取骨方式对自体骨活性及在引导骨再生术中成骨效应的影响

doi:10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2022.02.012

中国口腔种植学杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (1): 58-63.DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2022.02.012

• 综述 • 上一篇

取骨方式对自体骨活性及在引导骨再生术中成骨效应的影响

干嘉雯¹, 窦嘉琪¹, 徐陈词¹, 吴轶群^1,2, 王凤^1,3

¹上海交通大学口腔医学院 200001;
²上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院·口腔医学院口腔第二门诊部上海交通大学口腔医学院国家口腔医学中心国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心上海市口腔医学重点实验室 200001;
³上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院·口腔医学院口腔种植科上海交通大学口腔医学院国家口腔医学中心国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心上海市口腔医学重点实验室 200001;

收稿日期:2021-12-14 发布日期:2022-03-09
通讯作者: 吴轶群,Email: yiqunwu@hotmail.com,电话：021-56152705;王凤,Email: diana_wangfeng@aliyun.com ,电话：021-53315299

Impact of bone harvesting methods on cell viability of autogenous bone particles in guided bone regeneration

Gan Jiawen¹, Dou Jiaqi¹, Xu Chenci¹, Wu Yiqun^1,2, Wang Feng^1,3

¹College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200001, China;
²Department of Second Dental Center, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology & Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai 200001, China;
³Department of Oral Implantology, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200001, China

Received:2021-12-14 Published:2022-03-09
Contact: Wu Yiqun, Email: yiqunwu@hotmail.com, Tel: 0086-21-56152705; Wang Feng, Email: diana_wangfeng@aliyun.com, Tel: 0086-21-53315299

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 临床牙槽骨缺损可以采用各类骨增量材料进行修复重建,但对于骨缺损大的区域,获取和加入一定比例的自体骨是获得良好成骨预后的一个重要环节。临床制取自体骨屑的方法有很多种,包括通过手持器械如骨凿、刮骨器取骨,采用机用旋转器械如取骨环钻、超声骨刀、骨吸引收集器等。文章总结了不同取骨方法所获得自体骨的活性及成骨效能,希望为临床引导骨再生取骨时使用工具的选择提供参考,以获得最佳骨诱导效果,提高骨重建的质量。

关键词: 引导骨再生, 自体骨, 细胞活性, 取骨技术

Abstract: A variety of bone substitute materials can be used to repair and reconstruct clinical alveolar bone defects, but in the site with great bony volume insufficiency, it is very important to harvest and add a certain proportion of autogenous bone particles to achieve better clinical outcomes. The approaches to gain autografts include handheld instruments such as chisels and scrapers, rotating instruments such as trephines, piezoelectric instruments, and bone filters. It remains unclear which harvesting methods can provide autografts with the greatest osteoinductive and osteogenic potential in clinical bone augmentation. This review mainly summarized surgical results of different scholars using different methods of bone extraction from different sources of autologous bone, hoping to provide a reference for the selection of tools for bone extraction during clinical guidance of bone regeneration, to obtain the best bone induction effect and improve the quality of bone reconstruction.

Key words: Guided bone regeneration, Autogenous bone grafts, Cell viability, Bone harvesting techniques

干嘉雯,窦嘉琪,徐陈词,等. 取骨方式对自体骨活性及在引导骨再生术中成骨效应的影响[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2022, 27(1): 58-63. DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2022.02.012

Gan Jiawen, Dou Jiaqi, Xu Chenci, Wu Yiqun, Wang Feng. Impact of bone harvesting methods on cell viability of autogenous bone particles in guided bone regeneration[J].Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2022, 27(1): 58-63.DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2022.02.012.

参考文献

[1] Jake N, Seibert FJ, Lorenzoni M, et al.A modified technique of harvesting tibial cancellous bone and its use for sinus grafting[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2001,12(5):488-494. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120509.x.
[2] Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M, Rimondini L.Autogenous onlay bone grafts vs. alveolar distraction osteogenesis for the correction of vertically deficient edentulous ridges: a 2-4-year prospective study on humans[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2007,18(4):432-440. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01351.x.
[3] Sakkas A, Wilde F, Heufelder M, et al.Autogenous bone grafts in oral implantology-is it still a "gold standard"? A consecutive review of 279 patients with 456 clinical procedures[J]. Int J Implant Dent, 2017,3(1):23. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-017-0084-4.
[4] Miron RJ, Hedbom E, Saulacic N, et al.Osteogenic potential of autogenous bone grafts harvested with four different surgical techniques[J]. J Dent Res, 2011,90(12):1428-1433. DOI: 10.1177/0022034511422718.
[5] Hassan KS, Kassim A, Al Ogaly AU.A comparative evaluation of immediate dental implant with autogenous versus synthetic guided bone regeneration[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2008,106(5):e8-e15. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.07.015.
[6] Kuchler U, Schmid C, Buser D, et al.The shape of a bone scraper: an in vitro pilot study using porcine bone chips[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2014,43(7):879-882. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2013.11.014.
[7] Aghaloo TL, Moy PK.Which hard tissue augmentation techniques are the most successful in furnishing bony support for implant placement?[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2007,22(Suppl):49-70.
[8] Liang C, Lin X, Wang SL, et al.Osteogenic potential of three different autogenous bone particles harvested during implant surgery[J]. Oral Dis, 2017,23(8):1099-1108. DOI: 10.1111/odi.12704.
[9] Anitua E, Carda C, Andia I.A novel drilling procedure and subsequent bone autograft preparation: a technical note[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2007,22(1):138-145.
[10] Oh JH, Fang Y, Jeong SM, et al.The effect of low-speed drilling without irrigation on heat generation: an experimental study[J]. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2016,42(1):9-12. DOI: 10.5125/jkaoms.2016.42.1.9.
[11] Manzano-Moreno FJ, Herrera-Briones FJ, Linares-Recatala M, et al.Bacterial contamination levels of autogenous bone particles collected by 3 different techniques for harvesting intraoral bone grafts[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2015,73(3):424-429. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.10.020.
[12] Chen CH, Coyac BR, Arioka M, et al.A novel osteotomy preparation technique to preserve implant site viability and enhance osteogenesis[J]. J Clin Med, 2019,8:170.DOI: 10.3390/jcm8020170.
[13] Lim HC, Ha KI, Hong JY, et al.Comparison of the bone harvesting capacity of an intraoral bone harvesting device and three different implant drills[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2017,2017:7819080. DOI: 10.1155/2017/7819080.
[14] Tabassum A, Wismeijer D, Hogervorst J, et al.Comparison of proliferation and differentiation of human osteoblast-like cells harvested during implant osteotomy preparation using two different drilling protocols[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2020,35(1):141-149. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.7648.
[15] Pellicer-Chover H, Peñarrocha-Oltra D, Aloy-Prosper A, et al.Comparison of peri-implant bone loss between conventional drilling with irrigation versus low-speed drilling without irrigation[J]. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 2017,22(6):e730-e736. DOI: 10.4317/medoral.21694.
[16] Buser D.20 years of guided bone regeneration in implant dentistry [M]. UK: Quintessence Publishing, 2009.
[17] Graziani F, Cei S, Ivanovski S, et al.A systematic review of the effectiveness of bone collectors[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2007,22(5):729-735.
[18] Cicciù M, Stacchi C, Fiorillo L, et al.Piezoelectric bone surgery for impacted lower third molar extraction compared with conventional rotary instruments: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2021,50(1):121-131. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2020.03.008.
[19] Valente NA, Cosma L, Nocca G, et al.Piezoelectric device versus conventional osteotomy instruments in the comparison of three different bone harvesting methods: an istomorphometric, phonometric, and chronometric evaluation[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2019,34(5):1070-1077. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.7309.
[20] Rullo R, Piccirillo A, Femiano F, et al.A comparison between piezoelectric devices and conventional rotary instruments in bone harvesting in patients with lip and palate cleft: a petrospective study with clinical, radiographical, and histological evaluation[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2018,2018:2059464. DOI: 10.1155/2018/2059464.
[21] Maglione M, Bevilacqua L, Dotto F, et al.Observational study on the preparation of the implant site with piezosurgery vs. drill: comparison between the two methods in terms of postoperative pain, surgical times, and operational advantages[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2019,2019:8483658. DOI: 10.1155/2019/8483658.
[22] Al-Moraissi EA, Elmansi YA, Al-Sharaee YA, et al.Does the piezoelectric surgical technique produce fewer postoperative sequelae after lower third molar surgery than conventional rotary instruments? a systematic review and meta analysis[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2016,45(3):383-391. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.10.005.
[23] Majewski P.Piezoelectric surgery in autogenous bone block grafts[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2014,34(3):355-363. DOI: 10.11607/prd.1279.
[24] Takamoto M, Takechi M, Ohta K, et al.Risk of bacterial contamination of bone harvesting devices used for autogenous bone graft in implant surgery[J]. Head Face Med, 2013,9:3. DOI: 10.1186/1746-160X-9-3.
[25] Blay A, Tunchel S, Sendyk WR.Viability of autogenous bone grafts obtained by using bone collectors: histological and microbiological study[J]. Pesqui Odontol Bras, 2003,17(3):234-240. DOI: 10.1590/s1517-74912003000300007.
[26] Manzano-Moreno FJ, Rodríguez-Martínez JB, Ramos-Torrecillas J, et al.Proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of osteoblast-like cells obtained from two techniques for harvesting intraoral bone grafts[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2013,17(5):1349-1356. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-012-0811-4.
[27] Mouraret S, Houschyar KS, Hunter DJ, et al.Cell viability after osteotomy and bone harvesting: comparison of piezoelectric surgery and conventional bur[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2014,43(8):966-971. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2013.11.018.
[28] Moradi Haghgoo J, Arabi SR, Hosseinipanah SM, et al.Comparison of the effect of three autogenous bone harvesting methods on cell viability in rabbits[J]. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects, 2017,11(2):73-77. DOI: 10.15171/joddd.2017.014.
[29] Stelzle F, Frenkel C, Riemann M, et al.The effect of load on heat production, thermal effects and expenditure of time during implant site preparation - an experimental ex vivo comparison between piezosurgery and conventional drilling[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2014,25(2):e140-148. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12077.

