数字化钛网与可吸收性胶原膜骨增量效果的对比——一项回顾性研究

doi:10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2025.02.005

中国口腔种植学杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (1): 19-26.DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2025.02.005

• “3D 打印个性化钛网”重点栏目 • 上一篇下一篇

数字化钛网与可吸收性胶原膜骨增量效果的对比——一项回顾性研究

李松航, 蔡潇潇

口腔疾病研究国家重点实验室国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心四川大学华西口腔医院种植科,成都 610041

收稿日期:2024-11-06 出版日期:2025-02-28 发布日期:2025-02-24
通讯作者: 蔡潇潇,Email：xcai@scu.edu.cn,电话：028-85503579
作者简介:李松航,副研究员,研究方向：数字化技术在口腔种植领域的应用;蔡潇潇,教授、博士研究生导师,研究方向：口腔种植外科与修复
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（82322015、82401189）; 四川大学华西口腔医院探索与研发项目（LCYJ2020-DC-1）; 国家资助博士后人员计划（GZB20230468）; 四川省自然科学基金（2025ZNSFSC0748）

Comparison of bone augmentation effects between digital titanium mesh and resorbable collagen membrane: a retrospective study

Li Songhang, Cai Xiaoxiao

State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Oral Implantology, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China

Received:2024-11-06 Online:2025-02-28 Published:2025-02-24
Contact: Cai Xiaoxiao, Email: xcai@scu.edu.cn, Tel: 0086-28-85503579
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (82322015, 82401189); Exploration and R&D Project of West China Hospital of Stomatology (LCYJ2020-DC-1); Postdoctoral Fellowship Program of CPSF (GZB20230468); Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province (2025ZNSFSC0748)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的对比评估数字化钛网与可吸收性胶原膜在骨增量后的临床效果。方法回顾性收集2019年1月至2020年12月于四川大学华西口腔医院种植科就诊的Terheyden 2/4或3/4型骨缺损患者24例,并将其分为可吸收性胶原膜组（12例）和数字化钛网组（12例）。2组患者分别在引导骨再生阶段采用了可吸收性胶原膜和数字化钛网作为屏障。在术前（T₁）、术后（T₂）、二期手术前（T₃）及负荷后1年（T₄）对患者的牙槽骨进行二维和三维水平的测量分析,从而对硬组织稳定性进行评估。结果可吸收性胶原膜组及数字化钛网组均能够在术后达到出色的骨增量效果,可吸收性胶原膜组在术后平均单牙位骨增量354.43 mm³（330.04,403.93）,数字化钛网组则在术后获得了368.98 mm³（320.90,441.61）骨增量。尽管在术后可吸收性胶原膜组唇侧骨板均厚于数字化钛网组,然而在经过愈合期及负荷期后,数字化钛网组在唇侧骨板各位点厚于可吸收性胶原膜组。不论是在短期愈合还是长期行使功能后,数字化钛网组的唇舌侧骨板吸收量均要小于可吸收性胶原膜组。除此之外,在三维体积上,负荷1年后,数字化钛网组牙槽骨平均吸收154.83 mm³（142.65,178.76）,可吸收性胶原膜组平均单牙位吸收量207.18 mm³（184.94,256.44）,存在统计学差异,数字化钛网表现出了出色的骨保存结果。结论数字化钛网的骨增量效果更好,其能够通过在早期愈合阶段维持稳定的成骨空间,并对负荷后产生积极影响。

关键词: 钛网, 引导骨再生, 可吸收性胶原膜, 骨增量

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the clinical outcomes of bone augmentation using digital titanium mesh versus absorbable collagen membrane. Methods From January 2019 to December 2020, 24 patients with Terheyden type 2/4 or 3/4 bone defects were treated at the Department of Oral Implantology, West China Hospital of Stomatology. These patients were divided into two groups: the absorbable collagen membrane group (12 cases) and digital titanium mesh group (12 cases). Both groups underwent guided bone regeneration with absorbable collagen membrane and digital titanium mesh as barrier membranes, respectively. The two-dimensional and three-dimensional measurements of alveolar bone were taken at four time points: pre-surgery (T₁), post- surgery (T₂), before second-stage surgery (T₃), and one year after loading (T₄), to evaluate hard tissue stability. Results Both the absorbable collagen membrane group and the digital titanium mesh group achieved excellent bone augmentation outcomes after surgery. The average single-tooth augmentation was 354.43 mm³ (330.04, 403.93) in the absorbable membrane group, and in the digital titanium mesh group, it was 368.98 mm³ (320.90, 441.61). Although the labial bone in the absorbable collagen membrane group was thicker than in the digital titanium mesh group at T₂, after the healing and loading periods, the digital titanium mesh group exhibited thicker labial bone at all measurement points. Both in the short-term healing and long-term functional phases, the resorption of the labiolingual bone in the digital titanium mesh group was lower than in the absorbable collagen membrane group. Additionally, the digital titanium mesh group showed superior bone preservation results in terms of three-dimensional volume. Conclusion Digital titanium mesh offers superior bone augmentation effects compared to absorbable collagen membranes. It maintains a stable osteogenic space during the early healing phase and exerts a positive influence during the loading phase.

