上颌单颗中切牙拔牙位点保存后种植的长期美学效果分析

doi:10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2021.02.003

中国口腔种植学杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (1): 7-12.DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2021.02.003

上颌单颗中切牙拔牙位点保存后种植的长期美学效果分析

戈怡¹, 姜秀瑛¹, 宿玉成^1,2

¹中国医学科学院北京协和医院口腔种植中心 100032;
²北京口腔种植培训中心 100032

收稿日期:2020-10-19 出版日期:2021-02-10 发布日期:2021-06-04
通讯作者: 宿玉成,Email：yuchengsu@163.com,电话：010-69154912,博士、主任医师、教授、博士导师,研究方向：口腔种植外科和正颌外科相关研究
作者简介:戈怡,硕士、副主任医师,研究方向：位点保存即刻种植相关研究
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划资助（2016YFC1102602）

Long term esthetic effect of implant restoration after alveolar ridge preservation of maxillary central incisor.

Ge Yi¹, Jiang Xiuying¹, Su Yucheng^1,2

¹Oral implant center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences;
²Beijing ImpIant Training College (BITC), Beijing 100032,China

Received:2020-10-19 Online:2021-02-10 Published:2021-06-04
Contact: Su Yucheng, Email: yuchengsu@163.com, Tel: 0086-10-66121299
Supported by:
National Key R&D Program of China(2016YFC1102602）

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的通过红/白美学评分分析上颌单颗中切牙拔牙位点保存后种植治疗的美学效果。方法选择2006年3月至2014年12月上颌单颗中切牙行拔牙位点保存后延期种植并完成最终修复的9例病例,共植入9颗种植体。随访期均在4年以上,平均为7.7年。治疗过程为拔除上颌单颗中切牙后,向拔牙窝内植入骨代用品,3~6个月植入种植体,愈合3~4个月后完成最终修复。评价方法为临床检查和数码照片,进行红色美学评分（PES）和白色美学评分（WES）评估。结果 9例种植体全部实现骨结合。PES/WES总分平均分为（16.56±1.34）(范围15~19)。PES总分平均分（7.78±1.13）(范围6~9),近中龈乳头高度平均分最高,为（1.89±0.31）,而唇侧根面突度/软组织颜色及质地平均分最低,为（1.11±0.57）,远中龈乳头高度和唇侧黏膜高度平均分为（1.56±0.50）;WES总平均分为（8.78±0.63）(范围8~10)。结论拔牙位点保存是避免拔牙窝愈合过程中唇侧骨板吸收的可靠手段之一。基于PES/WES显示的结果,上颌单颗中切牙拔牙位点保存后种植治疗可以获得满意的美学效果。

关键词: 拔牙位点保存, 种植美学, 红色美学评分, 白色美学评分

Abstract: Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the esthetic outcome of single maxillary incisor after delayed implant placement with alveolar ridge preservation, with index of pink and white esthetic scores. Methods Atotal of 9 cases treated from March 2006 to December 2014 were included in this study, each of which had one central maxillary incisor extracted followed by alveolar ridge preservation. The mean follow-up was 7.7 year, and all the data was gathered retrospectively over 4 years .The implants were placed after a healing period of 3~6 months, and the crowns were inserted 3~4 months after surgery. The assessment was performed using digital photographs presenting corresponding clinical situation with Pink Esthetic score(PES) and White esthetic score(WES). Results All the 9 implants were osseointegrated. The mean total PES/WES was (16.56±1.34) (range: 15 to 19). The mean PES was (7.78±1.13)(range: 6 to 9), the mesial papilla had the highest mean score(1.89±0.31), but root convexity/soft tissue color and texture had the lowest mean score(1.11±0.57), mean scores for the facial mucosa curvature and the distal papilla were the same as 1.56±0.50. mean scores for WES was (8.78±0.63)(range: 8 to 10). Conclusion Delayed implant placement with alveolar ridge preservation is an effective technique in achieving satisfactory esthetic Results of maxillary incisor.

Key words: extraction site preservation, implant aesthetics, pink esthetic score(PES), white esthetic score(WES)

戈怡,等姜秀瑛,等宿玉成. 上颌单颗中切牙拔牙位点保存后种植的长期美学效果分析[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2021, 26(1): 7-12. DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2021.02.003

Ge Yi, Jiang Xiuying, Su Yucheng. Long term esthetic effect of implant restoration after alveolar ridge preservation of maxillary central incisor.[J].Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2021, 26(1): 7-12.DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2021.02.003.

参考文献

[1] Cha HS, Kim JW, Hwang JH, et al.Frequency of bone graft in implant surgery[J]. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg, 2016, 38(1):19. DOI: 10.1186/s40902-016-0064-2.
[2] Lim HC, Seo S, Thoma DS, et al.Late implant placement following ridge preservation versus early implant placement: A pilot randomized clinical trial for periodontally compromised non-molar extraction sites[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2020, 47(2):247-256. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13223.
[3] Jung RE, Ioannidis A, Hämmerle C, et al.Alveolar ridge preservation in the esthetic zone[J]. Periodontol 2000, 2018, 77(1):165-175. DOI: 10.1111/prd.12209.
[4] Lee AMH, Poon CY.The clinical effectiveness of alveolar ridge preservation in the maxillary anterior esthetic zone-A retrospective study[J]. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 2017, 29(2): 137-145. DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12280.
[5] Belser UC, Grütter L, Vailati F, et al.Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores[J]. J Periodontol, 2009, 80(1):140-151. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2009.080435.
[6] Assenza B, Piattelli M, Scarano A, et al. Localized ridge augmentation using titanium micromesh[J]. J Oral Implantol, 2001, 27(6): 287-292. DOI: 10.1563/1548-1336(2001)027<0287:LRAUTM>2.3.CO;2.
[7] 宿玉成. 口腔种植学.第2版[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2014.
[8] Araújo MG, Lindhe J.Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2005, 32(2):212-218. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00642.x.
[9] Clementini M, Agostinelli A, Castelluzzo W, et al.The effect of immediate implant placement on alveolar ridge preservation compared to spontaneous healing after tooth extraction: Radiographic results of a randomized controlled clinical trial[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2019, 46(7):776-786. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13125.
[10] Sclar AG.Preserving alveolar ridge anatomy following tooth removal in conjunction with immediate implant placement. The Bio-Col technique[J]. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am, 1999, 7(2): 39-59.
[11] Sclar AG.Strategies for management of single-tooth extraction sites in aesthetic implant therapy[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2004, 62(9 Suppl 2):90-105. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2004.06.041.
[12] Jung RE, Siegenthaler DW, Hämmerle CH.Postextraction tissue management: a soft tissue punch technique[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2004, 24(6):545-553.
[13] Perelman-Karmon M, Kozlovsky A, Liloy R, et al.Socket site preservation using bovine bone mineral with and without a bioresorbable collagen membrane[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2012, 32(4):459-465.
[14] Fürhauser R, Florescu D, Benesch T, et al.Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns: the pink esthetic score[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2005, 16(6):639-644. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01193.x.
[15] Meijer HJ, Stellingsma K, Meijndert L, et al.A new index for rating aesthetics of implant-supported single crowns and adjacent soft tissues--the Implant Crown Aesthetic Index[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2005, 16(6):645-649. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01128.x.
[16] Jones AR, Martin W.Comparing pink and white esthetic scores to layperson perception in the single-tooth implant patient[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2014, 29(6):1348-1353. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.3785.

上颌单颗中切牙拔牙位点保存后种植的长期美学效果分析

Long term esthetic effect of implant restoration after alveolar ridge preservation of maxillary central incisor.

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 7

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	于久越, 贾雯昊, 方丽, 王健, 李江明, 刘晗, 郭启利. 利用Bio-Oss Collagen进行上颌磨牙拔除后拔牙位点保存的临床分析[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(2): 90-96.
[2]	刘雨蒙, 袁长永. 浓缩生长因子软组织封闭功能在口腔种植中的应用[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2021, 26(6): 396-399.
[3]	刘珍辉, 胡文杰. 拔牙位点保存创口封闭方式的临床进展[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2021, 26(5): 322-327.
[4]	石宇彤, 王翠, 胡文杰, 徐涛, 刘云松. 伴重度骨缺损的磨牙拔除后拔牙位点保存改善种植区软硬组织效果观察（附1例2.5年随访观察报告）[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2021, 26(3): 178-184.
[5]	韦宁, 徐涛, 胡文杰, 刘云松. 对伴上颌窦底骨缺损重度牙周病变磨牙实施微创拔牙及拔牙位点保存的初步探索（病例系列研究）[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2021, 26(2): 96-101.
[6]	邱立新. 拔牙窝植骨-拔牙位点保存技术要点[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2021, 26(1): 2-6.
[7]	刘焕磊. 拔牙位点保存技术应用于种植牙的临床研究分析[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2018, 23(4): 187-189.