Research progress on peri-implant soft tissue augmentation materials

doi:10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2024.06.015

Abstract

Abstract: With the increasing maturity of dental implant technology, the aesthetic effects of dental implants and long-term health of surrounding tissues in implant restorations are of growing concern. Due to the decrease in the amount of soft and hard tissue around the missing tooth area, dental defects often fail to meet the requirements for implant restoration. Therefore, the augmentation of soft and hard tissue around the implant is a key step in dental implantation. The purpose of this paper is to introduce common peri-implant soft tissue augmentation materials and provide references to solving the problem of peri-implant soft tissue insufficiency.

Key words: Dental implant, Autografting, Soft tissue augmentation materials

Chen Jiaxin, Gu Xinhua. Research progress on peri-implant soft tissue augmentation materials[J]. Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2024, 29(3): 284-288.

References

[1] Puzio M, Hadzik J, Błaszczyszyn A, et al.Soft tissue augmentation around dental implants with connective tissue graft (CTG) and xenogenic collagen matrix (XCM). 1-year randomized control trail[J]. Ann Anat, 2020,230:151484. DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2020.151484.
[2] Perussolo J, Souza AB, Matarazzo F, et al.Influence of the keratinized mucosa on the stability of peri-implant tissues and brushing discomfort: a 4-year follow-up study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2018,29(12):1177-1185. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13381.
[3] Avila-Ortiz G, Gonzalez-Martin O, Couso-Queiruga E, et al.The peri-implant phenotype[J]. J Periodontol, 2020,91(3):283-288. DOI: 10.1002/JPER.19-0566.
[4] Zuiderveld EG, Meijer H, den Hartog L, et al. Effect of connective tissue grafting on peri-implant tissue in single immediate implant sites: a RCT[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2018,45(2):253-264. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12820.
[5] Bonino F, Steffensen B, Natto Z, et al.Prospective study of the impact of peri-implant soft tissue properties on patient-reported and clinically assessed outcomes[J]. J Periodontol, 2018,89(9):1025-1032. DOI: 10.1002/JPER.18-0031.
[6] Marzadori M, Stefanini M, Mazzotti C, et al.Soft-tissue augmentation procedures in edentulous esthetic areas[J]. Periodontol 2000, 2018,77(1):111-122. DOI: 10.1111/prd.12210.
[7] Roccuzzo M, Grasso G, Dalmasso P.Keratinized mucosa around implants in partially edentulous posterior mandible: 10-year results of a prospective comparative study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2016,27(4):491-496. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12563.
[8] Tavelli L, Barootchi S, Avila-Ortiz G, et al.Peri-implant soft tissue phenotype modification and its impact on peri-implant health: a systematic review and network meta-analysis[J]. J Periodontol, 2021,92(1):21-44. DOI: 10.1002/JPER.19-0716.
[9] Zucchelli G, Tavelli L, McGuire MK, et al. Autogenous soft tissue grafting for periodontal and peri-implant plastic surgical reconstruction[J]. J Periodontol, 2020,91(1):9-16. DOI: 10.1002/JPER.19-0350.
[10] Li P, Li L, Chen HA, et al.Subepithelial connective tissue grafts to improve tissue biotype control in peri-implant disease: a case series[J]. Chin J Dent Res, 2020,23(2):151-156. DOI: 10.3290/j.cjdr.a44751.
[11] Sanz-Martín I, Rojo E, Maldonado E, et al.Structural and histological differences between connective tissue grafts harvested from the lateral palatal mucosa or from the tuberosity area[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2019,23(2):957-964. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-018-2516-9.
[12] Akcalı A, Schneider D, Ünlü F, et al.Soft tissue augmentation of ridge defects in the maxillary anterior area using two different methods: a randomized controlled clinical trial[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2015,26(6):688-695. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12368.
[13] Kulkarni MR, Bhatavadekar NB, Setty SB, et al.A double lateral pedicle graft technique for palatal recession coverage on dental implants[J]. J Indian Soc Periodontol, 2023,27(5):536-540. DOI: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_379_22.
