中国口腔种植学杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (3): 169-173.DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2021.06.005

• 论著·临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

影响数字化导板精准的临床分析

刘珊, 郭平川, 周国静   

  1. 天津市河西区欣爱齿口腔门诊部 300203
  • 收稿日期:2020-10-30 出版日期:2021-06-10 发布日期:2021-07-14
  • 通讯作者: 郭平川,Email:182334679@qq.com 电话:022-23285556
  • 作者简介:刘珊, 主治医师、硕士,研究方向:牙周病病因学、牙周病与全身关系及牙周病治疗,数字化技术在口腔种植诊疗中的应用;郭平川, 副主任医师、院长,研究方向:无牙颌患者口腔种植修复治疗、即刻种植修复相关治疗

Clinical analysis of the accuracy of digital guide

Liu Shan, Guo Pingchuan, Zhou Guojing   

  1. Tianjin Hexi Xinaichi Stomatological Clinic,TianJin 300203,China
  • Received:2020-10-30 Online:2021-06-10 Published:2021-07-14
  • Contact: Guo Pingchuan, Email: 182334679@qq.com, Tel: 0086-22-23285556

摘要: 目的 评价种植手术期间数字化导板运用的准确性,并讨论其在口腔种植领域所具备的临床推广价值。方法 选择了从2017年1月至2019年1月在欣爱齿口腔门诊部接受治疗的20例牙齿缺失患者。术前进行拍摄CBCT,CAD/CAM导板制备,并根据导板的指示放置65颗种植体。手术操作完成后即刻进行CBCT检查。经由特征点测定的方式,测定术前术后种植体颈部、顶端及整体偏离度的差异。使用SPSS 21.0软件进行分析。结果 实际植入物位置以及设计位置之间的颈部偏差最高是2.78 mm,最低是0.12 mm,平均是(1.45±0.81)mm;顶部的偏差最高是2.96 mm,最低是0.51 mm。平均是(1.62±0.90)mm,最大角度偏差情况是7.14°,最小值为0.16°,平均值为(3.27±2.47)°,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。经比较分析得出下颌种植组导板引导下种植体颈部线性偏差量显著低于上颌种植组(P<0.05)。结论 数字化导板的运用具有更好的准确度,下颌无牙颌数字化导板下的植入精度优于上颌。

关键词: 口腔种植, 数字化种植导板, 精度

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the accuracy of the digital guide during implant surgery and discuss the clinical promotion value in the field oral implantology. Methods Twenty patients diagnosed with dentition defect were selected in Tianjin Xinaichi Dental Clinic from January 2017 to January 2019. Before surgery, CBCT was taken, CAD/CAM guide plate was prepared, and 65 implants were placed according to the instructions of the guide plate. CBCT examination will be performed immediately after the operation is completed. Through the method of characteristic point measurement, the difference of the implant shoulder, the implant apex and the overall deviation before and after the operation was measured. Use SPSS 21.0 software for analysis. Results The maximum deviation of the implant shoulder between the actual implant position and the designed position was 2.78mm, the minimum was 0.12mm, and the average deviation was (1.45±0.81)mm. The maximum deviation of the implant apex was 2.96mm, the minimum deviation was 0.51mm, and the average deviation was (1.62±0.90)mm. The maximum deviation of implant angle was 7.14°, the minimum deviation was 0.16°, and the average deviation was (3.27±2.47)°. There difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). The comparative analysis showed that the linear deviation of the implant shoulder guided by the template in the mandibular implant group was significantly lower than that in the maxillary implant group (P<0.05). Conclusions The digital guide has good accuracy, and the accuracy of guided implant surgery in the mandible is higher than that of the upper jaw.

Key words: Dental implant, Digital implant surgical guide, Accuracy