Key words: Titanium mesh, Guided bone regeneration, Resorbable collagen membrane, Bone augmentation

李松航,蔡潇潇. 数字化钛网与可吸收性胶原膜骨增量效果的对比——一项回顾性研究[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2025, 30(1): 19-26. DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2025.02.005

Li Songhang, Cai Xiaoxiao. Comparison of bone augmentation effects between digital titanium mesh and resorbable collagen membrane: a retrospective study[J].Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2025, 30(1): 19-26.DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2025.02.005.

参考文献

[1] Bassir SH, Alhareky M, Wangsrimongkol B, et al.Systematic review and meta-analysis of hard tissue outcomes of alveolar ridge preservation[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2018,33(5):979-994. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.6399.
[2] Buser D, Chappuis V, Belser UC, et al.Implant placement post extraction in esthetic single tooth sites: when immediate, when early, when late?[J]. Periodontol 2000, 2017,73(1):84-102. DOI: 10.1111/prd.12170.
[3] Araújo MG, Silva CO, Misawa M, et al.Alveolar socket healing: what can we learn?[J]. Periodontol 2000, 2015,68(1):122-134. DOI: 10.1111/prd.12082.
[4] Retzepi M, Donos N.Guided Bone Regeneration: biological principle and therapeutic applications[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2010,21(6):567-576. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01922.x.
[5] Donos N, Dereka X, Mardas N.Experimental models for guided bone regeneration in healthy and medically compromised conditions[J]. Periodontol 2000, 2015,68(1):99-121. DOI: 10.1111/prd.12077.
[6] Chappuis V, Rahman L, Buser R, et al.Effectiveness of contour augmentation with guided bone regeneration: 10-year results[J]. J Dent Res, 2018,97(3):266-274. DOI: 10.1177/0022034517737755.
[7] Benic GI, Hämmerle CH.Horizontal bone augmentation by means of guided bone regeneration[J]. Periodontol 2000, 2014,66(1):13-40. DOI: 10.1111/prd.12039.
[8] Wessing B, Lettner S, Zechner W.Guided bone regeneration with collagen membranes and particulate graft materials: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2018,33(1):87-100. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.5461.
[9] Arunjaroensuk S, Panmekiate S, Pimkhaokham A.The stability of augmented bone between two different membranes used for guided bone regeneration simultaneous with dental implant placement in the esthetic zone[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2018,33(1):206-216. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.5492.
[10] Elgali I, Omar O, Dahlin C, et al.Guided bone regeneration: materials and biological mechanisms revisited[J]. Eur J Oral Sci, 2017,125(5):315-337. DOI: 10.1111/eos.12364.
[11] Kohal RJ, Straub LM, Wolkewitz M, et al.Evaluation of guided bone regeneration around oral implants over different healing times using two different bovine bone materials: a randomized, controlled clinical and histological investigation[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2015,17(5):957-971. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12206.
[12] Urban IA, Lozada JL, Wessing B, et al.Vertical bone grafting and periosteal vertical mattress suture for the fixation of resorbable membranes and stabilization of particulate grafts in horizontal guided bone regeneration to achieve more predictable results: a technical report[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2016,36(2):153-159. DOI: 10.11607/prd.2627.
[13] Hasegawa H, Masui S, Ishihata H, et al.Evaluation of a newly designed microperforated pure titanium membrane for guided bone regeneration[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2019,34(2):411-422. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.6777.
[14] Rakhmatia YD, Ayukawa Y, Furuhashi A, et al.Current barrier membranes: titanium mesh and other membranes for guided bone regeneration in dental applications[J]. J Prosthodont Res, 2013,57(1):3-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpor.2012.12.001.
[15] Schwarz F, Herten M, Ferrari D, et al.Guided bone regeneration at dehiscence-type defects using biphasic hydroxyapatite + beta tricalcium phosphate (Bone Ceramic) or a collagen-coated natural bone mineral (BioOss Collagen): an immunohistochemical study in dogs[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2007,36(12):1198-1206. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2007.07.014.
[16] Trento GS, Carvalho P, Macedo DV, et al.Titanium mesh associated with rhBMP-2 in alveolar ridge reconstruction[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2019,48(4):546-553. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2018.09.015.
[17] Zhang T, Zhang T, Cai X.The application of a newly designed L-shaped titanium mesh for GBR with simultaneous implant placement in the esthetic zone: a retrospective case series study[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2019,21(5):862-872. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12726.
[18] Chiapasco M, Casentini P.Horizontal bone-augmentation procedures in implant dentistry: prosthetically guided regeneration[J]. Periodontol 2000, 2018,77(1):213-240. DOI: 10.1111/prd.12219.
[19] Coachman C, Paravina RD.Digitally enhanced esthetic dentistry - from treatment planning to quality control[J]. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2016,28(Suppl 1):S3-S4. DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12205.
[20] Coachman C, Calamita MA, Sesma N.Dynamic documentation of the smile and the 2D/3D digital smile design process[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2017,37(2):183-193. DOI: 10.11607/prd.2911.
[21] Smitkarn P, Subbalekha K, Mattheos N, et al.The accuracy of single-tooth implants placed using fully digital-guided surgery and freehand implant surgery[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2019,46(9):949-957. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13160.
