胶原蛋白海绵用于种植体周角化龈增量的临床效果观察

doi:10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2024.10.013

中国口腔种植学杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (5): 474-479.DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2024.10.013

胶原蛋白海绵用于种植体周角化龈增量的临床效果观察

钟志通, 黄忞, 王婧, 沈溱原, 吴润发

南昌大学附属口腔医院江西省口腔生物医学重点实验室江西省口腔疾病临床医学研究中心 330006

收稿日期:2024-01-20 出版日期:2024-10-30 发布日期:2024-10-30
通讯作者: 吴润发,Email：zzydf721@163.com 电话：0791-86363620
作者简介:钟志通,硕士研究生,研究方向：种植体周软硬组织增量;吴润发,主任医师、副教授、硕士研究生导师,研究方向：种植体周软硬组织增量
基金资助:
江西省应用研究培育计划（20212BAG70018）

Clinical evaluation of collagen sponge for augmenting keratinized gingiva around dental implants

Zhong Zhitong, Huang Min, Wang Jing, Shen Qinyuan, Wu Runfa

The Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Nanchang University & The Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine, Jiangxi Province & Jiangxi Province Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Nanchang 330006, China

Received:2024-01-20 Online:2024-10-30 Published:2024-10-30
Contact: Wu Runfa, Email: zzydf721@163.com, Tel: 0086-791-86363620
Supported by:
Jiangxi Province Applied Research Cultivation Plan (20212BAG70018)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的评价胶原蛋白海绵用于种植体周角化龈增量的临床效果。方法 14例患者的16个手术位点随机分为胶原蛋白海绵组和游离龈移植物组进行角化龈增量。在基线、术后即刻、6周和12周测量角化龈宽度、软组织厚度变化、颜色差异,视觉模拟评分法（visual analogue scale,VAS）评分疼痛。结果在12周时,游离龈移植物组与胶原蛋白海绵组角化龈宽度分别为（5.81±0.75） mm和（3.50±0.53）mm（P<0.001）,软组织厚度的变化量分别为（0.83±0.44）mm和（0.04±0.07）mm（P<0.05）,颜色差异数值分别为130.86±53.99和34.13±31.77（P<0.05）,VAS疼痛评分分别为（5.13±1.25）分和（1.88±1.13）分（P<0.001）,手术时间分别为（38.17±4.56）min和（21.17±3.72）min（P<0.01）,均具有统计学差异。结论胶原蛋白海绵可用于种植体周角化龈增量,与游离龈移植物相比,可以获得更佳的美学效果,减少手术时间,并避免由于开辟供区带来的额外创伤。

关键词: 种植牙, 角化龈增量, 胶原蛋白海绵, 替代物

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of collagen sponge in augmenting keratinized gingiva around dental implants. Methods Fourteen patients with 16 surgical sites were randomly assigned to either the collagen sponge group or the free gingival graft group for keratinized gingiva augmentation. The width of keratinized tissue (WKT), soft tissue thickness (ST), color difference, and visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores were measured at baseline, immediately after surgery, and at 6 weeks and 12 weeks postoperatively. Results At 12 weeks, the WKT was (5.81±0.75) mm and (3.50±0.53) mm (P<0.001), and the change in soft tissue thickness was (0.83±0.44) mm and (0.04±0.07) mm (P<0.05) in the free gingival graft and collagen sponge groups, respectively. The color difference values were 130.86±53.99 and 34.13±31.77 (P<0.05), the VAS pain scores was 5.13±1.25 and 1.88±1.13 (P<0.001), and the operative time was (38.17±4.56) min and (21.17±3.72) min (P<0.01), respectively, showing statistically significant differences. Conclusion Collagen sponge can be used for peri-implant keratinized gingiva augmentation. Compared with free gingival grafts, collagen sponges provide better aesthetic results, reduce operation time, and avoid the additional trauma associated with donor site harvesting.

Key words: Dental implant, Keratinized gingiva augmentation, Collagen sponge, Substitute

钟志通,黄忞,王婧,等. 胶原蛋白海绵用于种植体周角化龈增量的临床效果观察[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2024, 29(5): 474-479. DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2024.10.013

Zhong Zhitong, Huang Min, Wang Jing, Shen Qinyuan, Wu Runfa. Clinical evaluation of collagen sponge for augmenting keratinized gingiva around dental implants[J].Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2024, 29(5): 474-479.DOI: 10.12337/zgkqzzxzz.2024.10.013.

参考文献

[1] Chiapasco M, Casentini P, Zaniboni M.Bone augmentation procedures in implant dentistry[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2009,24(Suppl):237-259.
[2] Tan WL, Wong TL, Wong MC, et al.A systematic review of post-extractional alveolar hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2012,23(Suppl 5):1-21. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02375.x.
[3] Lin GH, Chan HL, Wang HL.The significance of keratinized mucosa on implant health: a systematic review[J]. J Periodontol, 2013,84(12):1755-1767. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2013.120688.
[4] Lorenzo R, García V, Orsini M, et al.Clinical efficacy of a xenogeneic collagen matrix in augmenting keratinized mucosa around implants: a randomized controlled prospective clinical trial[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2012,23(3):316-324. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02260.x.
[5] Vieira Ede O, Fidel Junior RA, Figueredo CM, et al.Clinical evaluation of a dermic allograft in procedures to increase attached gingiva width[J]. Braz Dent J, 2009,20(3):191-194. DOI: 10.1590/s0103-64402009000300003.
[6] Olsen D, Yang C, Bodo M, et al.Recombinant collagen and gelatin for drug delivery[J]. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 2003,55(12):1547-1567. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2003.08.008.
[7] Kumar MS, Kirubanandan S, Sripriya R, et al.Triphala incorporated collagen sponge-a smart biomaterial for infected dermal wound healing[J]. J Surg Res, 2010,158(1):162-170. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2008.07.006.
[8] Kim JW, Seong TW, Cho S, et al.Randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of absorbable collagen sponge after extraction of impacted mandibular third molar: split-mouth design[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2020,20(1):77. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-020-1063-3.
[9] 覃凤均, 陈旭, 李迟. 胶原蛋白海绵治疗Ⅱ度烧伤创面的临床疗效研究[J].中国全科医学,2010,13(18):1994-1996. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2010.18.015.
[10] Huang JP, Liu JM, Wu YM, et al.Clinical evaluation of xenogeneic collagen matrix versus free gingival grafts for keratinized mucosa augmentation around dental implants: a randomized controlled clinical trial[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2021,48(10):1293-1301. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13518.
[11] Basegmez C, Karabuda ZC, Demirel K, et al.The comparison of acellular dermal matrix allografts with free gingival grafts in the augmentation of peri-implant attached mucosa: a randomised controlled trial[J]. Eur J Oral Implantol, 2013,6(2):145-152.
[12] Al-Diasty Z, El-Meadawy S, Salem AS, et al.Onlay platelet-rich fibrin membrane versus free gingival graft in increasing the width of keratinized mucosa around dental implants: a split-mouth randomized clinical study[J]. J Adv Periodontol Implant Dent, 2022,14(2):53-61. DOI: 10.34172/japid.2022.013.
[13] Schmitt CM, Moest T, Lutz R, et al.Long-term outcomes after vestibuloplasty with a porcine collagen matrix (Mucograft® ) versus the free gingival graft: a comparative prospective clinical trial[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2016,27(11):e125-e133.DOI:10.1111/clr.12575.
[14] Sullivan HC, Atkins JH.Freeutogenous gingival grafts. 1. Principles of successful grafting[J]. Periodontics, 1968,6(1):5-13.
[15] Wang II, Barootchi S, Tavelli L, et al.The peri-implant phenotype and implant esthetic complications. Contemporary overview[J]. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2021,33(1):212-223. DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12709.
[16] Ramanauskaite A, Obreja K, Müller KM, et al.Three-dimensional changes of a porcine collagen matrix and free gingival grafts for soft tissue augmentation to increase the width of keratinized tissue around dental implants: a randomized controlled clinical study[J]. Int J Implant Dent, 2023,9(1):13. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-023-00482-2.
[17] Thoma DS, Benić GI, Zwahlen M, et al. A systematic review assessing soft tissue augmentation techniques[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2009,20(Suppl 4):146-165. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01784.x.
[18] Yaghini J, Mogharehabed A, Feizi A, et al.Efficacy of acellular dermal matrix in soft tissue augmentation around dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Oral Implantol, 2023,49(2):197-205. DOI: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-21-00021.
[19] Solonko M, Regidor E, Ortiz-Vigón A, et al.Efficacy of keratinized mucosal augmentation with a collagen matrix concomitant to the surgical treatment of peri-implantitis: a dual-center randomized clinical trial[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2022,33(1):105-119. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13870.
[20] McGuire MK, Scheyer ET, Lipton DI, et al. Randomized, controlled, clinical trial to evaluate a xenogeneic collagen matrix as an alternative to free gingival grafting for oral soft tissue augmentation: a 6-to 8-year follow-up[J]. J Periodontol, 2021,92(8):1088-1095. DOI: 10.1002/JPER.20-0627.
[21] Scheyer ET, Nevins ML, Neiva R, et al.Generation of site-appropriate tissue by a living cellular sheet in the treatment of mucogingival defects[J]. J Periodontol, 2014,85(4):e57-e64. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2013.130348.
[22] Vignoletti F, Nunez J, Sanz M.Soft tissue wound healing at teeth, dental implants and the edentulous ridge when using barrier membranes, growth and differentiation factors and soft tissue substitutes[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2014,41(Suppl 15):S23-S35. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12191.
[23] Sculean A, Gruber R, Bosshardt DD.Soft tissue wound healing around teeth and dental implants[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2014,41(Suppl 15):S6-S22. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12206.
[24] Schmitt CM, Tudor C, Kiener K, et al.Vestibuloplasty: porcine collagen matrix versus free gingival graft: a clinical and histologic study[J]. J Periodontol, 2013,84(7):914-923. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2012.120084.
[25] Tonetti MS, Cortellini P, Pellegrini G, et al.Xenogenic collagen matrix or autologous connective tissue graft as adjunct to coronally advanced flaps for coverage of multiple adjacent gingival recession: randomized trial assessing non-inferiority in root coverage and superiority in oral health-related quality of life[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2018,45(1):78-88. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12834.
[26] Chackartchi T, Romanos GE, Sculean A.Soft tissue-related complications and management around dental implants[J]. Periodontol 2000, 2019,81(1):124-138. DOI: 10.1111/prd.12287.

