一种经口外装置控制的静态引导系统在种植外科的临床应用研究

doi:10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2021.10.006

中国口腔种植学杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (5): 299-305.DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2021.10.006

一种经口外装置控制的静态引导系统在种植外科的临床应用研究

刘峰^1,2, 董凯¹, 王美娟¹, 许胜¹, 周文娟¹, 柳忠豪¹

¹滨州医学院附属烟台口腔医院种植科 264000;
²大连医科大学 116000

收稿日期:2021-08-15 出版日期:2021-10-30 发布日期:2021-11-12
通讯作者: 周文娟,Email: zhouwenjuan1004@163.com,电话：0535-6223128
作者简介:刘峰,在读硕士研究生,研究方向：口腔颌面外科;周文娟,副主任医师、硕士生导师,研究方向：口腔种植及牙周病的诊疗,各类牙缺失的种植治疗,数字化种植, 美学种植,全口牙列缺失种植修复,种植区软硬组织缺损处理,种植并发症的处理等

Clinical application of a static guided system controlled by extraoral device in oral implant surgery

Liu Feng^1,2, Dong Kai¹, Wang Meijuan¹, Zhou Wenjuan¹, Xu Sheng¹, Liu Zhonghao¹

¹Department of Implant Dentistry, Yantai Stomatological Hospital Affiliated to Binzhou Medical University, Yantai 264000, China;
²Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China

Received:2021-08-15 Online:2021-10-30 Published:2021-11-12
Contact: Zhou Wenjuan, Email: zhouwenjuan1004@163.com, Tel: 0086-535-6223128

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的评价一种新型经口外装置控制的静态引导种植系统的临床精度与临床使用情况。材料和方法 临床招募单牙缺失骨量充足拟行种植修复治疗的患者45名,根据手术操作方式分为自由手组（A组）、静态导板组（B组）、口外静态装置组（C组）,通过评估术后患者满意度及医生操作体验评分,探讨不同术式的临床医患满意度,通过对比种植体实际植入位置与虚拟种植位置之间的差异,评价这种新型定位装置引导种植外科的临床精度。结果三组术式的入口偏差无统计学差异[（1.18±0.48) mm,(1.07±0.47) mm,(0.83±0.37) mm,P>0.05）];口外静态装置组在尖端及角度方面的偏差明显小于另外两组,差异具有统计学意义[尖端偏差：（1.60±0.76）mm,（1.42±0.40）mm,（1.03±0.54）mm,P<0.05;角度偏差：5.71º±3.54º,4.63º±2.52º,2.75º±1.90º,P<0.05]。三组患者的满意度评分为90~100,差异不具有统计学意义（P>0.05）。医生操作体验感评分中,对于手术视野满意度评分浮动较大,为60~100;其余各项评分在70~90,90~100之间。结论单牙缺失骨量充足时,经口外装置控制的新型静态引导种植系统可以实现良好的精度,具有一定的患者满意度和医生体验感。

关键词: 牙种植, 计算机辅助设计, 静态引导系统, 精度

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the clinical application and accuracy of a new static guided implant surgery system controlled by an extraoral device. Methods Forty-five patients with a single tooth missing were recruited, and the available bone of all included cases was sufficient. The patients were divided into three groups according to different surgical approaches: group 1, implantation with freehand; group 2, implantation guided by static surgery guide; and group 3, implantation guided via the new implant surgery system controlled by the extraoral device. By comparing the difference between the actual and virtual implant positions among the three groups, the clinical accuracy of the new implant surgery system was evaluated. Patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMS) and the operator related satisfaction were also evaluated. Results No statistical differences were found among groups with regard to the entrance deviation[(1.18±0.48）mm,(1.07±0.47) mm,(0.83±0.37) mm, P>0.05]. The accuracy of the new implant surgery system group at the apical part and for the angle aspect was higher than the other two groups [apical deviation: (1.60±6.76) mm, (1.42±4.40) mm, (1.03±0.54) mm, P<0.05; angle deviation: 5.71º±3.54º,4.63º±2.52º,2.75º±1.90º P<0.05]. For PROMS, there was no statistical difference among groups (P>0.05), and for the operator related satisfaction, the score of the operation visual field availability fluctuates greatly, ranging from 60 to 100. The score of other items was 70 to 90 and 90 to100. Conclusion For single tooth implantation with sufficient available bone, this new static guided system controlled by the extraoral device can achieve predictable clinical accuracy and acceptable patient and operator satisfaction.

Key words: Dental implant, Computer-aided design, Static guided system, Accuracy

刘峰,董凯,王美娟,等. 一种经口外装置控制的静态引导系统在种植外科的临床应用研究[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2021, 26(5): 299-305. DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2021.10.006

Liu Feng, Dong Kai, Wang Meijuan, Zhou Wenjuan, Xu Sheng, Liu Zhonghao. Clinical application of a static guided system controlled by extraoral device in oral implant surgery[J].Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2021, 26(5): 299-305.DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2021.10.006.

参考文献

[1] Cristache CM, Gurbanescu S.Accuracy evaluation of a stereolithographic surgical template for dental implant insertion using 3D superimposition protocol[J]. Int J Dent, 2017,2017:4292081. DOI: 10.1155/2017/4292081.
[2] Chang RJ, Chen HL, Huang LG, et al.Accuracy of implant placement with a computer-aided fabricated surgical template with guided parallel pins: a pilot study[J]. J Chin Med Assoc, 2018,81(11):970-976. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcma.2018.04.004.
[3] Kaewsiri D, Panmekiate S, Subbalekha K, et al.The accuracy of static vs. dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery in single tooth space: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2019,30(6):505-514. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13435.
[4] Block MS, Emery RW.Static or dynamic navigation for implant placement-choosing the method of guidance[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2016,74(2):269-277. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.09.022.
[5] Emery RW, Merritt SA, Lank K, et al.Accuracy of dynamic navigation for dental implant placement-model-based evaluation[J]. J Oral Implantol, 2016,42(5):399-405. DOI: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-16-00025.
[6] Tallarico M, Martinolli M, Kim Y, et al.Accuracy of computer-assisted template-based implant placement using two different surgical templates designed with or without metallic Sleeves: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Dent J (Basel), 2019,7(2). DOI: 10.3390/dj7020041.
[7] Kauffmann P, Rau A, Engelke W, et al.Accuracy of navigation-guided dental implant placement with screw versus hand template fixation in the edentulous mandible[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2018,33(2):383-388. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.5784.
[8] Zhou W, Liu Z, Song L, et al.Clinical factors affecting the accuracy of guided implant surgery-a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Evid Based Dent Pract, 2018,18(1):28-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2017.07.007.
[9] Wei SM, Zhu Y, Wei JX, et al.Accuracy of dynamic navigation in implant surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2021,32(4):383-393. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13719.
[10] Naziri E, Schramm A, Wilde F. Accuracy of computer-assisted implant placement with insertion templates[J]. GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW, 2016,5:Doc15. DOI: 10.3205/iprs000094.
[11] Tahmaseb A, Wu V, Wismeijer D, et al. The accuracy of static computer-aided implant surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2018,29 Suppl 16:416-435. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13346.
[12] Van Assche N, Vercruyssen M, Coucke W, et al. Accuracy of computer-aided implant placement[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2012,23 Suppl 6:112-123. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02552.x.
[13] Tahmaseb A, Wismeijer D, Coucke W, et al. Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: a systematic review[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2014,29 Suppl:25-42. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g1.2.
[14] Du Y, Wangrao K, Liu L, et al.Quantification of image artifacts from navigation markers in dynamic guided implant surgery and the effect on registration performance in different clinical scenarios[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2019,34(3):726-736. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.7179.
[15] 全国种植义齿学术工作研讨会会议纪要[J].中华口腔医学杂志,1995,30(5):307-309.
[16] Matta RE, Bergauer B, Adler W, et al.The impact of the fabrication method on the three-dimensional accuracy of an implant surgery template[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2017,45(6):804-808. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.02.015.
[17] Jacobs R, Quirynen M.Dental cone beam computed tomography: justification for use in planning oral implant placement[J]. Periodontol 2000, 2014,66(1):203-213. DOI: 10.1111/prd.12051.
[18] Derksen W, Wismeijer D, Flügge T, et al.The accuracy of computer-guided implant surgery with tooth-supported, digitally designed drill guides based on CBCT and intraoral scanning. a prospective cohort study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2019,30(10):1005-1015. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13514.
[19] Sun Y, Luebbers HT, Agbaje JO, et al.Accuracy of dental implant placement using CBCT-derived mucosa-supported stereolithographic template[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2015,17(5):862-870. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12189.
[20] Wismeijer D, Joda T, Flügge T, et al. Group 5 ITI consensus report: digital technologies[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2018,29 Suppl 16:436-442. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13309.
[21] Tallarico M, Kim YJ, Cocchi F, et al.Accuracy of newly developed sleeve-designed templates for insertion of dental implants: a prospective multicenters clinical trial[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2019,21(1):108-113. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12704.
[22] Geng W, Liu C, Su Y, et al.Accuracy of different types of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing surgical guides for dental implant placement[J]. Int J Clin Exp Med, 2015,8(6):8442-8449.
[23] 莫晖, 莫业跃, 庄秀妹, 等. 基于3D打印技术新型金属镂空式种植外科导板的临床应用[J].中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版),2014,8(2):128-133. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2014.02.009.
[24] Lee DH, An SY, Hong MH, et al.Accuracy of a direct drill-guiding system with minimal tolerance of surgical instruments used for implant surgery: a prospective clinical study[J]. J Adv Prosthodont, 2016,8(3):207-213. DOI: 10.4047/jap.2016.8.3.207.

一种经口外装置控制的静态引导系统在种植外科的临床应用研究

Clinical application of a static guided system controlled by extraoral device in oral implant surgery

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	周延民, 秦秋月. 上颌窦三维成骨模式促进上颌窦内成骨的临床意义[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(2): 69-76.
[2]	罗桂生, 刘雨蒙, 王鹏来, 袁长永. 微量元素改性PEEK种植体的研究进展[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(2): 109-113.
[3]	周延民, 朱悦萌. 上颌窦三维成骨模式构建[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(1): 9-18.
[4]	陈江. 机器人在口腔种植领域的应用[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2022, 27(5): 274-279.
[5]	马玉霄, 周立波, 孟凡文, 杨德钊, 王兆运, 段峰. 使用四种植入方法在下颌后牙区植入精度的体外对比分析[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2022, 27(4): 229-237.
[6]	章睿元, 仲维剑, 马国武. 根片屏障技术在即刻种植中的研究进展[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2022, 27(4): 238-242.
[7]	苏天月, 滕微微, 王琦, 舒倩怡, 周立波. 口腔种植体植入精度评估方法的应用进展[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2022, 27(4): 248-253.
[8]	龚佳明, 赵瑞敏, 王佳, 戴志明, 余占海, 殷丽华. 种植体周囊肿的系统性文献综述[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2022, 27(3): 181-187.
[9]	杨晶晶, 余正荣, 龚金梅, 胡常琦, 黄江琴, 魏洪武, 郭水根. 种植体根尖周病变1例及文献回顾[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2022, 27(2): 99-104.
[10]	周立波, 宿玉成, 李昕茹, 张立强, 陈德平. 比较个性化钛网与传统钛网在引导骨再生后暴露的系统综述[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2022, 27(2): 112-118.
[11]	曹晓军, 王丽杰, 王童, 李家鹤, 周文娟, 柳忠豪. 骨质类型对中老年患者种植修复长期稳定性的影响研究[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2021, 26(6): 376-381.
[12]	刘成武, 刘远翔, 李志鹏, 刘泉, 武诗语, 吴夏怡, 陈泽涛, 黄宝鑫, 陈卓凡. 两种不同螺纹设计的牙种植体在犬颌骨中骨结合的对比研究[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2021, 26(4): 226-231.
[13]	刘珊, 郭平川, 周国静. 影响数字化导板精准的临床分析[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2021, 26(3): 169-173.
[14]	石宇彤, 王翠, 胡文杰, 徐涛, 刘云松. 伴重度骨缺损的磨牙拔除后拔牙位点保存改善种植区软硬组织效果观察（附1例2.5年随访观察报告）[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2021, 26(3): 178-184.
[15]	陈泉林, 许胜, 周文娟, 陈琳, 柳忠豪. 计算机辅助动态导航技术在种植手术中的临床精度影响因素分析[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2021, 26(2): 85-90.