[22] Li S, Zhang T, Zhou M, et al.A novel digital and visualized guided bone regeneration procedure and digital precise bone augmentation: a case series[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2021,23(1):19-30. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12959.
[23] Lim HC, Lee JS, Choi SH, et al.The effect of overlaying titanium mesh with collagen membrane for ridge preservation[J]. J Periodontal Implant Sci, 2015,45(4):128-135. DOI: 10.5051/jpis.2015.45.4.128.
[24] Abrahamsson P, Wälivaara DÅ, Isaksson S, et al.Periosteal expansion before local bone reconstruction using a new technique for measuring soft tissue profile stability: a clinical study[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2012,70(10):e521-e530. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2012.06.003.
[25] Elnayef B, Porta C, Suárez-López Del Amo F, et al. The fate of lateral ridge augmentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2018,33(3):622-635. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.6290.
[26] de Freitas RM, Susin C, Spin-Neto R, et al. Horizontal ridge augmentation of the atrophic anterior maxilla using rhBMP-2/ACS or autogenous bone grafts: a proof-of-concept randomized clinical trial[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2013,40(10):968-975. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12148.
[27] Merli M, Migani M, Bernardelli F, et al.Vertical bone augmentation with dental implant placement: efficacy and complications associated with 2 different techniques. a retrospective cohort study[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006, 21(4): 600-606. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2006.02.021.
[28] Papaspyridakos P, Chen CJ, Singh M, et al.Success criteria in implant dentistry: a systematic review[J]. J Dent Res, 2012,91(3):242-248. DOI: 10.1177/0022034511431252.
[29] 谢雨, 蔡潇潇. 钛网在口腔种植骨增量中的应用研究进展[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2021,56(4):390-395. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20200802-00445.
Xie Y,Cai XX.Research progress in titanium mesh application for bone augmentation in oral implantology[J].Chin J Stomatol,2021,56(4):390-395. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20200802-00445.
[30] Liu C, Li JM, Zhang S, et al.Assessment of the application of a novel three-dimension printing individualized titanium mesh in alveolar bone augmentation: a retrospective study[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2023,25(2): 352-369. DOI:10.1111/cid.13173.
[31] 满毅, 王天璐. 钛网在口腔种植骨量扩增中的应用[J].口腔颌面外科杂志,2015,(4):241-245. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-4979.2015.04.001.
Man Y, Wang TL.Titanium mesh for bone augmentation in implant dentistry[J].J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2015,(4):241-245. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-4979.2015.04.001.
[32] 季平, 杨生. 个性化钛网在口腔种植骨增量中的应用[J].口腔医学研究,2019,35(11):1011-1015. DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2019.11.001.
Ji P, Yang S.Application of custom-made titanium mesh in implant dentistry for bone augmentation[J].J Oral Sci Res,2019,35(11):1011-1015. DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2019.11.001.
[33] Jiang X, Zhang Y, Di P, et al.Hard tissue volume stability of guided bone regeneration during the healing stage in the anterior maxilla: a clinical and radiographic study[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2018,20(1):68-75. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12570.
[34] Zita Gomes R, Paraud Freixas A, Han CH, et al.Alveolar ridge reconstruction with titanium meshes and simultaneous implant placement: a retrospective, multicenter clinical study[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2016,2016:5126838. DOI: 10.1155/2016/5126838.
[35] Hartmann A, Seiler M.Minimizing risk of customized titanium mesh exposures - a retrospective analysis[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2020,20(1):36. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-020-1023-y.
[36] Briguglio F, Falcomatà D, Marconcini S, et al.The use of titanium mesh in guided bone regeneration: a systematic review[J]. Int J Dent, 2019,2019:9065423. DOI: 10.1155/2019/9065423.
[37] Uehara S, Kurita H, Shimane T, et al.Predictability of staged localized alveolar ridge augmentation using a micro titanium mesh[J]. Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2015,19(4):411-416. DOI: 10.1007/s10006-015-0513-6.
[38] Miyamoto I, Funaki K, Yamauchi K, et al.Alveolar ridge reconstruction with titanium mesh and autogenous particulate bone graft: computed tomography-based evaluations of augmented bone quality and quantity[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2012,14(2):304-311. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00257.x.
[39] 白丽云, 季平, 李显, 等. 不同厚度的3D打印个性化钛网的三维有限元分析[J].口腔医学研究,2019,35(1):75-79. DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2019.01.018.
Bai LY, Ji P,Li X, et al.Three dimensional finite element analysis of customized titanium mesh with different thicknesses[J].J Oral Sci Res,2019,35(1):75-79. DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2019.01.018.
[40] 李林芝, 陈丹, 黄元丁, 等. 三维打印个性化钛网联合引导骨再生术修复牙槽骨缺损的临床初探[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2019,54(9):623-627. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1002-0098.2019.09.008.
Li LZ, Chen D, Huang YD, et al.Preliminary application assessment of individualized three-dimensional printing titanium mesh combined with guided bone regeneration for repairing alveolar bone defects[J].Chin J Stomatol,2019,54(9):623-627. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1002-0098.2019.09.008.
[41] 袁帅, 陈陶, 李帝泽, 等. 三维打印个性化钛网在美学区牙槽骨缺损骨增量中应用的效果评估[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2020,55(11):878-884. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20200702-00393.
Yuan S,Chen T,Li DZ,et al.Assessment of the clinical effect regarding three-dimensional printing individualized titanium mesh for bone augmentation in the esthetic area[J].Chin J Stomatol,2020,55(11):878-884. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20200702-00393.

数字化钛网与可吸收性胶原膜骨增量效果的对比——一项回顾性研究

Comparison of bone augmentation effects between digital titanium mesh and resorbable collagen membrane: a retrospective study

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	宿玉成, 任斌. 3D打印个性化钛网支撑的引导骨再生术后钛网暴露的原因、预防与治疗[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2025, 30(1): 5-12.
[2]	王怀升, 韩泽奎, 臧旖欣, 宋振宇, 宋颐函, 孙子惠, 王心彧. 个性化钛网辅助修复大范围下颌牙槽骨缺损的静态力学分析[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2025, 30(1): 13-18.
[3]	熊振杰, 魏永祥, 刘倩, 陈雅馨, 郭雪琪, 季若桐, 苏汉福, 邹耀堃, 王丽萍. 3D打印个性化钛网用于修复严重牙槽骨缺损的临床效果——一项回顾性病例系列研究[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2025, 30(1): 27-34.
[4]	杨敏雪, 李帝泽, 陈陶. 钛网辅助引导骨再生下假骨膜的研究进展[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2025, 30(1): 35-39.
[5]	欧艳晶, 陈江. 血小板浓缩生长因子在上颌窦底提升中的应用效果评价[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2024, 29(6): 596-601.
[6]	邱立新, 牛力璇. 下颌后牙区垂直骨量不足的解决方案[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2024, 29(5): 400-406.
[7]	周丹红, 胡玲, 周国栋, 邱悦声, 姜治伟, 杨国利. 上颌窦外侧壁来源骨块在牙槽嵴水平帐篷植骨技术中的应用[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2024, 29(5): 407-412.
[8]	张硕, 刘畅, 肖含瑜, 张伟峰, 邓焕泽, 张健. 生物可吸收性胶原膜的固定方式对上颌前牙区水平骨增量效果的影响[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2024, 29(5): 420-428.
[9]	陈钢. 骨环技术纠正种植三维骨量不足的临床回顾研究[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2024, 29(5): 429-434.
[10]	高明, 牛力璇, 朱一博. 应用自体牙本质块行骨增量的临床和组织学研究[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2024, 29(5): 435-439.
[11]	杜奥博, 满毅. 美学区分阶段骨增量联合邻牙显微根尖手术的治疗策略：临床诊治流程及实践病例[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2024, 29(5): 440-444.
[12]	万鹏. 美学区应用不可吸收性屏障膜进行骨增量的5年临床观察[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2024, 29(5): 445-452.
[13]	邱韵, 王宇蓝, 张玉峰. 骨质疏松症对牙种植的影响及临床考量[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2024, 29(4): 336-341.
[14]	周颖, 丛龙凤, 张翔, 王晟. 牙槽骨重度缺损的前牙拔牙窝不翻瓣骨增量位点重建后种植修复病例报告1例[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2024, 29(4): 358-361.
[15]	陈江, 丘雨蓓. 数字化技术在口腔种植骨增量中的应用及研究进展[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2024, 29(3): 252-257.