取骨方式对自体骨活性及在引导骨再生术中成骨效应的影响

Impact of bone harvesting methods on cell viability of autogenous bone particles in guided bone regeneration

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 13

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	李效宇, 何捷, 王雪珂, 段静旖, 葛畅, 孟维艳. 应用骨胶原结合帐篷技术行上颌后牙连续缺失垂直骨增量一例[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(2): 97-101.
[2]	徐亦凡, 叶颖. 美学区牙槽骨解剖特征对引导骨再生效果的影响[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(1): 47-52.
[3]	邓磊, 黄海涛. 上颌窦底提升术后窦腔内成骨机制的研究进展[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(1): 53-57.
[4]	季平. 3D打印个性化钛网用于复杂骨缺损增量治疗的研究进展[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2022, 27(6): 334-339.
[5]	舒倩怡, 宿玉成. 口腔胶原膜生产工艺的研究进展[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2022, 27(6): 358-364.
[6]	中华口腔医学会口腔种植专业委员会. 上颌窦底提升中骨增量材料的专家共识：自体骨[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2022, 27(5): 269-273.
[7]	王婷婷, 王凤, 吴轶群. 3D打印数字化个性化钛网在牙槽嵴引导骨再生中的临床应用[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2022, 27(4): 208-216.
[8]	张立强, 刘洋, 姜昕, 王志会, 许淑泽, 刘倩. 增材制造个性化骨增量钛网的工程实现[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2021, 26(6): 354-361.
[9]	郭雪琪, 陈韵欣, 杨岚, 陈希立, 陈中仁, 苏汉福, 王丽萍. 3D打印个性化钛网修复严重牙槽骨缺损的短期效果观察[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2021, 26(6): 368-375.
[10]	戴俊峰, 于清. 磨牙区种植同期牙槽嵴顶引导骨再生的临床研究[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2021, 26(2): 91-95.
[11]	尉华杰, 邱立新. 块状及片状自体骨重建牙槽嵴重度骨缺损的临床研究[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2021, 26(1): 18-24.
[12]	罗娟, 廖娟, 费伟. CBCT 评估Bio-Gide 胶原膜在上颌窦外提升同期种植术中的临床应用[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2019, 24(4): 166-170.
[13]	梁杰, 周倜, 崔军, 许胜, 徐欣. 壳聚糖基温敏凝胶膜体内引导骨再生性能研究[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2019, 24(1): 1-4.