, 26(1):22-27. DOI: 10.4103/njs.NJS_28_19.
[15] Randall EF, Abou-Arraj RV, Geurs N, et al.The effect of dental implant collar cesign on crestal bone loss at 1 year after implant placement[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2019, 39(2):165-173. DOI: 10.11607/prd.3516.
[16] Mendonça JA, Senna PM, Francischone CE, et al.Retrospective evaluation of the influence of the collar surface topography on peri-implant bone preservation[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2017, 32(4):858-863. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.4094.
[17] den Hartog L, Meijer H, Vissink A, et al. Anterior single implants with different neck designs: 5 year results of a randomized clinical trial[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2017, 19(4):717-724. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12498.
[18] Goswami MM.Comparison of crestal bone loss along two implant crest module designs[J]. Med J Armed Forces India, 2009, 65(4):319-322. DOI: 10.1016/S0377-1237(09)80091-9.
[19] Bratu EA, Tandlich M, Shapira L.A rough surface implant neck with microthreads reduces the amount of marginal bone loss: a prospective clinical study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2009, 20(8):827-832. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01730.x.
[20] Chen W, Zhi M, Feng Z, et al.Sustained co-delivery of ibuprofen and basic fibroblast growth factor by thermosensitive nanoparticle hydrogel as early local treatment of peri-implantitis[J]. Int J Nanomedicine, 2019, 14:1347-1358. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S190781.
[21] Sadrimanesh R, Siadat H, Sadr-Eshkevari P, et al.Alveolar bone stress around implants with different abutment angulation: an FE-analysis of anterior maxilla[J]. Implant Dent, 2012, 21(3):196-201. DOI: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31824c302e.
[22] Pierrisnard L, Renouard F, Renault P, et al.Influence of implant length and bicortical anchorage on implant stress distribution[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2003, 5(4):254-262. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00208.x.
[23] Novaes AB Jr, Papalexiou V, Muglia V, et al.Influence of interimplant distance on gingival papilla formation and bone resorption: clinical-radiographic study in dogs[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2006, 21(1):45-51.
[24] Shalabi MM, Wolke JG, Jansen JA.The effects of implant surface roughness and surgical technique on implant fixation in an in vitro model[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2006, 17(2):172-178. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01202.x.
[25] Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T.Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2009,20(Suppl 4):S172-S184. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01775.x.
[26] Hansson S.The implant neck: smooth or provided with retention elements. A biomechanical approach[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 1999,10(5):394-405. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1999.100506.x.
[27] Xu Y, Li H, Wu J, et al.Polydopamine-induced hydroxyapatite coating facilitates hydroxyapatite/ polyamide 66 implant osteogenesis: an in vitro and in vivo evaluation[J]. Int J Nanomedicine, 2018, 13:8179-8193. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S181137.
[28] Javed F, Ahmed HB, Crespi R, et al.Role of primary stability for successful osseointegration of dental implants: factors of influence and evaluation[J]. Interv Med Appl Sci, 2013, 5(4):162-167. DOI: 10.1556/IMAS.5.2013.4.3.
[29] Kulkarni M, Mazare A, Gongadze E, et al.Titanium nanostructures for biomedical applications[J]. Nanotechnology, 2015, 26(6):062002. DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/26/6/062002.
[30] Minagar S, Wang J, Berndt CC, et al.Cell response of anodized nanotubes on titanium and titanium alloys[J]. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2013, 101(9):2726-2739. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.34575.
[31] Refai AK, Textor M, Brunette DM, et al.Effect of titanium surface topography on macrophage activation and secretion of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines[J]. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2004, 70(2):194-205. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.30075.
[32] Schwarz F, Alcoforado G, Nelson K, et al.Impact of implant-abutment connection, positioning of the machined collar/microgap, and platform switching on crestal bone level changes. Camlog foundation consensus report[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2014,25(11):1301-1303. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12269.
[33] Tomar S, Saxena D, Kaur N. Marginal bone loss around implants with platform switching and platform matched connection: a systematic review[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2023: S0022-3913(23)00622-00624 [pii]. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.09.009.

不同颈圈对种植体边缘骨吸收影响的Meta分析

Influence of different implant collar designs on marginal bone resorption: a Meta-analysis

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	周延民, 罗嘉欣. 短种植体在无牙上颌种植中的应用[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2025, 30(3): 209-216.
[2]	李昕茹, 曹泽鹏, 刘一伯, 韩泽奎, 周立波. 不同螺纹种植体即刻种植即刻负荷的比格犬体内实验[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2025, 30(3): 255-261.
[3]	孙雨欣, 施斌, 吴涛. 种植体周炎在鼠类实验模型构建的研究进展[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2025, 30(3): 281-287.
[4]	陈刚, 赵鑫, 钟飞, 顾红政. 基于微生态失调的种植体周疾病及干预策略[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2025, 30(3): 296-304.
[5]	付丽, 周延民. 富血小板纤维蛋白在种植体周围软组织增量中的应用研究[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2025, 30(2): 98-105.
[6]	杨蕊, 许志杰. 基于病因分析的种植体周炎综合序列治疗1例[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2025, 30(2): 161-168.
[7]	蔡雯昱, 马骏驰, 赵文博, 王一茗, 周立波. 种植体构型设计的特点与临床应用现状[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2025, 30(2): 180-186.
[8]	王芬英, 李静, 徐雪. 基质金属蛋白酶-7、8在种植体周炎患者种植体周黏膜沟液中的表达及临床意义[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2025, 30(1): 62-67.
[9]	王喻. 乳酸链球菌素特性及在种植体周炎中应用的研究进展[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2025, 30(1): 86-90.
[10]	李美琪, 孙晓琳, 王林. 益生菌在口腔种植体周疾病中的应用[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2025, 30(1): 91-96.
[11]	周文洁, 吴轶群. 侧壁开窗上颌窦底提升愈合早期种植的可行性分析：一项前瞻性临床对照研究[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2024, 29(6): 524-530.
[12]	刘奇奇, 赵雨佳, 邱林, 郝俊江, 宿瀚奇, 韩泽奎, 王心彧, 宿玉成. 不同喷砂参数对医用四级纯钛表面粗糙度的影响[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2024, 29(6): 555-560.
[13]	陆怡凡, 罗洪科, 陈谦明, 姒蜜思. 因牙周炎面临失牙的患者牙周基础治疗后即刻种植的临床研究进展[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2024, 29(6): 574-579.
[14]	杜奥博, 满毅. 美学区分阶段骨增量联合邻牙显微根尖手术的治疗策略：临床诊治流程及实践病例[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2024, 29(5): 440-444.
[15]	方利, 陈梓俊, 邓邦莲, 宋应亮. 咬合调整联合激光治疗种植体周炎的研究进展[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2024, 29(5): 480-485.