Progress in evaluation methods of dental implant placement accuracy

doi:10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2022.08.009

Abstract

Abstract: The application of digital technologies such as static guide, dynamic navigation and dental implant robot in the field of dental implant achieves the purpose of accurate implant placement. However, there is no unified standard for accurate recording and evaluation of dental implant sites, it is particularly important to select high-resolution postoperative evaluation methods to accurately reflect the accuracy of dental implants. At present, the commonly used instruments for assessment after dental implant surgery include CBCT, intraoral scanner, desktop optical scanner, and three-coordinate measuring instrument. In drilling experiments in other fields, calipers, plug gauges, digital measuring instruments such as three-coordinate measuring machine and laser tracker are also used for measurement, which can provide reference for the evaluation of the accuracy of dental implant implantation. In this paper, the principles, precision and characteristics of the accuracy evaluation methods involved in the drilling experiments of dental implants are reviewed, in order to provide a theoretical reference for the accuracy evaluation of dental implants in experiments and clinical practice.

Key words: Accuracy evaluation, Cone beam computed tomography, Oral scanner, Coordinate measuring machine, Dental implant

Su Tianyue, Teng Weiwei, Wang Qi, Shu Qianyi, Zhou Libo. Progress in evaluation methods of dental implant placement accuracy[J]. Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2022, 27(4): 248-253.

