口腔种植体植入精度评估方法的应用进展

doi:10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2022.08.009

中国口腔种植学杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (4): 248-253.DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2022.08.009

口腔种植体植入精度评估方法的应用进展

苏天月¹, 滕微微¹, 王琦¹, 舒倩怡², 周立波¹

1 佳木斯大学附属口腔医院黑龙江省口腔生物医学材料及临床应用重点实验室 154000;
2 中国医学科学院北京协和医院 100730

收稿日期:2022-04-09 出版日期:2022-08-30 发布日期:2022-09-07
通讯作者: 周立波,Email：zhoulibo0219@gmail.com,电话：0454-8625462 作者简介：苏天月,硕士研究生在读,研究方向：数字化口腔种植;周立波,副主任医师、硕士研究生导师,研究方向：数字化口腔种植
基金资助:
黑龙江省自然科学基金项目（LH2021H108）; 黑龙江省普通高等学校青年创新人才培养计划项目（UNPYSCT-2020057）; 佳木斯大学青年创新人才培养支持计划项目（JMSUQP2020020）

Progress in evaluation methods of dental implant placement accuracy

Su Tianyue¹, Teng Weiwei¹, Wang Qi¹, Shu Qianyi², Zhou Libo¹

1 Affiliated stomatological hospital,Jiamusi University, Heilongjiang Key Lab of Oral Biomedicine Materials and Clinical Application, Hei Longjiang Jiamusi 154000, China;
2 Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beiing 100730, China

Received:2022-04-09 Online:2022-08-30 Published:2022-09-07
Contact: Zhou Libo, Email: zhoulibo0219@gmail.com, Tel: 0081-454-8625462
Supported by:
Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province（LH2021H108）; University Nursing Provincing for Young Scholars with Creative Talents in Heilongjiang Province （UNPYSCT-2020057）; Jiamusi University Youth Innovative Talents Training Support Program （JMSUQP2020020）

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 静态导板、动态导航与口腔种植机器人等数字化技术在口腔种植领域的应用实现了精准种植的目的,然而口腔种植位点精准记录与评估尚无统一标准,因此选择高精度术后评估方法来准确反映种植体精度变得尤为重要。目前口腔种植体植入术后评估常用的仪器有CBCT、口内扫描仪、台式光学扫描仪、三坐标测量仪等。在其他领域的钻孔实验中,也有使用卡尺、塞规、数字化测量仪器如三坐标测量仪与激光跟踪仪等方法进行测量,这些方法可以为口腔种植体植入精度的评估提供参考。本文将对口腔种植钻孔实验中所涉及的精度评估方法的原理、精度以及特点进行综述,为实验与临床中种植体植入精度评估提供理论参考。

关键词: 精度测量, 锥形束计算机体层成像, 口腔扫描, 三坐标测量仪, 口腔种植

Abstract: The application of digital technologies such as static guide, dynamic navigation and dental implant robot in the field of dental implant achieves the purpose of accurate implant placement. However, there is no unified standard for accurate recording and evaluation of dental implant sites, it is particularly important to select high-resolution postoperative evaluation methods to accurately reflect the accuracy of dental implants. At present, the commonly used instruments for assessment after dental implant surgery include CBCT, intraoral scanner, desktop optical scanner, and three-coordinate measuring instrument. In drilling experiments in other fields, calipers, plug gauges, digital measuring instruments such as three-coordinate measuring machine and laser tracker are also used for measurement, which can provide reference for the evaluation of the accuracy of dental implant implantation. In this paper, the principles, precision and characteristics of the accuracy evaluation methods involved in the drilling experiments of dental implants are reviewed, in order to provide a theoretical reference for the accuracy evaluation of dental implants in experiments and clinical practice.

Key words: Accuracy evaluation, Cone beam computed tomography, Oral scanner, Coordinate measuring machine, Dental implant

苏天月,滕微微,王琦,等. 口腔种植体植入精度评估方法的应用进展[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2022, 27(4): 248-253. DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2022.08.009

Su Tianyue, Teng Weiwei, Wang Qi, Shu Qianyi, Zhou Libo. Progress in evaluation methods of dental implant placement accuracy[J].Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2022, 27(4): 248-253.DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2022.08.009.

参考文献

[1] Stoetzer M, Wagner ME, Wenzel D, et al.Nonradiological method for 3-dimensional implant position assessment using an intraoral scan: new method for postoperative implant control[J]. Implant Dent, 2014,23(5):612-616. DOI: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000118.
[2] Revilla-León M, Gonzalez-Martín Ó, Pérez López J, et al.Position accuracy of implant analogs on 3D printed polymer versus conventional dental stone casts measured using a coordinate measuring machine[J]. J Prosthodont, 2018,27(6):560-567. DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12708.
[3] Mizumoto RM, Yilmaz B, McGlumphy EA Jr, et al. Accuracy of different digital scanning techniques and scan bodies for complete-arch implant-supported prostheses[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2020,123(1):96-104. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.01.003.
[4] Revilla-León M, Att W, Özcan M, et al.Comparison of conventional, photogrammetry, and intraoral scanning accuracy of complete-arch implant impression procedures evaluated with a coordinate measuring machine[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2021,125(3):470-478. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.03.005.
[5] Tallarico M, Xhanari E, Kim YJ, et al.Accuracy of computer-assisted template-based implant placement using conventional impression and scan model or intraoral digital impression: a randomised controlled trial with 1 year of follow-up[J]. Int J Oral Implantol (Berl), 2019,12(2):197-206.
[6] Ellakany P, Tantawi ME, Mahrous AA, et al.Evaluation of the accuracy of digital impressions obtained from intraoral and extraoral dental scanners with different CAD/CAM scanning technologies: an in vitro study[J]. J Prosthodont, 2022,31(4):314-319. DOI: 10.1111/jopr.13400.
[7] 李旻. 口腔锥形束CT对下颌牙种植位点线性测量精度的实验研究[D]. 安徽医科大学, 2016.
[8] Lagravère MO, Carey J, Toogood RW, et al.Three-dimensional accuracy of measurements made with software on cone-beam computed tomography images[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2008,134(1):112-116. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.08.024.
[9] Jacobs R, Salmon B, Codari M, et al.Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: recommendations for clinical use[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2018,18(1):88. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-018-0523-5.
[10] Al-Rimawi A, Shaheen E, Albdour EA, et al.Trueness of cone beam computed tomography versus intra-oral scanner derived three-dimensional digital models: an ex vivo study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2019,30(6):498-504. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13434.
[11] Harris D, Horner K, Gröndahl K, et al.E.A.O. guidelines for the use of diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry 2011. A consensus workshop organized by the european association for osseointegration at the medical university of warsaw[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2012,23(11):1243-1253. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02441.x.
[12] Brandt J, Brenner M, Lauer HC, et al.Accuracy of a template-guided implant surgery system with a cad/cam-based measurement method: an in vitro study[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2018,33(2):328-334. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.5799.
[13] Pan Y, Heng C, Wu ZJ, et al.Comparison of the virtual techniques in registering single implant position with a universal-coordinate system: an in vitro study[J]. J Dent, 2022,117:103925. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103925.
[14] Benic GI, Elmasry M, Hämmerle CH. Novel digital imaging techniques to assess the outcome in oral rehabilitation with dental implants: a narrative review[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2015,26 Suppl 11:86-96. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12616.
[15] Marotti J, Neuhaus S, Habor D, et al.High-frequency ultrasound for assessment of peri-implant bone thickness[J]. J Clin Med, 2019,8(10):1539. DOI: 10.3390/jcm8101539.
[16] Ye N, Jian F, Xue J, et al.Accuracy of in-vitro tooth volumetric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2012,142(6):879-887. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.05.020.
[17] Nickenig HJ, Eitner S.Reliability of implant placement after virtual planning of implant positions using cone beam CT data and surgical (guide) templates[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2007,35(4-5):207-211. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2007.02.004.
[18] Al-Ekrish AA, Ekram M.A comparative study of the accuracy and reliability of multidetector computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography in the assessment of dental implant site dimensions[J]. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 2011,40(2):67-75. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/27546065.
[19] Wismeijer D, Joda T, Flügge T, et al. Group 5 ITI consensus report: digital technologies[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2018,29 Suppl 16:436-442. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13309.
[20] 王勇. 口内数字印模技术[J].口腔医学, 2015,35(9):705-709, 743.DOI:10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2015.09.001.
[21] Liu X, Liu J, Feng H, et al.Accuracy of a milled digital implant surgical guide: an in vitro study[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2022,127(3):453-461. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.07.041.
[22] Diker B, Tak Ö.Comparing the accuracy of six intraoral scanners on prepared teeth and effect of scanning sequence[J]. J Adv Prosthodont, 2020,12(5):299-306. DOI: 10.4047/jap.2020.12.5.299.
[23] Koretsi V, Tingelhoff L, Proff P, et al.Intra-observer reliability and agreement of manual and digital orthodontic model analysis[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2018,40(1):52-57. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjx040.
[24] Emir F, Ayyıldız S.Evaluation of the trueness and precision of eight extraoral laboratory scanners with a complete-arch model: a three-dimensional analysis[J]. J Prosthodont Res, 2019,63(4):434-439. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpor.2019.03.001.
[25] Bilmenoglu C, Cilingir A, Geckili O, et al.In vitro comparison of trueness of 10 intraoral scanners for implant-supported complete-arch fixed dental prostheses[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2020,124(6):755-760. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.11.017.
[26] Kniha K, Brandt M, Bock A, et al.Accuracy of fully guided orthodontic mini-implant placement evaluated by cone-beam computed tomography: a study involving human cadaver heads[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2021,25(3):1299-1306. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-020-03436-9.
[27] Huang R, Liu Y, Huang B, et al.Improved scanning accuracy with newly designed scan bodies: an in vitro study comparing digital versus conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2020,31(7):625-633. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13598.
[28] Knechtle N, Wiedemeier D, Mehl A, et al.Accuracy of digital complete-arch, multi-implant scans made in the edentulous jaw with gingival movement simulation: an in vitro study[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.12.037.
[29] Kernen F, Benic GI, Payer M, et al.Accuracy of three-dimensional printed templates for guided implant placement based on matching a surface scan with CBCT[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2016,18(4):762-768. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12348.
[30] Bohner L, De Luca Canto G, Marció BS, et al. Computer-aided analysis of digital dental impressions obtained from intraoral and extraoral scanners[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2017,118(5):617-623. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.11.018.
[31] Zhou M, Zhou H, Li SY, et al.Dental implant location via surface scanner: a pilot study[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2020,20(1):306. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-020-01297-y.
[32] Gimenez-Gonzalez B, Hassan B, Özcan M, et al.An in vitro study of factors influencing the performance of digital intraoral impressions operating on active wavefront sampling technology with multiple implants in the edentulous maxilla[J]. J Prosthodont, 2017,26(8):650-655. DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12457.
[33] Abduo J, Elseyoufi M.Accuracy of intraoral scanners: a systematic review of influencing factors[J]. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent, 2018,26(3):101-121. DOI: 10.1922/EJPRD_01752Abduo21.
[34] Rutkunas V, Geciauskaite A, Jegelevicius D, et al. Accuracy of digital implant impressions with intraoral scanners. A systematic review[J]. Eur J Oral Implantol, 2017,10 Suppl 1:101-120.
[35] 周朝政. 颅颌面整形外科手术机器人关键技术研究[D]. 上海交通大学, 2017.
[36] Walter YHL, Henry YTN, Peter YPW, et al.Image calibration and registration in cone-beam computed tomogram for measuring the accuracy of computer-aided implant surgery[J]. Electronic Imaging, 2015, 9405: 94050A.
[37] Yen CY, Kuo PJ, Lin CY, et al.Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography in measuring thicknesses of hard-tissue-mimicking material adjacent to different implant thread surfaces[J]. J Dent Sci, 2019,14(2):119-125. DOI: 10.1016/j.jds.2019.04.001.
[38] 赵瑞强. CFRP制孔末端执行器设计及孔位识别算法研究[D]. 哈尔滨理工大学, 2021.
[39] 崔萌. 智能人机协同开颅手术机器人系统辅助开颅手术实验验证研究[D].中国人民解放军医学院,2019.DOI:10.27637/d.cnki.gjyjc.2019.000259.

口腔种植体植入精度评估方法的应用进展

Progress in evaluation methods of dental implant placement accuracy

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	李效宇, 何捷, 王雪珂, 段静旖, 葛畅, 孟维艳. 应用骨胶原结合帐篷技术行上颌后牙连续缺失垂直骨增量一例[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(2): 97-101.
[2]	陈江. 机器人在口腔种植领域的应用[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2022, 27(5): 274-279.
[3]	郭永青, 马允, 于皓. 种植支持式固定义齿被动就位的临床检测方法[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2022, 27(4): 243-247.
[4]	蒋瑞芳, 张艳芳, 李雪, 刘浏, 薛芃. 动态导航技术在口腔种植教学中的应用研究[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2022, 27(4): 254-258.
[5]	陈德平, 刘倩, 皮雪敏, 潘红, 谭包生, 宿玉成. 上颌窦血供及黏骨膜的应用解剖和CBCT评估[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2022, 27(4): 259-263.
[6]	倪婷, 张亮, 韩泽奎, 王心彧, 段峰. 数字化导板辅助种植6颗平行种植体精确度分析[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2022, 27(3): 140-146.
[7]	付丽, 徐彦雪, 王林. 口腔种植学“课程思政”教学的初步探索[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2022, 27(3): 188-192.
[8]	陈德平, 皮雪敏, 刘倩, 潘红, 谭包生, 宿玉成. 上颌窦底提升相关的应用解剖和放射线诊断[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2022, 27(3): 193-198.
[9]	罗少康, 李树春. 侧壁开窗上颌窦底提升的术中并发症研究进展[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2022, 27(2): 119-123.
[10]	蓝耕良, 陶宝鑫, 黄伟, 王凤, 李顺顺, 吴轶群. 动态导航引导颧种植体植入的临床工作流程[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2022, 27(1): 9-15.
[11]	齐俊男, 付丽. 巨噬细胞在骨修复及生物材料整合中的作用[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2022, 27(1): 54-57.
[12]	甄子澄, 燕寒, 朱红梅, 张燕. 口腔种植修复专科电子病历系统的开发和应用[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2021, 26(6): 391-395.
[13]	赵瑜越, 黄雁红, 黄英, 陈潇, 容明灯, 张雪洋. 无牙颌种植修复中的牙合学要素[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2021, 26(6): 400-404.
[14]	中华口腔医学会口腔种植专业委员会. “中华口腔医学会口腔种植专业委员会第十二次全国口腔种植学术大会”会议简报[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2021, 26(4): 264-274.
[15]	韩欣欣, 李雅瑾, 刘晓强. 口腔种植个性化软组织印模的改良方法与应用评价[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2021, 26(3): 159-163.