胶原蛋白海绵用于种植体周角化龈增量的临床效果观察

Clinical evaluation of collagen sponge for augmenting keratinized gingiva around dental implants

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	陈钢. 骨环技术纠正种植三维骨量不足的临床回顾研究[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2024, 29(5): 429-434.
[2]	蒋娟娜, 李俊满, 陈琳, 谢亮焜. 自体骨-异种骨混合的钛网支撑的引导骨再生伴角化龈增量的美学区连续牙列缺损种植修复一例[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2024, 29(3): 272-276.
[3]	董潇潇. 种植体周炎治疗时种植体表面的清洁去污处理[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(6): 437-443.
[4]	杨德钊, 许滢洁, 汤正婷, 马玉霄, 李光成, 孟凡文. 拉力螺钉技术在牙槽嵴块状骨移植中的应用[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2022, 27(4): 217-223.
[5]	邓磊, 程熠, 赵楠, 陈岗, 黄海涛. 胶原蛋白海绵在穿牙槽嵴上颌窦底提升中应用效果的研究[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2022, 27(3): 147-155.
[6]	彭贵雪. 人工种植牙手术的护理配合及对手术成功率的影响[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2020, 25(4): 169-171.
[7]	王乐乐. 口腔种植手术室循环风持续消毒中实施精细化护理的应用效果[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2020, 25(4): 180-181.
[8]	陈萍, 姚贵良, 王夏衡. 康盛种植体短期临床效果和影像学结果的回顾性研究[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2020, 25(2): 55-59.
[9]	李军, 张俊花, 孙丽华, 张宾, 刘童斌. 老年无牙颌患者应用locator 种植覆盖义齿的回顾研究[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2020, 25(2): 64-68.
[10]	康博, 潘颖菁, 温玉洁, 杜丽娟, 谢倩艺. 钛网结合无机牛骨在磨牙区种植同期垂直骨增量的应用[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2019, 24(3): 106-109.
[11]	徐强, 程佳宏, 古丽米拉.木明, 谢苗苗, 兰馨, 叶钟泰. 种植牙患者近远期修复并发症的研究分析及危险因素探讨[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2019, 24(3): 110-113.
[12]	孙晨雨, 朱洪光, 白建文. 种植牙失败病例原因分析[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2019, 24(3): 139-141.
[13]	邢伟超. 上颌前牙拔除后即刻种植修复的临床研究[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2019, 24(3): 142-144.
[14]	师海瑞, 孔义华, 王显河, 吴秋阳, 梅艳. 既往种植牙合并复发性口腔溃疡患者的CD3+、CD4+、CD8+、IL-2、IL-6、TNF-α 水平变化分析研究[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2019, 24(2): 55-58.
[15]	李志进, 郭家平. 鼻腭管区种植的研究进展[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2019, 24(2): 92-97.