[14] Papapetros D, Karagiannis V, Konstantinidis A, et al.Interim tissue changes following connective tissue grafting and two-stage implant placement. A randomized clinical trial[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2019,46(9):958-968. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13159.
[15] Zang J, Su L, Luan Q, et al.Clinical and histological evaluation of the use of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) membrane in peri-implant vertical soft tissue augmentation: a controlled clinical trial[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2022,33(6):586-597. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13919.
[16] de Resende D, Greghi S, Siqueira AF, et al. Acellular dermal matrix allograft versus free gingival graft: a histological evaluation and split-mouth randomized clinical trial[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2019,23(2):539-550. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-018-2470-6.
[17] Shi Y, Segelnick SL, El Chaar ES.A modified technique of tacking acellular dermal matrix to increase keratinized mucosa around dental implants as an alternative to a free gingival graft: a case report[J]. Clin Adv Periodontics, 2020,10(4):175-180. DOI: 10.1002/cap.10113.
[18] Papi P, Penna D, Di Murro B, et al.Clinical and volumetric analysis of peri-implant soft tissue augmentation using an acellular dermal matrix: a prospective cohort study[J]. J Periodontol, 2021,92(6):803-813. DOI: 10.1002/JPER.20-0219.
[19] Kanafi AR, Shiezadeh F, Fatemi K, et al.Effect of acellular dermal matrix placement simultaneous with implant placement on vertical soft tissue thickness: a randomized controlled clinical trial[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2023,43(3):e149-e155. DOI: 10.11607/prd.5837.
[20] Kuo S, Kim HM, Wang Z, et al.Comparison of two decellularized dermal equivalents[J]. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 2018,12(4):983-990. DOI: 10.1002/term.2530.
[21] Jain A, Jaiswal GR, Kumathalli K, et al. Comparative evaluation of platelet rich fibrin and dehydrated amniotic membrane for the treatment of gingival recession- a clinical study[J]. J Clin Diagn Res, 2017,11(8):ZC24-ZC28. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/29599.10362.
[22] Jahanafrooz Z, Bakhshandeh B, Behnam Abdollahi S, et al.Human amniotic membrane as a multifunctional biomaterial: recent advances and applications[J]. J Biomater Appl, 2023,37(8):1341-1354. DOI: 10.1177/08853282221137609.
[23] Zhang Q, Qian C, Xiao W, et al.Development of a visible light, cross-linked GelMA hydrogel containing decellularized human amniotic particles as a soft tissue replacement for oral mucosa repair[J]. RSC Adv, 2019,9(32):18344-18352. DOI: 10.1039/c9ra03009c.
[24] De Angelis N, Kassim ZH, Frosecchi M, et al.Expansion of the zone of keratinized tissue for healthy implant abutment interface using de-epithelialized amnion/chorion allograft[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2019,39(3):e83-e88. DOI: 10.11607/prd.3757.
[25] Kroiss S, Rathe F, Sader R, et al.Acellular dermal matrix allograft versus autogenous connective tissue grafts for thickening soft tissue and covering multiple gingival recessions: a 5-year preference clinical study[J]. Quintessence Int, 2019,50(4):278-285. DOI: 10.3290/j.qi.a42160.
[26] Qiu X, Li X, Li F, et al.Xenogeneic collagen matrix versus free gingival graft for augmenting keratinized mucosa around posterior mandibular implants: a randomized clinical trial[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2023,27(5):1953-1964. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-022-04853-8.
[27] Ramanauskaite A, Obreja K, Müller KM, et al.Three-dimensional changes of a porcine collagen matrix and free gingival grafts for soft tissue augmentation to increase the width of keratinized tissue around dental implants: a randomized controlled clinical study[J]. Int J Implant Dent, 2023,9(1):13. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-023-00482-2.
[28] Schmitt CM, Brückbauer P, Schlegel KA, et al.Volumetric soft tissue alterations in the early healing phase after peri- implant soft tissue contour augmentation with a porcine collagen matrix versus the autologous connective tissue graft: a controlled clinical trial[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2021,48(1):145-162. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13387.
[29] Cairo F, Barbato L, Tonelli P, et al.Xenogeneic collagen matrix versus connective tissue graft for buccal soft tissue augmentation at implant site. A randomized, controlled clinical trial[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2017,44(7):769-776. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12750.
