Clinical research of the osteotome sinus floor elevation in patients with chronic maxillary sinusitis

doi:10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2021.02.004

Abstract

Abstract: Objective To analyze the bone remodeling around the implant in patients with chronic maxillary sinusitis after the osteotome sinus floor elevation (OSFE). Methods 60 patients with implant restoration in the posterior maxilla area by OSFE from January, 2015 to June, 2016 in our department were selected retrospectively in this study. They were divided into two groups according to the mucosal thickness. Changes in marginal bone level over time were observed. Results By the Independent sample t test, the apical bone height (ABH) and marginal bone loss (MBL) was compared between the two groups at 6 months and 3 years after surgery. There was no statistically significant difference in ABH and MBL between the two groups (P>0.05). 3 years after surgery, the VBG in the inflammation group was significantly lower than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion For patients with chronic maxillary sinusitis, it is feasible to use the Osteotome sinus floor elevation, and the prognosis is good.

Key words: osteotome sinus floor elevation, chronic maxillary sinusitis, vertical bone gain, crestal bone loss

Wang Xingxing, Chen Xutao, Wang Lei, Shi Shaojie, Zhao Guoqiang, Zhao Wenshuang, Song Yingliang. Clinical research of the osteotome sinus floor elevation in patients with chronic maxillary sinusitis[J]. Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2021, 26(1): 13-17.

References

[1] Baldi D, Menini M, Pera F, et al.Sinus floor elevation using osteotomes or piezoelectric surgery[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2011, 40(5) : 497-503. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2011.01.006.
[2] Fouad W, Osman A, Atef M, et al.Guided maxillary sinus floor elevation using deproteinized bovine bone versus graftless Schneiderian membrane elevation with simultaneous implant placement: Randomized clinical trial[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2018, 20(3) : 424-433. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12601.
[3] Qin L, Lin SX, Guo ZZ, et al.Influences of Schneiderian membrane conditions on the early outcomes of osteotome sinus floor elevation technique: a prospective cohort study in the healing period[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2017, 28(9) : 1074-1081. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12920.
[4] Fang Y, An X, Jeong SM, et al.Crestal Sinus Augmentation in the Presence of Severe Sinus Mucosal Thickening: A Report of 3 Cases[J]. Implant Dent, 2018, 27(3) : 388-393. DOI: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000754.
[5] Aimetti M, Massei G, Morra M, et al.Correlation between gingival phenotype and Schneiderian membrane thickness[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2008, 23(6): 1128.
[6] Shanbhag S, Karnik P, Shirke P, et al.Cone-beam computed tomographic analysis of sinus membrane thickness, ostium patency, and residual ridge heights in the posterior maxilla: implications for sinus floor elevation[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014, 25(6) :755-760. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12168.
[7] Zojaji R, Naghibzadeh M, Mazloum Farsi Baf M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in the evaluation of chronic rhinosinusitis[J]. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec, 2015, 77(1) : 55-60. DOI: 10.1159/000373927.
[8] Buskina AV, Gerber VKh.Clinical classification of chronic odontogenic maxillary sinusitis[J]. Vestn Otorinolaringol, 2000, (2) : 20-22.
[9] Janner SF, Caversaccio MD, Dubach P, et al.Characteristics and dimensions of the Schneiderian membrane: a radiographic analysis using cone beam computed tomography in patients referred for dental implant surgery in the posterior maxilla[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2011, 22(12) : 1446-1453. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02140.x.
[10] Pommer B, Dvorak G, Jesch P, et al.Effect of maxillary sinus floor augmentation on sinus membrane thickness in computed tomography[J]. J Periodontol, 2012, 83(5): 551-556. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2011.110345.
[11] Anduze-Acher G, Brochery B, Felizardo R, et al.Change in sinus membrane dimension following sinus floor elevation: a retrospective cohort study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2013, 24(10) : 1123-1129. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02520.x.
[12] Barone A, Santini S, Marconcini S, et al.Osteotomy and membrane elevation during the maxillary sinus augmentation procedure. A comparative study: piezoelectric device vs. conventional rotative instruments[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2008, 19(5) : 511-515. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01498.x.
[13] Becker ST, Terheyden H, Steinriede A, et al.Prospective observation of 41 perforations of the Schneiderian membrane during sinus floor elevation[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2008, 19(12) : 1285-1289. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01612.x.
[14] Berengo M, Sivolella S, Majzoub Z, et al.Endoscopic evaluation of the bone-added osteotome sinus floor elevation procedure[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2004, 33(2) : 189-194. DOI: 10.1054/ijom.2002.0459.
[15] Cakur B, Sümbüllü MA, Durna D.Relationship among Schneiderian membrane, Underwood's septa, and the maxillary sinus inferior border[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2013, 15(1) : 83-87. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00336.x.
[16] Buser D, Weber HP, Lang NP.Tissue integration of non-submerged implants. 1-year results of a prospective study with 100 ITI hollow-cylinder and hollow-screw implants[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 1990, 1(1) : 33-40. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1990.010105.x.
[17] Hingsammer L, Watzek G, Pommer B.The influence of crown-to-implant ratio on marginal bone levels around splinted short dental implants: A radiological and clincial short term analysis[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2017, 19(6) : 1090-1098. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12546.
[18] Misch CE, Perel ML, Wang HL, et al.Implant success, survival, and failure: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa Consensus Conference[J]. Implant Dent, 2008, 17(1) : 5-15. DOI: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3181676059.
[19] Srouji S, Ben-David D, Lotan R, et al.The innate osteogenic potential of the maxillary sinus (Schneiderian) membrane: an ectopic tissue transplant model simulating sinus lifting[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2010, 39(8): 793-801. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2010.03.009.
[20] Verdugo F, D'Addona A, Pontón J. Clinical, tomographic, and histological assessment of periosteal guided bone regeneration with cortical perforations in advanced human critical size defects[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2012, 14(1) : 112-120. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00235.x.
[21] Scala A, Botticelli D, Faeda RS, et al.Lack of influence of the Schneiderian membrane in forming new bone apical to implants simultaneously installed with sinus floor elevation: an experimental study in monkeys[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2012, 23(2) : 175-181. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02227.x.
[22] Lundgren S, Andersson S, Gualini F, et al.Bone reformation with sinus membrane elevation: a new surgical technique for maxillary sinus floor augmentation[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2004, 6(3) : 165-173.
[23] Anavi Y, Allon DM, Avishai G, et al.Complications of maxillary sinus augmentations in a selective series of patients[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2008, 106(1) : 34-38. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo. 2007.09.021.
[24] Lin Y, Hu X, Metzmacher AR, et al.Maxillary sinus augmentation following removal of a maxillary sinus pseudocyst after a shortened healing period[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2010, 68(11) : 2856-2860. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.05.091.