Research progress on registration technology of digital impression and CBCT

doi:10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2021.12.013

Abstract

Abstract: In recent years, the rapid development of digital technology leads to great upgrading in dental technology and comprehensive changes in dental implantology. Dental implant placement through a digital implant surgical guide system brings many advantages, like keeping them minimally invasive, the reduction in operative times, and, mainly, a more safe application. However, the postoperative position assisted by the digital implant surgical guide still has a certain deviation from the ideal position of preoperative design. In the entire process of computer-assisted, digital implant guide surgery, from preoperative data collection, guide plate design, guide plate production and printing, to the operation process, multiple links may have an impact on the accuracy of implantation. The registration of digital impression data and CBCT in the design of digital implant surgical guides is considered to be one of the key technologies affecting the accuracy of static surgical guides. This review article introduces the current research status and error sources of registration technology of digital impression and CBCT, to provide beneficial references for oral clinical and basic research.

Key words: Registration, Digital impression, Cone-beam computed tomography, Digital implant surgical guide, Deviation

Li Shufen, Wei Bin. Research progress on registration technology of digital impression and CBCT[J]. Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2021, 26(6): 405-410.

References

[1] Swennen GR, Barth EL, Eulzer C, et al.The use of a new 3D splint and double CT scan procedure to obtain an accurate anatomic virtual augmented model of the skull[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2007,36(2):146-152. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2006.09.019.
[2] Swennen GR, Mommaerts MY, Abeloos J, et al.The use of a wax bite wafer and a double computed tomography scan procedure to obtain a three-dimensional augmented virtual skull model[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2007,18(3):533-539. DOI: 10.1097/scs.0b013e31805343df.
[3] Plooij JM, Maal TJ, Haers P, et al.Digital three-dimensional image fusion processes for planning and evaluating orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. A systematic review[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2011,40(4):341-352. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2010.10.013.
[4] Zitová B, Flusser J.Image registration methods: a survey[J].Image and vision computing,2003,21(11):977-1000.DOI:10.1016/S0262-8856(03)00137-9.
[5] Salvi J, Matabosch C,Fofi D,et al.A review of recent range image registration methods with accuracy evaluation[J].Image and Vision Computing,2007,25(5):578-596.DOI:10.1016/j.imavis.2006.05.012.
[6] Flügge T, Derksen W, Te Poel J, et al.Registration of cone beam computed tomography data and intraoral surface scans - a prerequisite for guided implant surgery with CAD/CAM drilling guides[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2017,28(9):1113-1118. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12925.
[7] Van Steenberghe D, Naert I, Andersson M, et al.A custom template and definitive prosthesis allowing immediate implant loading in the maxilla: a clinical report[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2002,17(5):663-670.
[8] Fortin T, Bosson JL, Coudert JL, et al.Reliability of preoperative planning of an image-guided system for oral implant placement based on 3-dimensional images: an in vivo study[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2003,18(6):886-893.
[9] Di Giacomo GA, Cury PR, de Araujo NS, et al. Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: preliminary results[J]. J Periodontol, 2005,76(4):503-507. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.4.503.
[10] 奚祺,吴国锋.数字化口内扫描技术的发展与应用[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2021,37(01):136-140.
[11] Henkel GL. A comparison of fixed prostheses generated from conventional vs digitally scanned dental impressions[J]. Compend Contin Educ Dent, 2007,28(8):422-424, 426-428, 430-431.
[12] 章登极. 基于面结构光立体视觉的三维测量技术研究[D].深圳大学, 2018.
[13] Van der Meer WJ, Andriessen FS, Wismeijer D, et al. Application of intra-oral dental scanners in the digital workflow of implantology[J]. PLoS One, 2012,7(8):e43312. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043312.
[14] Imburgia M, Logozzo S, Hauschild U, et al.Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: a comparative in vitro study[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2017,17(1):92. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-017-0383-4.
[15] Jamjoom FZ, Kim DG, McGlumphy EA, et al. Positional accuracy of a prosthetic treatment plan incorporated into a cone beam computed tomography scan using surface scan registration[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2018,120(3):367-374. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.11.019.
[16] Giménez B, Özcan M, Martínez-Rus F, et al.Accuracy of a digital impression system based on parallel confocal laser technology for implants with consideration of operator experience and implant angulation and depth[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2014,29(4):853-862. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.3343.
[17] Giménez B, Özcan M, Martínez-Rus F, et al. Accuracy of a digital impression system based on active wavefront sampling technology for implants considering operator experience, implant angulation,depth[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2015,17 Suppl 1:e54-64. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12124.
[18] Karl M, Rösch S, Graef F, et al.Strain situation after fixation of three-unit ceramic veneered implant superstructures[J]. Implant Dent, 2005,14(2):157-165. DOI: 10.1097/01.id.0000163809.37466.ac.
