Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology ›› 2023, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (5): 351-357.DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2023.10.010

• Meta Analysis • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Meta-analysis of tenting technique for alveolar ridge augmentation

Gong Jiaming1,2, Zhao Ruimin1,2, Lang Xin3, Yu Zhanhai3, Yuan Zhenfei1   

  1. 1Department of Stomatology, Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (Quzhou People’s Hospital), Quzhou 324000, China;
    2Department of Stomatology, The 940th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of People’s Liberation Army, Lanzhou 730050, China;
    3School & Hospital of Stomatology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
  • Received:2023-01-09 Online:2023-10-30 Published:2023-11-07
  • Contact: Yuan Zhenfei, Email: zhenfeiyuan@sina.com, Tel: 0086-570-8895120
  • Supported by:
    Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LY15H140007); Zhejiang Medicine and Health Science and Technology Plan Project (2018KY878)

Abstract: Objective To systematically evaluate the efficacy of applying the tent technique (TT) in alveolar ridge augmentation. Methods The PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, and SinoMed databases were electronically searched from April 1, 2002 to October 10, 2022 to identify clinical trials that employed TT in alveolar ridge augmentation. Results A total of 9 studies were included, of which 7 referred to horizontal ridge augmentation and 2 referred to vertical ridge augmentation. Meta-analysis indicated that TT had similar performance in horizontal ridge augmentation [MD=0.89, 95% CI (-0.07, 1.85), P=0.07] and postoperative complications compared with guided bone regeneration (GBR) [RR=3.90, 95% CI (0.85, 17.96), P=0.08]. Furthermore, TT had significantly less bone resorption than GBR and Onlay graft [MD=-3.98, 95% CI (-6.32, -1.65), P=0.0008], which could obtain more vertical ridge augmentation than the latter [MD=1.09, 95% CI (0.38, 1.81), P=0.003]. In terms of implant placement rate, their performance was as expected. Conclusion TT, as an alternative technique for alveolar ridge augmentation, achieves similar or better bone incremental performance than GBR or Onlay graft.

Key words: Tenting technique, Alveolar ridge augmentation, Bone graft, Dental implant, Meta-analysis