不同喷砂参数对医用四级纯钛表面粗糙度的影响

doi:10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2024.12.015

中国口腔种植学杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (6): 555-560.DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2024.12.015

不同喷砂参数对医用四级纯钛表面粗糙度的影响

刘奇奇¹, 赵雨佳¹, 邱林², 郝俊江³, 宿瀚奇³, 韩泽奎¹, 王心彧¹, 宿玉成^1,4,5,6

¹佳木斯大学口腔医学院佳木斯大学口腔医学工程实验中心黑龙江省生物医学材料及临床应用重点实验室 154002;
²北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院中心实验室 100080;
³北京卡尔斯医疗器械有限公司 102600;
⁴北京瑞城口腔医院 100032;
⁵北京口腔种植培训中心 100032;
⁶中国医学科学院北京协和医院口腔种植中心 100032

收稿日期:2024-07-20 出版日期:2025-01-02 发布日期:2025-01-02
通讯作者: 宿玉成,Email：yuchengsu@163.com,电话：010-66212299
作者简介:刘奇奇硕士研究生在读,研究方向：口腔种植体表面处理;宿玉成主任医师、教授、博士研究生导师,研究方向：口腔种植外科和正颌外科相关研究

Effect of different sandblasting parameters on the surface roughness of medical-grade Grade 4 pure titanium

Liu Qiqi¹, Zhao Yujia¹, Qiu Lin², Hao Junjiang³, Su Hanqi³, Han Zekui¹, Wang Xinyu¹, Su Yucheng^1,4,5,6

¹Stomatology Collage of Jiamusi University, Experimental Center for Stomatological Engineering, Jiamusi University, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedical Materials and Clinical Application, Heilongjiang Province, Jiamusi 154002, Heilongjiang, China;
²Central Laboratory, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100080, China;
³Beijing CRS Medical Device Co., Ltd, Beijing 102600, China;
⁴Beijing Citident Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100032, China;
⁵Beijing Implant Training College (BITC), Beijing 100032, China;
⁶Dental Implant Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100032, China

Received:2024-07-20 Online:2025-01-02 Published:2025-01-02
Contact: Su Yucheng, Email: yuchengsu@163.com, Tel: 0086-10-66212299

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨不同喷砂参数对医用四级纯钛表面粗糙度的影响,为优化纯钛大颗粒喷砂酸蚀表面性能提供参考。方法采用氧化铝颗粒利用正交实验设计,进行不同参数条件下的医用四级纯钛表面喷砂处理,通过正交实验极差和方差分析,分析喷砂的粒度、压强、距离及时间对医用四级纯钛表面平均粗糙度（roughness average,Ra）的影响。结果本实验因素水平范围内可获得Ra值1.083~2.494 μm粗糙度表面。其中最小表面粗糙度（A组）参数为喷砂材粒度100目、压强0.2 MPa、喷砂距离50 mm、时间60 s,最大表面粗糙度（B组）参数为喷砂材粒度60目、压强0.4 MPa、喷砂距离100 mm、时间15 s。结论在本实验因素水平范围内Ra值随喷砂粒度和时间的增大而减小,随喷砂压强和距离的增大而增大。

关键词: 牙种植体, 喷砂, 纯钛, 正交实验, 粗糙度

Abstract: Objective This study investigates the effect of different sandblasting parameters on the surface roughness of medical-grade Grade 4 pure titanium, aiming to provide reference data for optimizing SLA(sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched) surface characteristics. Methods Alumina particles were used in an orthogonal experimental design to analyze the effects of particle size, pressure, distance, and time on the surface roughness average (Ra) of Grade 4 pure titanium. Range analysis and variance analysis were performed to evaluate the impact of each parameter. Results The surface roughness with Ra value of 1.083~2.494 μm can be obtained within the range of factor levels in this experiment. The lowest surface roughness (Group A) was achieved with 100-mesh particles, 0.2 MPa pressure, a distance of 50 mm, and a duration of 60 seconds. The highest surface roughness (Group B) was observed with 60-mesh particles, 0.4 MPa pressure, a distance of 100 mm, and a duration of 15 seconds. Conclusion Within the range of parameter levels examined in this study, surface roughness decreased with increasing particles size and blasting time, while it increased with higher pressure and longer blasting distance.

Key words: Dental implant, Sandblasting, Pure titanium, Orthogonal experiment, Surface roughness

刘奇奇,赵雨佳,邱林,等. 不同喷砂参数对医用四级纯钛表面粗糙度的影响[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2025, 29(6): 555-560. DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2024.12.015

Liu Qiqi, Zhao Yujia, Qiu Lin, Hao Junjiang, Su Hanqi, Han Zekui, Wang Xinyu, Su Yucheng. Effect of different sandblasting parameters on the surface roughness of medical-grade Grade 4 pure titanium[J].Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2025, 29(6): 555-560.DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2024.12.015.

参考文献

[1] Sotova C, Yanushevich O, Kriheli N, et al.Dental implants: modern materials and methods of their surface modification[J]. Materials (Basel), 2023,16(23):7383. DOI: 10.3390/ma16237383.
[2] Yang BC, Zhou XD, Yu HY, et al.Advances in titanium dental implant surface modification[J]. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi, 2019,37(2):124-129. DOI: 10.7518/hxkq.2019.02.002.
[3] Hou C, An J, Zhao D, et al.Surface modification techniques to produce micro/nano-scale topographies on Ti-based implant surfaces for improved osseointegration[J]. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2022,10:835008. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.835008.
[4] Souza J, Bertolini M, Costa RC, et al.Proteomic profile of the saliva and plasma protein layer adsorbed on Ti-Zr alloy: the effect of sandblasted and acid-etched surface treatment[J]. Biofouling, 2020,36(4):428-441. DOI: 10.1080/08927014.2020.1769613.
[5] Ramos CB, Costa LNL, Delany MM.Influence of different acid etchings on the superficial characteristics of Ti sandblasted with Al₂O₃[J]. Materials Res, 2013, 16(5):1006-1014. DOI: 10.1590/S1516-14392013005000067.
[6] Eun SM, Son K, Hwang SM, et al.The impact of mechanical debridement techniques on titanium implant surfaces: a comparison of sandblasted, acid-etched, and femtosecond laser-treated surfaces[J]. J Funct Biomater, 2023,14(10):502. DOI: 10.3390/jfb14100502.
[7] Sayin Ozel G, Inan O, Secilmis Acar A, et al.Stability of dental implants with sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) and modified (SLActive) surfaces during the osseointegration period[J]. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects, 2021,15(4):226-231. DOI: 10.34172/joddd.2021.037.
[8] Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T.Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2009,20(Suppl 4):S172-S184. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01775.x.
[9] Schupbach P, Glauser R, Bauer S.Al₂O₃ particles on titanium dental implant systems following sandblasting and acid-etching process[J]. Int J Biomater, 2019,2019:6318429. DOI: 10.1155/2019/6318429.
[10] Nadar YS, Kutty MG, Abdul Aziz AR.Relative effect of sand blasting and acid etching on the surface roughness of pure titanium and titanium alloy for dental implants[J]. Advanced Materials Res, 2014,1043:145-148. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.1043.145.
[11] Gil FJ, Pérez RA, Olmos J, et al.The effect of using Al₂O₃ and TiO₂ in sandblasting of titanium dental implants[J]. J Materials Res, 2022,37:2602-2613. DOI: 10.1557/s43578-022-00534-0.
[12] Lan J, Zhang J, Jia X, et al.Optimization design of surface wave electromagnetic acoustic transducers based on simulation analysis and orthogonal test method[J]. Sensors (Basel), 2022,22(2):524. DOI: 10.3390/s22020524.
[13] Conserva E, Menini M, Ravera G, et al.The role of surface implant treatments on the biological behavior of SaOS-2 osteoblast-like cells. an in vitro comparative study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2013,24(8):880-889. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02397.x.
[14] Wu Y, Zitelli JP, TenHuisen KS, et al. Differential response of staphylococci and osteoblasts to varying titanium surface roughness[J]. Biomaterials, 2011,32(4):951-960. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.10.001.
[15] Rosales-Leal JI, Rodríguez-Valverde MA, Mazzaglia G, et al.Effect of roughness, wettability and morphology of engineered titanium surfaces on osteoblast-like cell adhesion[J]. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp, 2010,365(1-3):222-229. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2009.12.017.
[16] Andrukhov O, Huber R, Shi B, et al.Proliferation, behavior, and differentiation of osteoblasts on surfaces of different microroughness[J]. Dent Mater, 2016,32(11):1374-1384. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.08.217.
[17] Stoilov M, Stoilov L, Enkling N, et al.Effects of different titanium surface treatments on adhesion, proliferation and differentiation of bone cells: an in vitro study[J]. J Funct Biomater, 2022,13(3):143. DOI: 10.3390/jfb13030143.
[18] Jemat A, Ghazali MJ, Razali M, et al.Surface modifications and their effects on titanium dental implants[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2015,2015:791725. DOI: 10.1155/2015/791725.
[19] Menezes H, Naves MM, Costa HL, et al.Effect of surgical installation of dental implants on surface topography and its influence on osteoblast proliferation[J]. Int J Dent, 2018,2018:4089274. DOI: 10.1155/2018/4089274.
[20] Ehsan A, Bijan M.Improving the surface roughness of dental implant fixture by considering the size, angle and spraying pressure of sandblast particles[J]. J Bionic Eng, 2024,21(1):303-324. DOI: 10.1007/s42235-023-00422-1.
[21] Li HZ, Yan JG, Yan JW, et al.Influence of process parameters of ultrasonic shot peening on surface roughness and hydrophilicity of pure titanium[J]. Surf Coat Tech, 2017,317:38-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2017.03.044.
[22] Peter EM, Michael T, Ronny B, et al.Acoustic evaluation of the impact of moist spherical granules and glass beads[J]. Powder Technol, 2015,278:138-149. DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2015.03.023.
[23] Mordyuk BN, Prokopenko GI.Ultrasonic impact peening for the surface properties’ management[J]. J Sound Vib, 2007,308(3-5):855-866. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2007.03.054.
[24] Kun D, Juan V, Stone Z, et al.Finite element modeling of the surface roughness of 5052 Al alloy subjected to a surface severe plastic deformation process[J]. Acta Mater, 2004,52(20): 5771-5782. DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.08.031.
[25] Sara B, Ghelichi R, Mario G.Numerical and experimental analysis of surface roughness generated by shot peening[J]. Appl Surf Sci, 2019,98:88-102. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.03.111.
[26] Hengfeng M, Simon L, Perron C, et al.On the potential applications of a 3D random finite element model for the simulation of shot peening[J]. Adv Eng Softw, 2009,40(10):1023-1038. DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2009.03.013.
[27] Majzoobi GH, Azadikhah K, Nemati J.The effects of deep rolling and shot peening on fretting fatigue resistance of aluminum-7075-T6[J]. Mat Sci Eng A-Struct, 2009,516(1-2): 235-247. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2009.03.020.
[28] Julie M, Maxence B, Pierre-Emmanuel M, et al.Relation between roughness and processing conditions of AISI 316L stainless steel treated by ultrasonic shot peening[J]. Tribol Int, 2015,82:319-329. DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2014.07.013.

不同喷砂参数对医用四级纯钛表面粗糙度的影响

Effect of different sandblasting parameters on the surface roughness of medical-grade Grade 4 pure titanium

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 7

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	王琦, 杨波, 刘璐, 李翠英, 王心彧. 不同颌骨密度下种植体设计对其骨界面应力分布影响的有限元分析[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2024, 29(2): 159-168.
[2]	林倩, 韩泽奎, 宋振宇, 车迪, 段峰, 王心彧. SLA处理3D打印及锻造TC4植入物在高血糖动物模型中的应用研究[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(5): 332-339.
[3]	罗桂生, 刘雨蒙, 王鹏来, 袁长永. 微量元素改性PEEK种植体的研究进展[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(2): 109-113.
[4]	龚佳明, 赵瑞敏, 王佳, 戴志明, 余占海, 殷丽华. 种植体周囊肿的系统性文献综述[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2022, 27(3): 181-187.
[5]	刘成武, 刘远翔, 李志鹏, 刘泉, 武诗语, 吴夏怡, 陈泽涛, 黄宝鑫, 陈卓凡. 两种不同螺纹设计的牙种植体在犬颌骨中骨结合的对比研究[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2021, 26(4): 226-231.
[6]	吐逊阿依·哈斯木, 孙琴, 华英. 牙种植体同步植入Bio-oss骨粉对牙槽骨骨量缺损患者神经功能的影响[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2020, 25(3): 105-107.
[7]	王骅, 王鹞, 张彪. 3D 打印钛合金牙种植体的细胞毒性的研究[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2019, 24(1): 10-13.