自由手、种植外科导板、口腔种植机器人种植精度对比的体外研究

doi:10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2023.08.007

中国口腔种植学杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (4): 244-249.DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2023.08.007

自由手、种植外科导板、口腔种植机器人种植精度对比的体外研究

苏天月, 赵金荣, 滕微微, 刘鹏慧, 李欣茹, 周立波

佳木斯大学附属口腔医院黑龙江省口腔生物医学材料及临床应用重点实验室 154000

收稿日期:2023-06-27 出版日期:2023-08-30 发布日期:2023-09-05
通讯作者: 周立波,Email：zhoulibo0219@gmail.com,电话：0454-8625462
作者简介:苏天月,硕士研究生,研究方向：数字化口腔种植;周立波,副主任医师、硕士研究生导师,研究方向：数字化口腔种植
基金资助:
黑龙江省自然科学基金项目（LH2021H108）; 黑龙江省普通高等学校青年创新人才培养计划项目（UNPYSCT-2020057）; 佳木斯大学青年创新人才培养支持计划项目（JMSUQP2020020）

An in vitro study on the comparison of implant accuracy of freehand, implant surgical guide, and dental implant robot

Su Tianyue, Zhao Jinrong, Teng weiwei, Liu Penghui, Li Xinru, Zhou Libo

Affiliated Stomatological Hospital, Jiamusi University, Heilongjiang Key Lab of Oral Biomedicine Materials and Clinical Application, Jiamusi 154000, Heilongjiang, China

Received:2023-06-27 Online:2023-08-30 Published:2023-09-05
Contact: Zhou Libo, Email: zhoulibo0219@gmail.com, Tel: 0086-454-8625462
Supported by:
Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province (LH2021H108); Heilongjiang Provincial Education Department Young Talent Innovation Program Project (UNPYSCT-2020057); Jiamusi University Youth Innovative Talents Training Support Program (JMSUQP2020020)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的对比口腔种植机器人与自由手、种植外科导板在同一实验条件下的种植精度。方法选用实心刚性聚氨酯作为研究对象。将聚氨酯模型的90个种植位点分为三组,第一组为自由手组（n=30）,由医生自由手种植;第二组为导板组（n=30）,由种植外科导板种植;第三组为机器人组（n=30）,由口腔种植机器人辅助种植。模型接受CBCT扫描后进行种植规划,然后分别由自由手、种植外科导板与口腔种植机器人进行种植,术后再次扫描CBCT。分析和比较种植体实际位置与规划位置间的偏差。结果在此实验中,与自由手组相比,导板组与机器人组的植入点总误差、植入点横向误差、根尖点总误差、根尖点横向误差、角度误差降低（P<0.05）。导板组与机器人组在各方向偏差的差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论通过体外模型实验可以看到与自由手种植相比,口腔种植机器人是一种更可靠、更准确的植入技术。

关键词: 自由手, 种植外科导板, 口腔种植机器人, 口腔种植, 精度

Abstract: Objective To compare the implant accuracy of dental implant robot, freehand, and implant surgical guide under the same experimental conditions. Methods Solid rigid polyurethane was selected as the research medium. The 90 implant sites of the polyurethane model were divided into three groups: the first group is the freehand group (n=30), which is implanted by the doctor's freehand; the second group was the guide group (n=30), and the implant surgical guides were used to assist implant placement; and the third group was the robot group (n=30), which was assisted by dental implant robot while the implants were also placed by the same doctor. CBCT was taken for implant planning, and the implant placements were carried out by freehand, implant surgical guide and dental implant robot, and CBCT was taken again after surgery to analyze and compare the deviation between the actual implant position and the planned position. Results In the polyurethane experiment, compared with the freehand group, the total implant site deviation, the lateral implant site deviation, the total apex deviation, the lateral apex deviation, and the angular deviation in the guide and robot groups were reduced (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the guide group and the robot group in all directions of deviation (P>0.05). Conclusion Through the in vitro model experiment, it can be determined that dental implant robot is a more reliable and accurate implant technology than freehand method.

Key words: Freehand, Implant surgical guide, Dental implant robot, Oral implant, Accuracy

苏天月,赵金荣,滕微微,等. 自由手、种植外科导板、口腔种植机器人种植精度对比的体外研究[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(4): 244-249. DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2023.08.007

Su Tianyue, Zhao Jinrong, Teng weiwei, Liu Penghui, Li Xinru, Zhou Libo. An in vitro study on the comparison of implant accuracy of freehand, implant surgical guide, and dental implant robot[J].Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2023, 28(4): 244-249.DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2023.08.007.

