Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology ›› 2020, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (3): 119-123.DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2020.09.006

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Clinical effects of immediate and delayed implants in patients with periodontal disease after tooth extraction:a meta-analysis

ZHANG Mei, LI Shuo, ZHANG Yao   

  1. The Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou Stomatological Hospital, Soochow, Suzhou 215000, Jiangsu Province, China.
  • Online:2020-09-10 Published:2021-08-17

Abstract: Objective: To study the clinical effect of immediate and delayed implantation on patients with periodontal disease after tooth extraction. Methods: Six databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, and CNKI were searched up to December 2019. The two authors independently performed literature screening, data extraction, and bias risk assessment. Data were extracted and statistically analyzed using RevMan5.2 software. Results: A total of 8 studies were included. The meta-analysis showed that the red aesthetic score at 3, 6 and 12 months after implantation was higher in the immediate implant group than the delayed implant group. The amount of bone resorption in the neck of the immediate implantation group was lower than that of the delayed implantation group, and the difference was statistically significant; there was no statistical difference in the depth of exploration and the success rate of implantation between the two groups. Conclusion: The similar long-term treatment effect can be obtained with immediate and delayed implanting. Immediate implanting in the short term has better results than delayed implanting. Randomized controlled experiments requiring larger samples and longer observation times for more reliable results.

Key words: immediately implant, delayed implant, periodontal disease

CLC Number: