中国口腔种植学杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (6): 610-615.DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2024.12.026

• 教育教学与管理 • 上一篇    

布鲁姆目标分类理论在口腔种植学住院医师规范化培训中的应用

李福龙1, 邓宇2, 田思睿1, 高静1, 赵宝红1   

  1. 1中国医科大学口腔医学院口腔种植中心 辽宁省口腔疾病重点实验室 辽宁省口腔疾病转化医学研究中心,沈阳 110002;
    2中国医科大学口腔医学院·附属口腔医院毕业后培训部,沈阳 110002
  • 收稿日期:2024-06-05 出版日期:2025-01-02 发布日期:2025-01-02
  • 通讯作者: 赵宝红,Email:bhzhao@cmu.edu.cn,电话:024-31927731
  • 作者简介:李福龙 博士、主治医师,研究方向:口腔种植学;赵宝红 教授、主任医师、博士研究生导师,研究方向:种植体表面改性、种植体的结构优化及生物力学
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(82071151); 辽宁省自然科学基金(20170541059)

Application of Bloom’s Taxonomy in the standardized residency training program for implant dentistry

Li Fulong1, Deng Yu2, Tian Sirui1, Gao Jing1, Zhao Baohong1   

  1. 1Department of Dental Implantology, School of Stomatology, China Medical University, Liaoning Provincial Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Liaoning Provincial Translational Medicine Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shenyang 110002, Liaoning, China;
    2China Medical University-Affiliated Stomatology Hospital Education Department for After Graduation, Shenyang 110002, Liaoning, China
  • Received:2024-06-05 Online:2025-01-02 Published:2025-01-02
  • Contact: Zhao Baohong, Email: bhzhao@cmu.edu.cn, Tel: 0086-24-31927731
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China (82071151); Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province (20170541059)

摘要: 目的 探讨布鲁姆目标分类理论在口腔种植学住院医师规范化培训(简称“住培”)中的应用效果,评估其对学员知识、技能和临床实践能力的影响。方法 选取在中国医科大学口腔医学院种植中心2023年1月至7月轮转的33名住院医师为对照组(传统教学模式教学)及2024年1月至7月轮转的31名住院医师为试验组(布鲁姆目标分类理论教学)。在住培即将结束前的1个月,通过知识测试、技能评估和临床表现评价等方式收集数据,评估2种方法的教学效果。结果 经过布鲁姆目标分类理论教学的口腔种植学住培学员在理论考核和技能操作检验方面均取得了显著的提高。学员的理论知识掌握程度明显提升[对照组成绩(34.97±3.26)分,试验组成绩(42.32±3.42)分,P<0.001],临床案例分析运用也得到了显著加强[对照组成绩(39.24±2.56)分,试验组成绩(43.03±2.36)分,P<0.001]。同时,住培学员在病史采集、临床检查、治疗设计、病历书写和操作技能方面表现出更高水平的能力[对照组总成绩(74.13±5.08)分,试验组总成绩(80.77±6.10)分,P<0.001]。结论 布鲁姆目标分类理论对口腔种植学住培教学效果的提升具有积极的促进作用。

关键词: 布鲁姆目标分类理论, 口腔种植学, 住院医师, 规范化培训, 教学方法

Abstract: Objective To investigate the effectiveness of applying Bloom’s Taxonomy in the standardized training of oral implantology residents and evaluate its impact on the knowledge, skills, and clinical practice abilities of the trainees. Methods A total of 33 residents who completed a clinical rotation in the oral implantology department from January to July 2023 were selected as the control group (traditional teaching mode), while 31 residents who rotated in the same department from January to July 2024 were selected as the experimental group (Bloom's Taxonomy-based teaching). Data were collected one month before the completion of the training program, including knowledge tests, skill assessments, and evaluations of clinical performance, to assess the teaching effectiveness of both approaches. Results Residents trained with Bloom’s Taxonomy demonstrated significant improvements in both theoretical assessments and practical skill operations. The experimental group showed a notable increase in theoretical knowledge (control group score: 34.97±3.26, experimental group score: 42.32±3.42, P<0.001) and enhanced ability to apply clinical case analysis (control group score: 39.24±2.56, experimental group score: 43.03±2.36, P<0.001). Moreover, the experimental group performed better in medical history collection, clinical examination, treatment planning, medical record documentation, and procedural skills (control group total score: 74.13±5.08, experimental group total score: 80.77±6.10, P<0.001). Conclusion The application of Bloom's Taxonomy positively enhances the standardized training of implant dentistry.

Key words: Bloom's Taxonomy, Oral implantology, Resident physicians, Standardized training, Teaching methods