中国口腔种植学杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (3): 134-136.DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2020.09.010

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

微创不翻瓣技术在口腔种植术中应用价值分析

倪柯州, 程雪云   

  1. 466000 河南省周口市中医院
  • 出版日期:2020-09-10 发布日期:2021-08-17

Analysis of the application value of minimally invasive non-flap technique in oral implantation

NI Kezhou, CHENG Xueyun   

  1. Zhoukou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhoukou 466000, Henan Province, Chinese
  • Online:2020-09-10 Published:2021-08-17

摘要: 目的: 分析微创不翻瓣技术在口腔种植术中应用价值。方法: 本研究以于2019年1月-2020年1月来我院诊治的口腔种植患者100例作为研究对象,随机数字法分为两组,每组50例,对照组行传统翻瓣技术治疗,实验组行微创不翻瓣技术治疗,对比临床疗效。结果: 实验组种植时间(0.45±0.46)h、术后激素使用时间(29.13±8.06)h、术后抗生素使用时间(35.05±7.25)h、术后肿胀持续时间(4.10±1.3)h、术后疼痛持续时间(29.48±5.82)h均低于对照组(P<0.05);实验组牙槽嵴骨吸收量(0.13±0.01)mm低于对照组、PES评分(14.32±1.19)分、WES评分(9.42±1.20)分均高对照组(P<0.05)。实验组种植成功率96.00%与对照组94.00%无显著差异(P>0.05);实验组不良反应发生率4.00%与对照组8.00%无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论: 口腔种植患者应用微创不翻瓣技术疗效显著,能够缩短种植时间,提高美观性,减少牙槽嵴骨吸收量,值得推广应用。

关键词: 微创不翻瓣技术, 口腔种植术, 牙槽嵴骨, 不良反应

Abstract: Objective: To analyze the application value of minimally invasive non-flap technique in oral implantation. Methods: In this study, 100 cases of oral implantation-treated patients in our hospital from January 2019 to January 2020 were taken as the research objects, and divided into two groups by random number method, with 50 cases in each group. The control group received traditional valvular technique treatment, while the experimental group received minimally invasive valvular technique treatment, and the clinical efficacy was compared. Results: Implantation time(0.45±0.46) h, postoperative hormone use time (29.13±8.06) h, postoperative antibiotic use time (35.05±7.25) h, postoperative swelling duration(4.10±1.3) h, and postoperative pain duration(29.48±5.82) h in the experimental group were all lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The alveolar bone absorption (0.13±0.01) mm in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group, while PES score(14.32±1.19) and WES score (9.42±1.20) were higher in the experimental group(P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the planting success rate of 96.00% in the experimental group and 94.00% in the control group(P> 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the experimental group(4.00%) and the control group(8.00%)(P>0.05). Conclusion: Minimally invasive non-flap technique has a significant effect on oral implant patients, which can shorten the implantation time, improve the aesthetics, and reduce the amount of alveolar ridge bone absorption. It is worthy of popularization and application.

Key words: minimally invasive non-flap technique, Oral implant, alveolar ridge bone, adverse reactions

中图分类号: