Digital data acquisition technology in oral implantology

doi:10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2021.04.007

Abstract

Abstract: With the rapid development of digital technology, diagnosis and treatment methods of the clinicians have been changed by these digital technologies in the field of dental implant. In particular, data acquisition technology, such as CBCT, digital intraoral scan, extraoral scan, facial scan, virtual facebow technique, are gradually popularized in medical institutions with its high precision, high efficiency, convenient transmission and low pollution. Recently, it has become one of the focuses to build "virtual patient" using various digital data to solve complex cases such as edentulous patients in implant dentistry. This paper summarized the characteristics and clinical application of digital data acquisition technology in the process of dental implant treatment.

Key words: Digital technology, Dental implant, Data acquisition, Scan, Virtual patient

Xiong Jiabi, Sun Wei, Shi Bin. Digital data acquisition technology in oral implantology[J]. Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2021, 26(2): 114-119.

References

[1] Creagh J, Bohner L, Sesma N, et al.Integrating a facially driven treatment planning to the digital workflow for rehabilitation of edentulous arches: a case report[J]. J Contemp Dent Pract, 2020,21(12):1393-1397.
[2] Fukami K, Shiozaki K, Mishima A, et al.Bifid mandibular canal: confirmation of limited cone beam CT findings by gross anatomical and histological investigations[J]. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 2012,41(6):460-465. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/60245722.
[3] Aksoy U, Aksoy S, Orhan K.A cone-beam computed tomography study of the anatomical relationships between mandibular teeth and the mandibular canal, with a review of the current literature[J]. Microsc Res Tech, 2018,81(3):308-314. DOI: 10.1002/jemt.22980.
[5] Van Dessel J, Nicolielo LF, Huang Y, et al.Accuracy and reliability of different cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices for structural analysis of alveolar bone in comparison with multislice CT and micro-CT[J]. Eur J Oral Implantol, 2017,10(1):95-105.
[5] de Castro HS, Kehrwald R, Matheus RA, et al.Influence of low-dose protocols of CBCT on dental implant planning[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2021,36(2):307-312. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.8773.
[6] Dusseldorp JK, Stamatakis HC, Ren Y.Soft tissue coverage on the segmentation accuracy of the 3D surface-rendered model from cone-beam CT[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2017,21(3):921-930. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-016-1844-x.
[7] Nagarajappa AK, Dwivedi N, Tiwari R.Artifacts: The downturn of CBCT image[J]. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent, 2015,5(6):440-445. DOI: 10.4103/2231-0762.170523.
[8] Al-Rimawi A, Shaheen E, Albdour EA, et al.Trueness of cone beam computed tomography versus intra-oral scanner derived three-dimensional digital models: An ex vivo study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2019,30(6):498-504. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13434.
[9] Skjerven H, Olsen-Bergem H, Rønold HJ, et al.Comparison of postoperative intraoral scan versus cone beam computerised tomography to measure accuracy of guided implant placement-A prospective clinical study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2019,30(6):531-541. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13438.
[10] Schnutenhaus S, Knipper A, Wetzel M, et al.Accuracy of computer-assisted dynamic navigation as a function of different intraoral reference systems: an in vitro study[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2021,18(6). DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18063244.
[11] Gómez-Polo M, Ballesteros J, Padilla PP, et al.Merging intraoral scans and CBCT: a novel technique for improving the accuracy of 3D digital models for implant- supportedcomplete-arch fixed dental prostheses[J]. Int J Comput Dent, 2021,24(2):117-123.
[12] Jamjoom FZ, Yilmaz B, Johnston WM.Impact of number of registration points on thepositional accuracy of a prosthetic treatment plan incorporated into a cone beam computed tomography scan by surface scan registration: An in vitro study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2019,30(8):826-832. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13490.
[13] Mandelli F, Ferrini F, Gastaldi G, et al.Improvement of a digital impression withconventional materials: overcoming intraoral ocanner limitations[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2017,30(4):373-376. DOI: 10.11607/ijp.5138.
[14] Schepke U, Meijer HJ, Kerdijk W, et al.Digital versus analog complete-arch impressions forsingle-unit premolar implant crowns: Operating time and patient preference[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2015,114(3):403-406.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.003.
[15] Gallardo YR, Bohner L, Tortamano P, et al.Patient outcomes and procedure working time fordigital versus conventional impressions: A systematic review[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2018,119(2):214-219. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.07.007.
[16] Amin S, Weber HP, Finkelman M, et al.Digital vs.conventional full-arch implant impressions: a comparative study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2017,28(11):1360-1367. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12994.
[17] Marghalani A, Weber HP, Finkelman M, et al.Digital versus conventional implant impressions for partially edentulous arches: An evaluation of accuracy[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2018,119(4):574-579. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.07.002.
[18] Iturrate M, Minguez R, Pradies G, et al.Obtaining reliable intraoral digital scans for an implant-supported complete-arch prosthesis: A dental technique[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2019,121(2):237-241. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.03.008.
[19] Andriessen FS, Rijkens DR, van der Meer WJ, et al.Applicability and accuracy of an intraoral scanner for scanning multiple implants in edentulous mandibles: a pilot study[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2014,111(3):186-194. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.07.010.
[20] Wismeijer D, Joda T, Flügge T, et al.Group 5 ITI consensus report: digital technologies[J] Clin Oral Implants Res, 2018,29 Suppl 16:436-442. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13309.
[21] Nagy Z, Simon B, Mennito A, et al.Comparing the trueness of seven intraoral scanners and a physical impression on dentate human maxilla by a novel method[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2020,20(1):97. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-020-01090-x.
[22] Wei D, Di P, Tian J, et al.Evaluation of intraoral digital impressions for obtaining gingival contour in the esthetic zone: accuracy outcomes[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2020,24(4):1401-1410. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-019-03105-6.
[23] da Silva Marques DN, Marques Pinto RJ, Alves R, et al.Soft tissue replication in single unit implant impressions-A three dimensional clinical study[J]. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2019,31(4):359-368. DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12481.
[24] Duran JC, Aguirre F, Pino R, et al.Dimensional variations in the soft tissue profile after removal of implant-supported fixed interim restorations: a pilot clinical study[J]. Implant Dent, 2018,27(1):28-32. DOI: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000720.
[25] Stefanelli LV, Franchina A, Pagliarulo M, et al.Management of a complex case during COVID-19 time using one-day digital dentistry: a dase report[J]. J Contemp Dent Pract, 2020,21(11):1284-1292.
[26] Zimmermann M, Mehl A.Virtual smile design systems: a current review[J]. Int J Comput Dent, 2015,18(4):303-317.
[27] Katase H, Kanazawa M, Inokoshi M, et al.Face simulation system for complete dentures by applying rapid prototyping[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2013,109(6):353-360. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60316-9.
[28] 杨敏, 刘福祥.激光扫描在头面部软组织三维重建和测量中的应用[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志,2010,37(3):351-354. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5749.2010.03.030.
[29] Zhao YJ, Xiong YX, Wang Y.Three-dimensional accuracy of facial scan for facial deformities in clinics: a new evaluation method for facial scanner accuracy[J]. PLoS One, 2017,12(1):e0169402. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169402.
[30] Ritschl LM, Wolff KD, Erben P, et al.Simultaneous, radiation-free registration of the dentoalveolar position and the face by combining 3D photography with a portable scanner and impression-taking[J]. Head Face Med, 2019,15(1):28. DOI: 10.1186/s13005-019- 0212-x.
[31] Marchack BW, Sharma A, Lefebvre CA.The journal of prosthetic dentistry: a historical perspective[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2018,119(4):497-498. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.02.009.
[32] Amornvit P, Sanohkan S.The accuracy of digital face scans obtained from 3D scanners: an In vitro study[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2019,16(24). DOI: 10.3390/ijerph 16245061.
[33] 孙方方, 张丽仙, 吴国锋.下颌运动轨迹记录的数字化技术[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志,2020,36(6):980-984. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3733.2020.06.035.
[34] 吴国锋.面弓记录的临床规范化操作[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志,2017,33(04):567-570.
[35] Ahn SJ, Tsou L, Antonio Sánchez C, et al.Analyzing center of rotation during opening and closing movements of the mandible using computer simulations[J]. J Biomech, 2015,48(4):666-671. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.12.041.
[36] Hagiwara Y, Narita T, Araki M, et al.Repair of a multiple implant-supported fixed superstructure with a metal-ceramic resin-bonded fixed partial denture: a clinical report[J]. J Oral Implantol, 2014,40 Spec No:371-374. DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-12-00036.
[37] 阚娜.全口义齿修复前干预对修复满意度影响的研究[J]. 国际老年医学杂志,2014,35(6): 260-262. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7593.2014.06.007.
[38] 邓华颉, 王芳, 钟晓霞.T-Scan咬合分析系统对全口义齿咬合关系的研究[J]. 广西医科大学学报,2015,32(3):408-409.
[39] Ayuso-Montero R, Mariano-Hernandez Y, Khoury-Ribas L, et al.Reliability and validity of T-scan and 3D intraoral scanning for measuring the occlusal contact Area[J]. J Prosthodont, 2020,29(1):19-25. DOI: 10.1111/jopr.13096.
[40] Luo Q, Ding Q, Zhang L, et al.Analyzing the occlusion variation of single posterior implant-supported fixed prostheses by using the T-scan system: a prospective 3-year follow-up study[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2020,123(1):79-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.12.012.
[41] Madani AS, Nakhaei M, Alami M, et al.Post-insertion posterior single-implant occlusion changes at different intervals: a T-scan computerized occlusal analysis[J]. J Contemp Dent Pract, 2017,18(10):927-932. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2151.
[42] da Silva Marques DN, Marques Pinto RJ, Alves R, et al.Soft tissue replication in single unit implant impressions-A three dimensional clinical study[J]. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2019,31(4):359-368. DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12481.

