中国口腔种植学杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (2): 69-71.DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2020.06.005

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

美学区数字化种植导板的临床使用精度研究

陈素凤, 林艺娜, 林海, 陈赟   

  1. 361001 福建厦门 厦门医学院附属口腔医院,厦门市口腔疾病诊疗重点实验室(陈素凤,林海,陈赟);
    361009 福建厦门 厦门市中医院(林艺娜)
  • 出版日期:2020-06-10 发布日期:2021-08-17

Study on the accuracy of the digital implant guides in the aesthetic area

CHEN Sufeng, LIN Yina, LIN Hai, et al   

  1. Stomatological Hospital of Xiamen Medical College, Xiamen 361008, Fujian Province, China. Xiamen Key Laboratory of Stomatological Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Online:2020-06-10 Published:2021-08-17

摘要: 目的: 探讨通用型种植导板对美学区种植手术精度及临床效果的影响。方法: 在通用型种植导板(Segma Guide)的辅助下行种植手术,通过exocad软件测量术前设计种植体位置和术后实际种植体位置偏移值和偏移角度,评价修复后的临床效果。结果: (1)种植体颈部和根部偏移平均值控制在1mm以内,种植体颈部和根部偏移角度小于5°。(2)临床效果较好,种植体角度和龈缘位置与设计时基本一致。结论: 通用型种植导板精度高,偏移角度小,临床效果满意。

关键词: 导板, 种植修复, 数字化

Abstract: Objective: To explore the influence of a universal implant guide on the accuracy and clinical effect of implant surgery in the aesthetic area. Methods: With computer-guided surgery the position of the planned implants was compared to the actual position of the implants. The preoperative computed tomography data was matched with the postoperative computed tomography data by using exocad software. A analysis was used to evaluate the effect on the implant accuracy and angle. The clinical effect was evaluated 2 weeks after repair. Results: (1) The accuracy of the implant neck and root was controlled within 1mm and the average angular deviation of the implant neck and root was less then 5°. (2) The clinical results was good. The implant angle and gingival margin position were basically the same as the design. Conclusion: The universal implant guide has high accuracy, small devitation angle, and satisfactory clinical results.

Key words: guide plate, implant restoration, digital

中图分类号: