中国口腔种植学杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (4): 174-177.DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2019.12.007

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

慢性牙周炎患者的种植修复疗效观察

王志强, 庄文捷   

  1. 362000 福建省泉州医学高等专科学校附属人民医院口腔科
  • 出版日期:2019-12-10 发布日期:2021-09-07

Clinical effect of planting restoration in patients with chronic periodontitis

WANG Zhiqiang, ZHUANG Wenjie   

  1. The People's Hospital Affiliated to Quanzhou Medical College, Fujian Department of Stomatology, Quanzhou362000, Fujian Province, China
  • Online:2019-12-10 Published:2021-09-07

摘要: 目的: 探讨种植修复对慢性牙周炎患者的临床疗效。方法: 选取本院收治的96例进行种植修复患者作为研究对象,其中48例牙周健康患者为对照组,48例慢性牙周炎患者为研究组,两组患者均实施牙种植修复,对比两组患者3、6、12个月的PD(探诊深度)、mPLI(改良菌斑指数)、mSBI(改良龈沟出血指数),两组的种植修复情况和3年、5年的牙槽骨吸收量。结果: 种植修复后随时间增加,PD、mPLI、mSBI明显升高,且研究组PD显著高于对照组(P< 0.05);两组mPLI无显著差异(P> 0.05);两组3月的mSBI无显著差异(P> 0.05),6、12月研究组显著高于对照组(P< 0.05)。对照组种植修复情况均高于研究组,两组半年、1年的种植修复情况有差异但不明显(P> 0.05),对照组3年和5年的种植修复情况显著高于研究组(P< 0.05)。研究组3年、5年的牙槽骨吸收量均显著高于对照组(P< 0.05)。结论: 种植修复对慢性牙周炎患者的短期疗效较好,因炎症反应,长期效果明显低于牙周健康患者。

关键词: 种植修复, 慢性牙周炎, 临床疗效

Abstract: Objective: To investigate the clinical effect of Planting restorationin chronic periodontitis patients. Methods: 96 cases of Planting restorationpatients who were treated in our hospital were selected as the research object, including 48 healthy periodontal patients as the control group and 48 patients with chronic periodontitis as the study group. Both groups were treated with dental implantation. PD(probing depth), mPLI(modified plaque index), mSBI(modified gum crevicular bleeding index) was compared of the two groups after treatment for 3 months, 6 months and 12 months, and Implantation restoration and alveolar bone resorption in 3 years and 5 years in the two groups. Results: Increase with time after planting and restoration, the level of PD, mPLI, mSB were increased, the PD in the study group was significantly higher than the control group (P<0.05), there was no significantly different of mPLI in the two groups(P>0.05), the mSBI in 3 months of the two groups was not significantly different(P>0.05), and the mSBI in the study group was significantly higher than the control group at 6 and 12 months (P<0.05). The implantation restoration in the control group was higher than the study group, but there was no significant difference between the two groups in half a year and one year(P>0.05). The implantation restoration in the control group was significantly higher than the study group at 3 and 5 years (P<0.05). The alveolar bone resorption in the study group for 3 years and 5 years was significantly higher than the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion: The short-term effect of implantation repair on chronic periodontitis patients is better, the long-term effect is significantly lower than the healthy periodontal patients due to inflammatory reaction.

Key words: implant repair, chronic periodontitis, clinical effect

中图分类号: