Expert consensus on bone grafting materials for maxillary sinus floor elevation: bone substitutes

doi:10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2023.02.002

Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology ›› 2023, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (1): 3-8.DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2023.02.002

• Guidelines & Consensus • Previous Articles Next Articles

Expert consensus on bone grafting materials for maxillary sinus floor elevation: bone substitutes

Chinese Society of Oral Implantology

Writing authors: Zhou Wenjie (Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine); Wang Feng (Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine); Wu Yiqun (Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine)
Authors: Wu Yiqun (Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine); Chen Zhuofan (Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University); Lan Jing (Stomatological Hospital, Shandong University); Wang Liping (Affiliated Stomatology Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University); Zou Derong (Sixth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine); Zhou Yanmin (Hospital of Stomatology, Jilin University); Su Yucheng(Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences)
List of expert groups for comments (ranked by Chinese phonetic alphabet of surnames): Chen Zhuofan, Chen Zetao, Huang Wei, Lan Jing, Li Chaolun, Su Yucheng, Wang Feng, Wang Liping, Wang Yueping, Zhang Zhiyong, Wu Yiqun, Zou Derong, Zhou Yanmin

Received:2022-08-11 Online:2023-02-28 Published:2023-03-07
Contact: Wu Yiqun, Second Dental Center, Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 201999, China, Email: yiqunwu@hotmail.com, Tel:0086-21-56152705; Su Yucheng, Dental Implant Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100032, China, Email: yuchengsu@163.com, Tel:0086-10-66212299

Abstract

Abstract: Autogenous bone has long been considered the "gold standard" for maxillary sinus floor elevation. However, secondary iatrogenic injury, limited source, easy resorption, and high risk of complications at donor sites limit its clinical application. Thus, the search for and selection of an ideal bone substitute for autologous bone becomes the development trend of bone augmentation technique. In this paper, the characteristics of three major bone substitutes including allograft, xenograft, and alloplastic graft, as well as the implant survival rate after the above bone substitutes were used on the maxillary sinus floor were summarized.

Key words: Maxillary sinus floor elevation, Bone grafting materials, Expert consensus, Allograft, Xenograft, Alloplastic graft

Chinese Society of Oral Implantology. Expert consensus on bone grafting materials for maxillary sinus floor elevation: bone substitutes[J]. Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2023, 28(1): 3-8.

References

[1] Daniel Buser.30 years of guided bone regeneration.third edition[M]. Batavia, IL : Quintessence Publishing Co, 2021.
[2] Wu Y,Wang F, Zhou W.An update on current and innovative materials and techniques used for maxillary sinus floor elevation procedures[J]. Forum Implantologicum, 2021,17(2):132-143.
[3] 宿玉成. 《口腔种植学词典》. 第一版[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2020.
[4] Younes R, Nader N, Khoury G.Sinus grafting techniques: a step-by-step guide[M]. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019.
[5] Aghaloo TL, Moy PK.Which hard tissue augmentation techniques are the most successful in furnishing bony support for implant placement?[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2007, 22(Suppl):49-70.
[6] Del Fabbro M, Rosano G, Taschieri S.Implant survival rates after maxillary sinus augmentation[J]. Eur J Oral Sci, 2008, 116:497-506. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00571.x.
[7] Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Rees J, et al. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: augmentation procedures of the maxillary sinus[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2010, 3:CD008397. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008397.
[8] Jensen SS, Terheyden H.Bone augmentation procedures in localized defects in the alveolar ridge: clinical results with different bone grafts and bone-substitute materials[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2009, 24(Suppl):218-236.
[9] Pjetursson BE, Tan WC, Zwahlen M, et al.A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2008,35:216-240. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01272.x.
[10] Trimmel B, Gede N, Hegyi P, et al.Relative performance of various biomaterials used for maxillary sinus augmentation: a bayesian network meta-analysis[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2021, 32(2):135-153. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13690.
[11] Stumbras A, Krukis MM, Januzis G, et al.Regenerative bone potential after sinus floor elevation using various bone graft materials: a systematic review[J]. Quintessence Int, 2019, 50(7):548-558. DOI: 10.3290/j.qi.a42482.
[12] Al-Moraissi EA, Alkhutari AS, Abotaleb B, et al.Do osteoconductive bone substitutes result in similar bone regeneration for maxillary sinus augmentation when compared to osteogenic and osteoinductive bone grafts? A systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2020, 49(1):107-120. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2019.05.004.
[13] 宿玉成. 《口腔种植学》. 第二版[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2014.
[14] Corbella S, Taschieri S, Weinstein R, et al.Histomorphometric outcomes after lateral sinus floor elevation procedure: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis[J]. Clin Oral Impl Res, 2016, 27:1106-1122. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12702.
[15] Danesh-Sani SA, Engebretson SP, Janal MN.Histomorphometric results of different grafting materials and effect of healing time on bone maturation after sinus floor augmentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Periodontal Res, 2017, 52(3):301-312. DOI: 10.1111/jre.12402.
[16] Wang F, Zhou W, Monje A, et al.Influence of healing period upon bone turn over on maxillary sinus floor augmentation grafted solely with deproteinized bovine bone mineral: a prospective human histological and clinical trial[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2017,19(2):341-350.
[17] Hatano N, Shimizu Y, Ooya K.A clinical long-term radiographic evaluation of graft height changes after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with a 2:1 autogenous bone/xenograft mixture and simultaneous placement of dental implants[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2004, 15:339-345. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.00996.x.
[18] Hallman M, Sennerby L, Lundgren S.A clinical and histologic evaluation of implant integration in the posterior maxilla after sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone, bovine hydroxyapatite, or a 20:80 mixture[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2002,17:635-643.
[19] Ewers R, Goriwoda W, Schopper C, et al.Histologic findings at augmented bone areas supplied with two different bone substitute materials combined with sinus floor lifting. Report of one case[J]. Clin Oral ants Res, 2004, 15:96-100.
[20] Schlegel AK, Donath K.BIO-OSS-a resorbable bone substitute?[J]. J Long Term Eff Med Implants, 1998, 8:201-209.
[21] Lezzi G, Degidi M, Scarano A, et al.Anorganic bone matrix retrieved 14 years after a sinus augmentation procedure: a histologic and histomorphometric evaluation[J]. J Periodontol, 2007, 78:2057-2061. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2007.070062.
[22] Graziani F, Donos N, Needleman I, et al.Comparison of implant survival following sinus floor augmentation procedures with implants placed in pristine posterior maxillary bone: a systematic review[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2004, 15:677-682. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01116.x.
[23] Del Fabbro M, Testori T, Francetti L, et al.Systematic review of survival rates for implants placed in the grafted maxillary sinus[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2004, 24:565-577.
[24] Del Fabbro M, Wallace SS, Testori T.Long-term implant survival in the grafted maxillary sinus: a systematic review[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2013, 33:773-783.
[25] Al-Nawas B, Schiegnitz E. Augmentation procedures using bone substitute materials or autogenous bone-a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Eur J Oral Implantol, 2014,7 Suppl 2:S219-234.
[26] Starch-Jensen T, Aludden H, Hallman M, et al.A systematic review and meta-analysis of long-term studies (five or more years) assessing maxillary sinus floor augmentation[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2018,47(1):103-116. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.05.001.
[27] 王振铭,叶玲. 生物活性组织工程材料在口腔颌面部骨修复中的应用研究进展[J]. 口腔生物医学,2021,12(2):71-76. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8603.2021.02.001.

