中国口腔种植学杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (5): 387-391.DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2023.10.016

• 教育教学与管理 • 上一篇    

混合式教学模式在口腔种植学住院医师规范化培训中的应用

田思睿1, 邓宇2, 高静1, 赵宝红1   

  1. 1中国医科大学口腔医学院口腔种植科 口腔种植学教研室 辽宁省口腔疾病重点实验室 辽宁省口腔疾病转化医学研究中心,沈阳 110002;
    2中国医科大学口腔医学院·附属口腔医院毕业后培训部,沈阳 110002;
  • 收稿日期:2023-06-21 出版日期:2023-10-30 发布日期:2023-11-07
  • 通讯作者: 赵宝红,Email:bhzhao@cmu.edu.cn,电话:024-31927731
  • 作者简介:田思睿,硕士、医师,研究方向:口腔种植学;赵宝红,教授、主任医师、博士生导师,研究方向:种植体表面改性的研究、种植体的结构优化及生物力学研究
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(82071151);辽宁省自然科学基金(20170541059)

The application of a blended learning mode in standardized residency training in implant dentistry

Tian Sirui1, Deng Yu2, Gao Jing1, Zhao Baohong1   

  1. 1Department of Dental Implantology, School of Stomatology, China Medical University, Liaoning Provincial Institute of Stomatology, Liaoning Provincial Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Liaoning Provincial Translational Medicine Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shenyang 110002, Liaoning, China;
    2China Medical University-Affiliated Stomatology Hospital Education Department for After Graduation, Shenyang 110002, Liaoning, China
  • Received:2023-06-21 Online:2023-10-30 Published:2023-11-07
  • Contact: Zhao Baohong, Email: bhzhao@cmu.edu.cn, Tel: 0086-24-31927731
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(82071151); Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province(20170541059)

摘要: 目的 探索应用微课结合问题教学法(problem-based learning,PBL)、 案例式教学法(case-based learning, CBL)的混合式教学模式在口腔种植学住院医师规范化培训(简称“住培”)中的效果。方法 选取2022年1月至7月期间轮转口腔种植科的住培学员34人作为对照组(传统教学模式)及2023年1月至7月间轮转口腔种植科的住培学员32人为作为试验组(混合式教学模式)。轮转结束后通过考核成绩及问卷调查评估两种模式的教学效果。结果 试验组学员的各项理论(基础知识、病例分析)及操作考核(病史采集、临床检查、诊断、治疗设计、病历书写和操作技能)成绩均高于对照组,除病历书写外,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);问卷调查结果显示,混合式教学模式更易提高学员的学习兴趣,同时对于增强自主学习、团队合作、临床综合能力等方面均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 混合式教学模式教学效果明显优于传统教学模式,有助于提高住培医师的口腔种植临床诊疗水平和综合素质。

关键词: 住院医师规范化培训, 口腔种植学, 混合式教学模式, 微课, 问题教学法, 案例式教学法

Abstract: Objective To explore the effects of applying a blended learning mode combining microlecture with problem-based learning (PBL) and case-based learning (CBL) in the standardized residency training in implant dentistry (referred to as “residency training”). Methods Thirty-four residents training in the Department of Dental Implantology from January to July 2022 were selected as the control group (traditional learning mode) and 32 residents training in the Department of Dental Implantology from January to July 2023 were selected as the experimental group (blended learning mode). The learning effectiveness of the two modes was assessed by assessment scores and questionnaires at the end of the training. Results The results of the test group were higher than those of the control group in all theoretical (basic knowledge, case analysis) and operational tests (history taking, clinical examination, diagnosis, treatment design, medical record writing and operational skills), and the differences were statistically significant except for medical record writing (P < 0.05). According to the results of the questionnaire survey, the blended learning mode is more likely to improve the learning interest of the residents. At the same time, the results of the blended learning mode group were higher than those of the control group in terms of enhancing independent learning, teamwork, and comprehensive clinical ability, and these differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion The effect of the blended learning mode is significantly better than that of the traditional learning mode, which helps to improve the clinical diagnosis and treatment level of implant dentistry and comprehensive quality of residents.

Key words: Standardized residency training, Implant dentistry, Blended learning mode, Microlecture, Problem-based learning, Case-based learning