[1]	Zhou Yanmin, Qin Qiuyue. Clinical implications of 3-dimensional osteogenesis model for maxillary sinus to promote osteogenesis in maxillary sinus [J]. Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2023, 28(2): 69-76.
[2]	Yu Jiuyue, Jia Wenhao, Fang Li, Wang Jian, Li Jiangming, Liu Han, Guo Qili. Clinical analysis of extraction site preservation using Bio-Oss Collagen after extraction of maxillary molars [J]. Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2023, 28(2): 90-96.
[3]	Li Xiaoyu, He Jie, Wang Xueke, Duan Jingyi, Ge Chang, Meng Weiyan. Application of Bio-Oss Collagen with tent pole procedure in vertical bone augmentation of edentulous maxillary posterior area: a case report [J]. Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2023, 28(2): 97-101.
[4]	Luo Guisheng, Liu Yumeng, Wang Penglai, Yuan Changyong. Research progress on trace elements modification of PEEK implant [J]. Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2023, 28(2): 109-113.
[5]	Zhou Yanmin, Zhu Yuemeng. Construction of the 3-dimensional osteogenesis model for maxillary sinus [J]. Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2023, 28(1): 9-18.
[6]	Cheng Wen, Ma Xiaoting, Shen Yajie, Lv Shouyin, Shao Bo. Research progress on nano-silver antibacterial materials in the application in oral implantology [J]. Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2023, 28(1): 40-46.
[7]	Chen Jiang. Application of robots in the field of dental implantology [J]. Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2022, 27(5): 274-279.
[8]	Zhang Qihang, Gong Jiaming, Gou Ping, Yu Jiaying, Bo Lei, Yu Zhanhai. A meta-analysis of interimplant distance on peri-implant bone resorption [J]. Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2022, 27(5): 304-311.
[9]	Teng Weiwei, Su Tianyue, Wang Qi, Shu Qianyi, Zhou Libo, Hou Yuze. Current status of the use of polyurethane artificial bone in vitro studies of dental implants [J]. Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2022, 27(5): 312-316.
[10]	Yang Dezhao, Xu Yingjie, Tang Zhengting, Ma Yuxiao, Li Guangcheng, Meng Fanwen. Application of lag screw technique in alveolar bone block grafting [J]. Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2022, 27(4): 217-223.
[11]	Ma Yuxiao, Zhou Libo, Meng Fanwen, Yang Dezhao, Wang Zhaoyun, Duan Feng. Comparison of implantation accuracy of four implantation methods in the posterior region of mandible: an in vitro study [J]. Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2022, 27(4): 229-237.
[12]	Zhang Ruiyuan, Zhong Weijian, Ma Guowu. Research progress of socket-shield technique in immediate implantation [J]. Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2022, 27(4): 238-242.
[13]	Su Tianyue, Teng Weiwei, Wang Qi, Shu Qianyi, Zhou Libo. Progress in evaluation methods of dental implant placement accuracy [J]. Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2022, 27(4): 248-253.
[14]	Jiang Ruifang, Zhang Yanfang, Li Xue, Liu Liu, Xue Peng. The application of dynamic navigation system in dental implant training [J]. Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2022, 27(4): 254-258.
[15]	Ni Ting, Zhang Liang, Han Zekui, Wang Xinyu, Duan Feng. Digital measurement methods on accuracy evaluation of six implants placed paralleled with the static surgical guide [J]. Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2022, 27(3): 140-146.