Expert consensus on bone grafting materials for maxillary sinus floor elevation: bone substitutes

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

[1]	Gong Jiaming, Zhao Ruimin, Zhang Qihang, Yu Zhanhai, Su Linhan. The autologous platelet concentrates for maxillary sinus floor elevation: an overview of systematic reviews [J]. Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2023, 28(2): 102-108.
[2]	Zhou Yanmin, Zhu Yuemeng. Construction of the 3-dimensional osteogenesis model for maxillary sinus [J]. Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2023, 28(1): 9-18.
[3]	Deng Lei, Huang Haitao. Progress in the study of osteogenesis after maxillary sinus floor elevation [J]. Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2023, 28(1): 53-57.
[4]	Chinese Society of Oral Implantology. Expert consensus on bone grafting materials for sinus floor elevation: bioactive agents, cell therapies and graft-free sinus floor elevation [J]. Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2022, 27(6): 329-333.
[5]	Chinese Society of Oral Implantology. Expert consensus on complications of sinus floor elevation: displacement of dental implant into the maxillary sinus (first edition) [J]. Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2022, 27(5): 264-268.
[6]	Chinese Society of Oral Implantology. Expert consensus on bone grafting materials for maxillary sinus floor elevation: autogenous bone [J]. Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2022, 27(5): 269-273.
[7]	Chinese Society of Oral Implantology. Expert consensus on complications of sinus floor elevation：benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (first edition) [J]. Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2022, 27(4): 204-207.
[8]	Wang Tingting, Wang Feng, Wu Yiqun. Clinical application of three-dimensional printed digital customized titanium mesh in guided bone regeneration for alveolar bone reconstruction [J]. Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2022, 27(4): 208-216.
[9]	Chinese Society of Oral Implantology. Expert consensus on complications of sinus floor elevation：peri-implant disease (first edition) [J]. Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2022, 27(3): 135-139.
[10]	Chinese Society of Oral Implantology. Expert consensus on complications of sinus floor elevation: sinus infection and sinus graft infection (first edition) [J]. Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2022, 27(2): 71-74.
[11]	Chinese Society of Oral Implantology. Expert consensus on complications of sinus floor elevation: bleeding (first edition) [J]. Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2021, 26(6): 345-348.
[12]	Chinese Society of Oral Implantology. Expert consensus on the management of sinus floor elevation mucoperiosteum perforation (first edition) [J]. Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2021, 26(5): 277-281.
[13]	Zhang wen, Gu Xinhua. Research progress of bone window design for maxillary sinus floor elevation through lateral window approach [J]. Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2021, 26(5): 334-338.
[14]	Wu Yuepen, Gu Xinhua. A review of bone augmentation materials in maxillary sinus floor elevation [J]. Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2021, 26(4): 258-263.
[15]	Deng Lei, Huang Haitao. Research progress of grafting marterials in maxillary sinus floor elevation [J]. Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2021, 26(3): 192-195.