[30] Lim HC, Kim CH, Lee HK, et al.Effect of polydeoxyribonucleotide with xenogeneic collagen matrix on gingival phenotype modification: a pilot preclinical study[J]. J Periodontal Implant Sci, 2023,53(6):417-428. DOI: 10.5051/jpis.2301920096.
[31] Verardi S, Orsini M, Lombardi T, et al.Comparison between two different techniques for peri-implant soft tissue augmentation: porcine dermal matrix graft versus tenting screw[J]. J Periodontol, 2020,91(8):1011-1017. DOI: 10.1002/JPER.19-0447.
[32] Hadzik J, Błaszczyszyn A, Gedrange T, et al.Soft-tissue augmentation around dental implants with a connective tissue graft (CTG) and xenogeneic collagen matrix (CMX)-5-year follow-up[J]. J Clin Med, 2023,12(3):924. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12030924.
[33] Tavelli L, McGuire MK, Zucchelli G, et al. Extracellular matrix-based scaffolding technologies for periodontal and peri-implant soft tissue regeneration[J]. J Periodontol, 2020,91(1):17-25. DOI: 10.1002/JPER.19-0351.
[34] Lin Z, Nica C, Sculean A, et al.Enhanced wound healing potential of primary human oral fibroblasts and periodontal ligament cells cultured on four different porcine-derived collagen matrices[J]. Materials (Basel), 2020,13(17):3819. DOI: 10.3390/ma13173819.
[35] Asparuhova MB, Stähli A, Guldener K, et al.A novel volume-stable collagen matrix induces changes in the behavior of primary human oral fibroblasts, periodontal ligament, and endothelial cells[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2021,22(8):4051. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22084051.
[36] Caballé-Serrano J, Zhang S, Sculean A, et al.Tissue integration and degradation of a porous collagen-based scaffold used for soft tissue augmentation[J]. Materials (Basel), 2020,13(10):2420. DOI: 10.3390/ma13102420.
[37] Thoma DS, Strauss FJ, Mancini L, et al.Minimal invasiveness in soft tissue augmentation at dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis of patient-reported outcome measures[J]. Periodontol 2000, 2023,91(1):182-198. DOI: 10.1111/prd.12465.
[38] Hämmerle C, Jepsen K, Sailer I, et al.Efficacy of a collagen matrix for soft tissue augmentation after implant placement compared to connective tissue grafts: a multicenter, noninferiority, randomized controlled trial[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2023,34(9):999-1013. DOI: 10.1111/clr.14127.
[39] Cosyn J, Eeckhout C, Christiaens V, et al.A multi-centre randomized controlled trial comparing connective tissue graft with collagen matrix to increase soft tissue thickness at the buccal aspect of single implants: 3-month results[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2021,48(12):1502-1515. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13560.
[40] Giannini S, Cielo A, Bonanome L, et al.Comparison between PRP, PRGF and PRF: lights and shadows in three similar but different protocols[J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2015,19(6):927-930.
[41] Al-Diasty Z, El-Meadawy S, Salem AS, et al.Onlay platelet-rich fibrin membrane versus free gingival graft in increasing the width of keratinized mucosa around dental implants: a split-mouth randomized clinical study[J]. J Adv Periodontol Implant Dent, 2022,14(2):53-61. DOI: 10.34172/japid.2022.013.
[42] Ustaoğlu G, Paksoy T, Gümüş KÇ.Titanium-prepared platelet-rich fibrin versus connective tissue graft on peri-implant soft tissue thickening and keratinized mucosa width: a randomized, controlled trial[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2020,78(7):1112-1123. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.02.019.
[43] Bouri A Jr, Bissada N, Al-Zahrani MS, et al.Width of keratinized gingiva and the health status of the supporting tissues around dental implants[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2008,23(2):323-326.
[44] 朱秋艳. 影响嵴顶区软组织厚度的相关因素分析及临床干预研究 [D].昆明:昆明医科大学,2023. DOI:10.27202/d.cnki.gkmyc.2023.000353
[45] Yu SH, Tseng SC, Wang HL.Classification of soft tissue grafting materials based on biologic principles[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2018,38(6):849-854. DOI: 10.11607/prd.3622.
[46] Liu P, Li Q, Yang Q, et al.Evaluation of the effect of 3D-bioprinted gingival fibroblast-encapsulated ADM scaffolds on keratinized gingival augmentation[J]. J Periodontal Res, 2023,58(3):564-574. DOI: 10.1111/jre.13126.