[19] Del'Acqua MA,Arioli-Filho JN,Compagnoni MA, et al. Accuracy of impression and pouring techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2008,23(2):226-236.
[20] Passos L, Meiga S, Brigagão V, et al.Impact of different scanning strategies on the accuracy of two current intraoral scanning systems in complete-arch impressions: an in vitro study[J]. Int J Comput Dent, 2019,22(4):307-319.
[21] Medina-Sotomayor P, Pascual-Moscardó A, Camps I.Accuracy of four digital scanners according to scanning strategy in complete-arch impressions[J]. PLoS One, 2018,13(9):e0202916. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202916.
[22] Vandeweghe S, Vervack V, Dierens M, et al.Accuracy of digital impressions of multiple dental implants: an in vitro study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2017,28(6):648-653. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12853.
[23] Müller P, Ender A, Joda T, et al.Impact of digital intraoral scan strategies on the impression accuracy using the TRIOS Pod scanner[J]. Quintessence Int, 2016,47(4):343-349. DOI: 10.3290/j.qi.a35524.
[24] Flügge TV, Att W, Metzger MC, et al.Precision of dental implant digitization using intraoral scanners[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2016,29(3):277-283. DOI: 10.11607/ijp.4417.
[25] Su TS, Sun J.Comparison of repeatability between intraoral digital scanner and extraoral digital scanner: an in-vitro study[J]. J Prosthodont Res, 2015,59(4):236-242. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpor.2015.06.002.
[26] 王勇. 口内数字印模技术[J].口腔医学,2015,(9):705-709,743.
[27] Andriessen FS, Rijkens DR, van der Meer WJ, et al. Applicability and accuracy of an intraoral scanner for scanning multiple implants in edentulous mandibles: a pilot study[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2014,111(3):186-194. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.07.010.
[28] Quaas S, Rudolph H, Luthardt RG.Direct mechanical data acquisition of dental impressions for the manufacturing of CAD/CAM restorations[J]. J Dent, 2007,35(12):903-908. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2007.08.008.
[29] Schulze R, Heil U, Gross D, et al.Artefacts in CBCT: a review[J]. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 2011,40(5):265-273. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/30642039.
[30] Vercruyssen M, Hultin M, Van Assche N, et al.Guided surgery: accuracy and efficacy[J]. Periodontol 2000, 2014,66(1):228-246. DOI: 10.1111/prd.12046.
[31] Schnutenhaus S, Gröller S, Luthardt RG, et al.Accuracy of the match between cone beam computed tomography and model scan data in template-guided implant planning: a prospective controlled clinical study[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2018,20(4):541-549. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12614.
[32] Rußig LL, Schulze RK.Effects of minute misregistrations of prefabricated markers for image-guided dental implant surgery: an analytical evaluation[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2013,24(12):1339-1346. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12005.
[33] Ye N, Long H, Xue J, et al.Integration accuracy of laser-scanned dental models into maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography images of different voxel sizes with different segmentation threshold settings[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol, 2014,117(6):780-786. DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2014.02.022.
[34] Sur J, Seki K, Koizumi H, et al.Effects of tube current on cone-beam computerized tomography image quality for presurgical implant planning in vitro[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2010,110(3):e29-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.03.041.
[35] Shaheen E, Khalil W, Ezeldeen M, et al.Accuracy of segmentation of tooth structures using 3 different CBCT machines[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol, 2017,123(1):123-128. DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2016.09.005.
[36] Nilsson J, Richards RG, Thor A, et al.Virtual bite registration using intraoral digital scanning, CT and CBCT: in vitro evaluation of a new method and its implication for orthognathic surgery[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2016,44(9):1194-1200. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.06.013.
[37] 沈宇清,余优成,孙健,等. 口内扫描与锥形束CT重建牙颌数字化模型的测量分析[J].精准医学杂志, 2020,35(5): 428-431,436. DOI: 10.13362/j.jpmed.202005011.
[38] Young-Su Choi,Moon-Key Kim,Jae-Won Lee,et al.Impact of the number of registration points for replacement of three-dimensional computed tomography images in dental areas using three-dimensional light-scanned images of dental models[J].Oral Radiology,2014,30(1):32-37.DOI:10.1007/s11282-013-0136-2.
[39] Oh JH, An X, Jeong SM, et al.Digital workflow for computer-guided implant surgery in edentulous patients: a case report[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2017,75(12):2541-2549. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2017.08.008.
[40] An X, Yang HW, Choi BH.Digital Workflow for Computer-Guided Implant Surgery in Edentulous Patients with an Intraoral Scanner and Old Complete Denture[J]. J Prosthodont, 2019,28(6):715-718. DOI: 10.1111/jopr.13073.
[41] Park JH, Hwang CJ, Choi YJ, et al.Registration of digital dental models and cone-beam computed tomography images using 3-dimensional planning software: Comparison of the accuracy according to scanning methods and software[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2020,157(6):843-851. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.12.013.
[42] Deferm JT, Nijsink J, Baan F, et al.Soft tissue-based registration of intraoral scan with cone beam computed tomography scan[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2021,DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2021.04.004.