The application of dynamic navigation system in dental implant training

doi:10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2022.08.010

Abstract

Abstract: Objective To explore the application of dynamic navigation technique in dental implant training. Methods 20 postgraduate students were included in the training course which combined theoretical course with model simulation operation. The theoretical course of implant dentistry was delivered first and subsequently all students performed free-hand and dynamic navigation implant surgery on the simulation jaw models in sequence. At the end of the course, an error analysis between the two techniques was conducted and a questionnaire was registered by the students, focusing on the comparisons of advantages and disadvantages between dynamic navigation system and free hand surgery, and put forward suggestions for improvement. ResultThe values of implant platform deviation, apical deviation and angle deviation in the dynamic navigation group were lower than those in the free-hand operation group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05), indicating that the students were more accurate in implant placement under the assistance of dynamic navigation.The results of the questionnaire survey show that dynamic navigation helps to improve the students' hands-on ability, increase their interest in learning, and the students' satisfaction is high. Conclusions The application of the dynamic navigation system in the implant training course has exhibited a satisfying teaching effect and is worthy of spreading.

Key words: Dynamic navigation system, Simulation jaw model, Dental implant training

Jiang Ruifang, Zhang Yanfang, Li Xue, Liu Liu, Xue Peng. The application of dynamic navigation system in dental implant training[J]. Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2022, 27(4): 254-258.

References

[1] D'haese J, Ackhurst J, Wismeijer D, et al. Current state of the art of computer-guided implant surgery[J]. Periodontol 2000, 2017,73(1):121-133. DOI: 10.1111/prd.12175.
[2] Joda T, Derksen W, Wittneben JG, et al. Static computer-aided implant surgery (s-cais) analysing patient-reported outcome measures (proms), economics and surgical complications: a systematic review[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2018,29 Suppl 16:359-373. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13136.
[3] 葛严军, 刘晓强, 王勇. 动态导航系统在口腔种植中的临床应用及展望[J].中国实用口腔科杂志,2020,13(8):449-455. DOI: 10.19538/j.kq.2020.08.001.
[4] Sun TM, Lan TH, Pan CY, et al. Dental implant navigation system guide the surgery future[J]. Kaohsiung J Med Sci, 2018,34(1):56-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.kjms.2017.08.011.
[5] 刘菁晶, 雒琪玥, 王婧, 等. 数字化技术在口腔种植专业研究生临床前教学中的应用[J].口腔疾病防治, 2020,28(8):530-534. DOI: 10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2020.08.010.
[6] 林野. 当代牙种植体设计进步与临床意义[J].华西口腔医学杂志,2017,35(1):18-28. DOI: 10.7518/hxkq.2017.01.003.
[7] 郑园娜, 王铭杰, 胡琳驰, 等. 数字化种植引入口腔种植本科课程教学的改革成效评价[J].浙江中医药大学学报,2018,42(1):87-91,96. DOI: 10.16466/j.issn1005-5509.2018.01.021.
[8] 张晓明, 苗德田, 惠敏. 以案例为引导模式在口腔种植学教学中的应用[J].中国继续医学教育,2021,13(36): 40-43. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9308.2021.36.011.
[9] 伍颖颖, 周丰, 向琳, 等. 数字化导板技术在口腔种植临床教学中的应用[J].医学教育研究与实践, 2021,29(3):469-472,481. DOI: 10.13555/j.cnki.c.m.e.2021.03.031.
[10] Egmir E, Erdem C, Kocyigit M, et al. Trends in educational research: a content analysis of the studies published in international journal of instruction[J].International Journal of Instruction,2017,10(3):277-294.DOI:10.12973/iji.2017.10318a.
[11] 赵世勇, 郭雪琪, 林炳鹏, 等. 数字化口腔医学技术在研究生教育中的应用教学研究[J].教育教学论坛,2021, (21):161-164.
[12] Zhan Y, Wang M, Cheng X, et al. Evaluation of a dynamic navigation system for training students in dental implant placement[J]. J Dent Educ, 2021,85(2):120-127. DOI: 10.1002/jdd.12399.
[13] Block MS, Emery RW, Lank K, et al. Implant placement accuracy using dynamic navigation[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2017,32(1):92-99. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.5004.
[14] 满毅, 周楠, 杨醒眉. 动态实时导航在口腔种植领域中的临床应用及新进展[J].口腔疾病防治,2020,28(6):341-345. DOI: 10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2020.06.001.
[15] Jorba-García A, Figueiredo R, González-Barnadas A, et al. Accuracy and the role of experience in dynamic computer guided dental implant surgery: an in-vitro study[J]. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 2019,24(1):e76-e83. DOI: 10.4317/medoral.22785.
[16] Sun TM, Lee HE, Lan TH. The influence of dental experience on a dental implant navigation system[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2019,19(1):222. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-019-0914-2.
[17] Golob Deeb J, Bencharit S, Carrico CK, et al. Exploring training dental implant placement using computer-guided implant navigation system for predoctoral students: a pilot study[J]. Eur J Dent Educ, 2019,23(4):415-423. DOI: 10.1111/eje.12447.
[18] Al-Ekrish AA, Ekram M. A comparative study of the accuracy and reliability of multidetector computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography in the assessment of dental implant site dimensions[J]. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 2011,40(2):67-75. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/27546065.
[19] Aydemir CA, Arisan V. Accuracy of dental implant placement via dynamic navigation or the freehand method: a split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2020,31(3):255-263. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13563.
[20] Chen CK, Yuh DY, Huang RY, et al. Accuracy of implant placement with a navigation system, a laboratory guide, and freehand drilling[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2018,33(6):1213-1218. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.6585.
[21] Stefanelli LV, DeGroot BS, Lipton DI, et al. Accuracy of a dynamic dental implant navigation system in a private practice[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2019,34(1):205-213. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.6966.