立体摄影测量技术在全口种植修复印模制取中应用的文献回顾

doi:10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2024.12.023

中国口腔种植学杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (6): 590-595.DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2024.12.023

立体摄影测量技术在全口种植修复印模制取中应用的文献回顾

雷妍汐¹, 袁泉^1,2, 吕鸣樾^1,2

¹口腔疾病研究国家重点实验室国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心,成都 610041;
²四川大学华西口腔医院种植科,成都 610041

收稿日期:2024-07-16 出版日期:2025-01-02 发布日期:2025-01-02
通讯作者: 吕鸣樾,Email：lvmingyue9292@163.com,电话：028-85503571
作者简介:雷妍汐口腔医学八年制在读,研究方向：口腔种植修复、骨发育;吕鸣樾医师、口腔种植学博士,研究方向：全口种植修复精度、干细胞成骨分化
基金资助:
中华口腔医学会青年临床科研基金（CSA-SIS2022-19）; 四川省科技厅青年自然科学基金（2023NSFSC0567）

Application of stereophotogrammetry in complete-arch implant impression making: a literature review

Lei Yanxi¹, Yuan Quan^1,2, Lyu Mingyue^1,2

¹State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Disease, Chengdu 610041, China;
²Depratment of Oral Implantology, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China

Received:2024-07-16 Online:2025-01-02 Published:2025-01-02
Contact: Lyu Mingyue, Email: lvmingyue9292@163.com, Tel: 0086-28-85503571
Supported by:
Young Clinical Research Fund of the Chinese Stomatological Association (CSA-SIS2022-19); Sichuan Science and Technology Program (2023NSFSC0567)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 印模的精度与全牙弓种植固定修复体的被动就位密切相关,并影响其长期效果。传统开窗印模技术在全口种植修复中具有较高的精度,被视为金标准。随着数字化技术的不断发展,立体摄影测量技术（stereophotogrammetry,SPG）目前已应用于全口种植的数字化印模制取。与传统开窗印模技术相比,SPG具有椅旁时间短、患者舒适度高、操作流程简化等优势,但其精度尚存争议。本文就SPG的原理与使用方法、体内外研究与应用、印模精度的影响因素等进行综述,以期能为SPG的发展提供参考依据。

关键词: 立体摄影测量技术, 印模, 精度, 全口种植修复

Abstract: The accuracy of impressions is closely related to the passive fit of complete-arch implant-supported prostheses, which significantly affects their long-term outcomes. Conventional open-tray impression techniques have been recognized for their high accuracy in full-arch implant restorations and are still regarded as the gold standard. However, with the ongoing advancements in digital technology, stereophotogrammetry (SPG) has been introduced for digital impression-making in complete-arch implant cases. Compared to the traditional open-tray technique, SPG offers advantages such as reduced chair time, increased patient comfort, and a simplified workflow. Despite these benefits, the accuracy of SPG remains a topic of debate. This article reviews the principles and methods of SPG, its in vivo and in vitro applications, and factors influencing impression accuracy, to provide a reference for further development of SPG in implant dentistry.

Key words: Stereophotogrammetry, Impression, Accuracy, Complete-arch implant-supported restoration

雷妍汐,袁泉,吕鸣樾. 立体摄影测量技术在全口种植修复印模制取中应用的文献回顾[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2025, 29(6): 590-595. DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2024.12.023

Lei Yanxi, Yuan Quan, Lyu Mingyue. Application of stereophotogrammetry in complete-arch implant impression making: a literature review[J].Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2025, 29(6): 590-595.DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2024.12.023.

参考文献

[1] Revilla-León M, Att W, Özcan M, et al.Comparison of conventional, photogrammetry, and intraoral scanning accuracy of complete-arch implant impression procedures evaluated with a coordinate measuring machine[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2021,125(3):470-478. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.03.005.
[2] Chadwick RG.Close range photogrammetry-a clinical dental research tool[J]. J Dent, 1992,20(4):235-239. DOI: 10.1016/0300-5712(92)90093-r.
[3] Lie A, Jemt T.Photogrammetric measurements of implant positions. description of a technique to determine the fit between implants and superstructures[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 1994,5(1):30-36. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1994.050104.x.
[4] Klaus K, Jivraj S.3D printing protocols in full-arch reconstruction: a complete workflow[M]. Cham: Springer, 2023:117-127.
[5] Gómez-Polo M, Barmak AB, Ortega R, et al.Accuracy, scanning time, and patient satisfaction of stereophotogrammetry systems for acquiring 3D dental implant positions: a systematic review[J]. J Prosthodont, 2023,32(2):208-224. DOI: 10.1111/jopr.13751.
[6] Zhang S, Chen W, Lin Y, et al.A digital technique for transferring the maxillomandibular relationship for complete arch implant rehabilitation in edentulous jaws[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2024,132(4):688-694. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.06.026.
[7] Agustín-Panadero R, Peñarrocha-Oltra D, Gomar-Vercher S, et al.Stereophotogrammetry for recording the position of multiple implants: technical description[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2015,28(6):631-636. DOI: 10.11607/ijp.4146.
[8] Cheng J, Zhang H, Liu H, et al.Accuracy of edentulous full-arch implant impression: an in vitro comparison between conventional impression, intraoral scan with and without splinting, and photogrammetry[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2024,35(5):560-572. DOI: 10.1111/clr.14252.
[9] Ma B, Yue X, Sun Y, et al.Accuracy of photogrammetry, intraoral scanning, and conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation: an in vitro comparative study[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2021,21(1):636. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-021-02005-0.
[10] Revilla-León M, Barmak AB, Lanis A, et al.Influence of connected and nonconnected calibrated frameworks on the accuracy of complete arch implant scans obtained by using four intraoral scanners, a desktop scanner, and a photogrammetry system[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.01.017.[published online ahead of print].
[11] Sallorenzo A, Gómez-Polo M.Comparative study of the accuracy of an implant intraoral scanner and that of a conventional intraoral scanner for complete-arch fixed dental prostheses[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2022,128(5):1009-1016. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.01.032.
[12] Revilla-León M, Gómez-Polo M, Drone M, et al.Impact of scanning distance on the accuracy of a photogrammetry system[J]. J Dent, 2024,142:104854. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.104854.
[13] Pozzi A, Agliardi E, Lio F, et al.Accuracy of intraoral optical scan versus stereophotogrammetry for complete-arch digital implant impression: an in vitro study[J]. J Prosthodont Res, 2024,68(1):172-180. DOI: 10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_22_00251.
[14] Revilla-León M, Rubenstein J, Methani MM, et al.Trueness and precision of complete-arch photogrammetry implant scanning assessed with a coordinate-measuring machine[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2023,129(1):160-165. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.05.019.
[15] Revilla-León M, Gómez-Polo M, Drone M, et al.Influence of implant reference on the scanning accuracy of complete arch implant scans captured by using a photogrammetry system[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.01.008.[published online ahead of print].
[16] Kosago P, Ungurawasaporn C, Kukiattrakoon B.Comparison of the accuracy between conventional and various digital implant impressions for an implant-supported mandibular complete arch-fixed prosthesis: an in vitro study[J]. J Prosthodont, 2023,32(7):616-624. DOI: 10.1111/jopr.13604.
[17] Tohme H, Lawand G, Chmielewska M, et al.Comparison between stereophotogrammetric, digital, and conventional impression techniques in implant-supported fixed complete arch prostheses: an in vitro study[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2023,129(2):354-362. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.05.006.
[18] Pinto RJ, Casado SA, Chmielewski K, et al.Accuracy of different digital acquisition methods in complete arch implant-supported prostheses: an in vitro study[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2024,132(1):172-177. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.07.008.
[19] Sánchez-Monescillo A, Hernanz-Martín J, González-Serrano C, et al.All-on-four rehabilitation using photogrammetric impression technique[J]. Quintessence Int, 2019,50(4):288-293. DOI: 10.3290/j.qi.a42098.
[20] 付馨靓, 王浩, 甘雪琦. ICam4D摄影测量技术在无牙颌种植固定修复中的应用1例并文献回顾[J].口腔医学, 2022,42(1):72-78. DOI: 10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2022. 01.013.
[21] Peñarrocha-Oltra D, Agustín-Panadero R, Pradíes G, et al.Maxillary full-arch immediately loaded implant-supported fixed prosthesis designed and produced by photogrammetry and digital printing: a clinical report[J]. J Prosthodont, 2017,26(1):75-81. DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12364.
[22] 马博文, 林潇, 耿威. 三维扫描结合CBCT配准技术实现无牙颌全程数字化即刻种植修复的效果评估[J].中国口腔种植学杂志,2023,28(4):233-238. DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2023.08.005.
[23] Azevedo L, Molinero-Mourelle P, Antonaya-Martín J L, et al. Photogrammetry technique for the 3D digital impression of multiple dental implants[C]//VipIMAGE 2019: Proceedings of the VII ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Vision and Medical Image Processing, 2019,Portugal:Springer, 2019:615-619.
[24] 姚秀, 董正杰, 陈思, 等. 数字化技术辅助下全牙弓种植固定修复一例[J].中国口腔种植学杂志,2023,28(3):210-214. DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2023.06.014.
[25] 贺志肖, 贾淑清, 吴鸿昭, 等. 数字化技术在种植支持式全口固定义齿修复中的运用1例[J].口腔医学研究, 2023,39(6):562-564. DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj. 2023.06.018.
[26] Bishara M, Miron RJ, Kurtzman GM, et al.A digital approach to immediate-load, full-arch implant dentistry: a case report[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2022,42(5):587-593. DOI: 10.11607/prd.6048.
[27] 张丹丹, 李娟, 周荣华, 等. ICam4D摄影测量技术应用于全牙弓种植固定终修复的临床研究[J].口腔颌面修复学杂志, 2024,25(1):22-27. DOI: 10.19748/j.cn.kqxf.1009-3761.2024.1.004.
[28] Fu XJ, Liu M, Liu BL, et al.Accuracy of intraoral scan with prefabricated aids and stereophotogrammetry compared with open tray impressions for complete-arch implant-supported prosthesis: a clinical study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2024,35(8):830-840. DOI: 10.1111/clr.14183.
[29] Pozzi A, Carosi P, Gallucci GO, et al.Accuracy of complete-arch digital implant impression with intraoral optical scanning and stereophotogrammetry: an in vivo prospective comparative study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2023,34(10):1106-1117. DOI: 10.1111/clr.14141.
[30] Yan Y, Lin X, Yue X, et al.Accuracy of 2 direct digital scanning techniques-intraoral scanning and stereophotogrammetry-for complete arch implant-supported fixed prostheses: a prospective study[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2023,130(4):564-572. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.03.033.
[31] Zhang YJ, Qian SJ, Lai HC, et al.Accuracy of photogrammetric imaging versus conventional impressions for complete arch implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: a comparative clinical study[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2023,130(2):212-218. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.09.035.
[32] Orejas-Perez J, Gimenez-Gonzalez B, Ortiz-Collado I, et al.In vivo complete-arch implant digital impressions: comparison of the precision of three optical impression systems[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2022,19(7):4300. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19074300.
[33] Peñarrocha-Diago M, Balaguer-Martí JC, Peñarrocha-Oltra D, et al.A combined digital and stereophotogrammetric technique for rehabilitation with immediate loading of complete-arch, implant-supported prostheses: a randomized controlled pilot clinical trial[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2017,118(5):596-603. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.12.015.
[34] Gómez-Polo M, Sallorenzo A, Cascos R, et al.Conventional and digital complete arch implant impression techniques: an in vitro study comparing accuracy[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2024,132(4):809-818. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.08.028.
[35] Di Fiore A, Meneghello R, Graiff L, et al.Full arch digital scanning systems performances for implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: a comparative study of 8 intraoral scanners[J]. J Prosthodont Res, 2019,63(4):396-403. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpor.2019.04.002.
[36] Lyu M, Di P, Lin Y, et al.Accuracy of impressions for multiple implants: a comparative study of digital and conventional techniques[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2022,128(5):1017-1023. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.01.016.
[37] Bratos M, Bergin JM, Rubenstein JE, et al.Effect of simulated intraoral variables on the accuracy of a photogrammetric imaging technique for complete-arch implant prostheses[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2018,120(2):232-241. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.11.002.
[38] Gómez-Polo M, Cascos R, Ortega R, et al.Influence of arch location and scanning pattern on the scanning accuracy, scanning time, and number of photograms of complete-arch intraoral digital implant scans[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2023,34(6):591-601. DOI: 10.1111/clr.14069.
[39] Li Z, Huang R, Wu X, et al.Effect of scan pattern on the accuracy of complete-arch digital implant impressions with two intraoral scanners[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2022,37(4):731-739. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.9248.
[40] Revilla-León M, Subramanian SG, Özcan M, et al.Clinical study of the influence of ambient light scanning conditions on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of an intraoral scanner[J]. J Prosthodont, 2020,29(2):107-113. DOI: 10.1111/jopr.13135.
[41] Kim JE, Amelya A, Shin Y, et al.Accuracy of intraoral digital impressions using an artificial landmark[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2017,117(6):755-761. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.09.016.
[42] Pradíes G, Ferreiroa A, Özcan M, et al.Using stereophotogrammetric technology for obtaining intraoral digital impressions of implants[J]. J Am Dent Assoc, 2014,145(4):338-344. DOI: 10.14219/jada.2013.45.

立体摄影测量技术在全口种植修复印模制取中应用的文献回顾

Application of stereophotogrammetry in complete-arch implant impression making: a literature review

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	王一茗, 李昕茹, 滕微微, 马骏驰, 周立波. 口腔种植机器人在临床前及临床研究应用精度的Meta分析[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2024, 29(4): 362-370.
[2]	孟怡麟, 瞿晓辉, 滕新亚, 李如华, 毕立锋, 邹德荣. 全牙列即刻种植即刻负荷的机器人复杂种植[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2024, 29(1): 70-76.
[3]	张思慧, 陈威夷, 蔡琴, 林宇轩, 陈江. 比较全程引导与半程引导机器人技术对无牙颌种植精度的影响[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(4): 229-232.
[4]	苏天月, 赵金荣, 滕微微, 刘鹏慧, 李欣茹, 周立波. 自由手、种植外科导板、口腔种植机器人种植精度对比的体外研究[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(4): 244-249.
[5]	谢瑞, 李志文, 任楠, 赵瑞峰, 白石柱. 口腔种植机器人在不同视觉系统下的手术精度研究[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(3): 152-158.
[6]	贺瑾, 任凌飞, 张芩梦, 姜治伟, 杨国利. 分析自主式机器人种植术采用微创不翻瓣技术的临床应用价值[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(3): 159-164.
[7]	姜雨汐, 孙仕晨, 万林子, 刘文锋, 杨志康, 吴熙凤, 孙海鹏, 李树春, 高永波. 口腔种植机器人在即刻种植中的精度研究[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(3): 165-171.
[8]	黄弘, 付钢, 陈曦, 何田. 口腔种植机器人在前牙区即刻种植中的精度分析[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(3): 172-178.
[9]	皮雪敏, 陈德平, 任斌, 潘红, 宿玉成, 刘倩, 汪霞. 口腔种植机器人辅助美学区种植即刻修复的临床研究[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(3): 179-185.
[10]	李艳琴, 陈江. 机器人系统辅助口腔种植手术精度的Meta分析[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(3): 186-192.
[11]	陈丹莹, 吴夏怡, 刘泉, 陈卓凡. 美学区多牙连续缺失种植修复的印模制备方法[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(1): 30-34.
[12]	彭玲燕, 王勇, 宿玉成. 全牙弓种植即刻修复方案选择决策树[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2022, 27(6): 381-386.
[13]	陈江. 机器人在口腔种植领域的应用[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2022, 27(5): 274-279.
[14]	苏天月, 滕微微, 王琦, 舒倩怡, 周立波. 口腔种植体植入精度评估方法的应用进展[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2022, 27(4): 248-253.
[15]	彭玲燕, 汪霞, 皮雪敏, 刘倩, 陈德平, 唐素霞, 潘红, 宿玉成. 全牙列种植即刻临时修复方案选择[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2022, 27(3): 173-180.