References

[1] Stoetzer M, Wagner ME, Wenzel D, et al.Nonradiological method for 3-dimensional implant position assessment using an intraoral scan: new method for postoperative implant control[J]. Implant Dent, 2014,23(5):612-616. DOI: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000118.
[2] Revilla-León M, Gonzalez-Martín Ó, Pérez López J, et al.Position accuracy of implant analogs on 3D printed polymer versus conventional dental stone casts measured using a coordinate measuring machine[J]. J Prosthodont, 2018,27(6):560-567. DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12708.
[3] Mizumoto RM, Yilmaz B, McGlumphy EA Jr, et al. Accuracy of different digital scanning techniques and scan bodies for complete-arch implant-supported prostheses[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2020,123(1):96-104. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.01.003.
[4] Revilla-León M, Att W, Özcan M, et al.Comparison of conventional, photogrammetry, and intraoral scanning accuracy of complete-arch implant impression procedures evaluated with a coordinate measuring machine[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2021,125(3):470-478. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.03.005.
[5] Tallarico M, Xhanari E, Kim YJ, et al.Accuracy of computer-assisted template-based implant placement using conventional impression and scan model or intraoral digital impression: a randomised controlled trial with 1 year of follow-up[J]. Int J Oral Implantol (Berl), 2019,12(2):197-206.
[6] Ellakany P, Tantawi ME, Mahrous AA, et al.Evaluation of the accuracy of digital impressions obtained from intraoral and extraoral dental scanners with different CAD/CAM scanning technologies: an in vitro study[J]. J Prosthodont, 2022,31(4):314-319. DOI: 10.1111/jopr.13400.
[7] 李旻. 口腔锥形束CT对下颌牙种植位点线性测量精度的实验研究[D]. 安徽医科大学, 2016.
[8] Lagravère MO, Carey J, Toogood RW, et al.Three-dimensional accuracy of measurements made with software on cone-beam computed tomography images[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2008,134(1):112-116. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.08.024.
[9] Jacobs R, Salmon B, Codari M, et al.Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: recommendations for clinical use[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2018,18(1):88. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-018-0523-5.
[10] Al-Rimawi A, Shaheen E, Albdour EA, et al.Trueness of cone beam computed tomography versus intra-oral scanner derived three-dimensional digital models: an ex vivo study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2019,30(6):498-504. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13434.
[11] Harris D, Horner K, Gröndahl K, et al.E.A.O. guidelines for the use of diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry 2011. A consensus workshop organized by the european association for osseointegration at the medical university of warsaw[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2012,23(11):1243-1253. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02441.x.
[12] Brandt J, Brenner M, Lauer HC, et al.Accuracy of a template-guided implant surgery system with a cad/cam-based measurement method: an in vitro study[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2018,33(2):328-334. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.5799.
[13] Pan Y, Heng C, Wu ZJ, et al.Comparison of the virtual techniques in registering single implant position with a universal-coordinate system: an in vitro study[J]. J Dent, 2022,117:103925. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103925.
[14] Benic GI, Elmasry M, Hämmerle CH. Novel digital imaging techniques to assess the outcome in oral rehabilitation with dental implants: a narrative review[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2015,26 Suppl 11:86-96. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12616.
[15] Marotti J, Neuhaus S, Habor D, et al.High-frequency ultrasound for assessment of peri-implant bone thickness[J]. J Clin Med, 2019,8(10):1539. DOI: 10.3390/jcm8101539.
[16] Ye N, Jian F, Xue J, et al.Accuracy of in-vitro tooth volumetric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2012,142(6):879-887. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.05.020.
[17] Nickenig HJ, Eitner S.Reliability of implant placement after virtual planning of implant positions using cone beam CT data and surgical (guide) templates[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2007,35(4-5):207-211. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2007.02.004.
[18] Al-Ekrish AA, Ekram M.A comparative study of the accuracy and reliability of multidetector computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography in the assessment of dental implant site dimensions[J]. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 2011,40(2):67-75. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/27546065.
[19] Wismeijer D, Joda T, Flügge T, et al. Group 5 ITI consensus report: digital technologies[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2018,29 Suppl 16:436-442. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13309.
[20] 王勇. 口内数字印模技术[J].口腔医学, 2015,35(9):705-709, 743.DOI:10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2015.09.001.
[21] Liu X, Liu J, Feng H, et al.Accuracy of a milled digital implant surgical guide: an in vitro study[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2022,127(3):453-461. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.07.041.
[22] Diker B, Tak Ö.Comparing the accuracy of six intraoral scanners on prepared teeth and effect of scanning sequence[J]. J Adv Prosthodont, 2020,12(5):299-306. DOI: 10.4047/jap.2020.12.5.299.
[23] Koretsi V, Tingelhoff L, Proff P, et al.Intra-observer reliability and agreement of manual and digital orthodontic model analysis[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2018,40(1):52-57. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjx040.
[24] Emir F, Ayyıldız S.Evaluation of the trueness and precision of eight extraoral laboratory scanners with a complete-arch model: a three-dimensional analysis[J]. J Prosthodont Res, 2019,63(4):434-439. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpor.2019.03.001.
[25] Bilmenoglu C, Cilingir A, Geckili O, et al.In vitro comparison of trueness of 10 intraoral scanners for implant-supported complete-arch fixed dental prostheses[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2020,124(6):755-760. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.11.017.
[26] Kniha K, Brandt M, Bock A, et al.Accuracy of fully guided orthodontic mini-implant placement evaluated by cone-beam computed tomography: a study involving human cadaver heads[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2021,25(3):1299-1306. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-020-03436-9.
[27] Huang R, Liu Y, Huang B, et al.Improved scanning accuracy with newly designed scan bodies: an in vitro study comparing digital versus conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2020,31(7):625-633. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13598.
[28] Knechtle N, Wiedemeier D, Mehl A, et al.Accuracy of digital complete-arch, multi-implant scans made in the edentulous jaw with gingival movement simulation: an in vitro study[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.12.037.
[29] Kernen F, Benic GI, Payer M, et al.Accuracy of three-dimensional printed templates for guided implant placement based on matching a surface scan with CBCT[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2016,18(4):762-768. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12348.
[30] Bohner L, De Luca Canto G, Marció BS, et al. Computer-aided analysis of digital dental impressions obtained from intraoral and extraoral scanners[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2017,118(5):617-623. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.11.018.
[31] Zhou M, Zhou H, Li SY, et al.Dental implant location via surface scanner: a pilot study[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2020,20(1):306. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-020-01297-y.
[32] Gimenez-Gonzalez B, Hassan B, Özcan M, et al.An in vitro study of factors influencing the performance of digital intraoral impressions operating on active wavefront sampling technology with multiple implants in the edentulous maxilla[J]. J Prosthodont, 2017,26(8):650-655. DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12457.
[33] Abduo J, Elseyoufi M.Accuracy of intraoral scanners: a systematic review of influencing factors[J]. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent, 2018,26(3):101-121. DOI: 10.1922/EJPRD_01752Abduo21.
[34] Rutkunas V, Geciauskaite A, Jegelevicius D, et al. Accuracy of digital implant impressions with intraoral scanners. A systematic review[J]. Eur J Oral Implantol, 2017,10 Suppl 1:101-120.
[35] 周朝政. 颅颌面整形外科手术机器人关键技术研究[D]. 上海交通大学, 2017.
[36] Walter YHL, Henry YTN, Peter YPW, et al.Image calibration and registration in cone-beam computed tomogram for measuring the accuracy of computer-aided implant surgery[J]. Electronic Imaging, 2015, 9405: 94050A.
[37] Yen CY, Kuo PJ, Lin CY, et al.Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography in measuring thicknesses of hard-tissue-mimicking material adjacent to different implant thread surfaces[J]. J Dent Sci, 2019,14(2):119-125. DOI: 10.1016/j.jds.2019.04.001.
[38] 赵瑞强. CFRP制孔末端执行器设计及孔位识别算法研究[D]. 哈尔滨理工大学, 2021.
[39] 崔萌. 智能人机协同开颅手术机器人系统辅助开颅手术实验验证研究[D].中国人民解放军医学院,2019.DOI:10.27637/d.cnki.gjyjc.2019.000259.