参考文献

[1] Ramasamy M, Giri, Raja R, et al.Implant surgical guides: from the past to the present[J]. J Pharm Bioallied Sci, 2013,5(Suppl 1):S98-S102. DOI: 10.4103/0975-7406.113306.
[2] Block MS, Emery RW.Static or dynamic navigation for implant placement-choosing the method of guidance[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2016,74(2):269-277. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.09.022.
[3] Vercruyssen M, Laleman I, Jacobs R, et al.Computer-supported implant planning and guided surgery: a narrative review[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2015,26(Suppl 11):S69-S76. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12638.
[4] Bolding SL, Reebye UN.Accuracy of haptic robotic guidance of dental implant surgery for completely edentulous arches[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2022,128(4):639-647. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.12.048.
[5] 谢瑞. 口腔种植机器人系统精度的相关研究[D]. 西安:第四军医大学, 2016.
[6] Yang S, Chen J, Li A, et al.Autonomous robotic surgery for immediately loaded implant-supported maxillary full-arch prosthesis: a case report[J]. J Clin Med, 2022,11(21):6594.DOI: 10.3390/jcm11216594.
[7] Comuzzi L, Tumedei M, Pontes AE, et al.Primary stability of dental implants in low-density (10 and 20 pcf) polyurethane foam blocks: conical vs cylindrical implants[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2020,17(8):2617.DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17082617.
[8] Plastics C, Screws B .Standard specification for rigid polyurethane foam for use as a standard material for testing orthopaedic devices and instruments[S].United States: ASTM International, 2008.
[9] Devlin H, Horner K, Ledgerton D.A comparison of maxillary and mandibular bone mineral densities[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 1998,79(3):323-327. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(98)70245-8.
[10] Jung RE, Schneider D, Ganeles J, et al.Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: a systematic review[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2009,24(Suppl):S92-S109.
[11] Taheri Otaghsara SS, Joda T, Thieringer FM.Accuracy of dental implant placement using static versus dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery: an in vitro study[J]. J Dent, 2023,132:104487. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104487.
[12] Kivovics M, Takács A, Pénzes D, et al.Accuracy of dental implant placement using augmented reality-based navigation, static computer assisted implant surgery, and the free-hand method: an in vitro study[J]. J Dent, 2022,119:104070. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104070.
[13] Chen CK, Yuh DY, Huang RY, et al.Accuracy of implant placement with a navigation system, a laboratory guide, and freehand drilling[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2018,33(6):1213-1218. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.6585.
[14] Mozer PS.Accuracy and deviation analysis of static and robotic guided implant surgery: a case study[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2020,35(5):e86-e90. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.8231.
[15] 李艳琴, 陈江. 机器人系统辅助口腔种植手术精度的Meta分析[J].中国口腔种植学杂志,2023,28(3):186-192. DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2023.06.010.
[16] Cheng KJ, Kan TS, Liu YF, et al.Accuracy of dental implant surgery with robotic position feedback and registration algorithm: an in-vitro study[J]. Comput Biol Med, 2021,129:104153. DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.104153.
[17] Kan TS, Cheng KJ, Liu YF, et al.Evaluation of a custom-designed human-robot collaboration control system for dental implant robot[J]. Int J Med Robot, 2022,18(1):e2346. DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2346.
[18] Tao B, Feng Y, Fan X, et al.Accuracy of dental implant surgery using dynamic navigation and robotic systems: an in vitro study[J]. J Dent, 2022,123:104170. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104170.
[19] Bover-Ramos F, Viña-Almunia J, Cervera-Ballester J, et al.Accuracy of implant placement with computer-guided surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing cadaver, clinical, and in vitro studies[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2018,33(1):101-115. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.5556.
[20] Tahmaseb A, Wu V, Wismeijer D, et al.The accuracy of static computer-aided implant surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2018,29(Suppl 16):S416-S435. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13346.
[21] Ruppin J, Popovic A, Strauss M, et al.Evaluation of the accuracy of three different computer-aided surgery systems in dental implantology: optical tracking vs. stereolithographic splint systems[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2008,19(7):709-716. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01430.x.
[22] Block MS, Emery RW, Lank K, et al.Implant placement accuracy using dynamic navigation[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2017,32(1):92-99. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.5004.
[23] Yimarj P, Subbalekha K, Dhanesuan K, et al.Comparison of the accuracy of implant position for two-implants supported fixed dental prosthesis using static and dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery: a randomized controlled clinical trial[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2020,22(6):672-678. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12949.
[24] Schermeier O, Hildebrand D, Lueth TC, et al.Accuracy of an image-guided system for oral implantology[J]. International Congress Series, 2001,1230:748-752. DOI:10.1016/S0531-5131(01)00126-1.
[25] Rungcharassaeng K, Caruso JM, Kan JY, et al.Accuracy of computer-guided surgery: a comparison of operator experience[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2015,114(3):407-413. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.004.
[26] Mora MA, Chenin DL, Arce RM.Software tools and surgical guides in dental-implant-guided surgery[J]. Dent Clin North Am, 2014,58(3):597-626. DOI: 10.1016/j.cden.2014.04.001.
[27] Cassetta M, Di Mambro A, Giansanti M, et al.The intrinsic error of a stereolithographic surgical template in implant guided surgery[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2013,42(2):264-275. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2012.06.010.
[28] 耿威. 数字化外科导板在口腔种植修复中的临床应用[D]. 长春:吉林大学, 2015.
[29] 黄弘, 付钢, 陈曦, 等. 口腔种植机器人在前牙区即刻种植中的精度分析[J].中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(3):172-178. DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz. 2023. 06.008.
[30] 皮雪敏, 陈德平, 任斌, 等. 口腔种植机器人辅助美学区种植即刻修复的临床研究[J].中国口腔种植学杂志,2023, 28(3):179-185. DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz. 2023.06.009.

自由手、种植外科导板、口腔种植机器人种植精度对比的体外研究

An in vitro study on the comparison of implant accuracy of freehand, implant surgical guide, and dental implant robot

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	张思慧, 陈威夷, 蔡琴, 林宇轩, 陈江. 比较全程引导与半程引导机器人技术对无牙颌种植精度的影响[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(4): 229-232.
[2]	王琦, 滕微微, 苏天月, 舒倩怡, 李翠英, 王心彧, 周立波. 口腔种植的体内实验中模拟人颌骨动物模型的选择[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(4): 285-289.
[3]	阿兰, 王林, 孙悦, 徐文洲, 孙晓琳, 马玲, 周延民. 口腔种植专业学位研究生培养的思政融合探索[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(4): 295-297.
[4]	孙雨辰, 耿威, 林潇, 刘静明, 孙玉洁. 基于多学科联合PBL教学模式的口腔种植研究生培养路径方法探索[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(4): 298-301.
[5]	徐淑兰, 李平. 机器人辅助口腔种植体植入术：机遇与挑战[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(3): 140-145.
[6]	谢瑞, 李志文, 任楠, 赵瑞峰, 白石柱. 口腔种植机器人在不同视觉系统下的手术精度研究[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(3): 152-158.
[7]	贺瑾, 任凌飞, 张芩梦, 姜治伟, 杨国利. 分析自主式机器人种植术采用微创不翻瓣技术的临床应用价值[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(3): 159-164.
[8]	姜雨汐, 孙仕晨, 万林子, 刘文锋, 杨志康, 吴熙凤, 孙海鹏, 李树春, 高永波. 口腔种植机器人在即刻种植中的精度研究[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(3): 165-171.
[9]	黄弘, 付钢, 陈曦, 何田. 口腔种植机器人在前牙区即刻种植中的精度分析[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(3): 172-178.
[10]	皮雪敏, 陈德平, 任斌, 潘红, 宿玉成, 刘倩, 汪霞. 口腔种植机器人辅助美学区种植即刻修复的临床研究[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(3): 179-185.
[11]	李艳琴, 陈江. 机器人系统辅助口腔种植手术精度的Meta分析[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(3): 186-192.
[12]	李效宇, 何捷, 王雪珂, 段静旖, 葛畅, 孟维艳. 应用骨胶原结合帐篷技术行上颌后牙连续缺失垂直骨增量一例[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(2): 97-101.
[13]	陈江. 机器人在口腔种植领域的应用[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2022, 27(5): 274-279.
[14]	郭永青, 马允, 于皓. 种植支持式固定义齿被动就位的临床检测方法[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2022, 27(4): 243-247.
[15]	苏天月, 滕微微, 王琦, 舒倩怡, 周立波. 口腔种植体植入精度评估方法的应用进展[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2022, 27(4): 248-253.